VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #1  
Old 01-31-2005, 05:18 AM
Dave Oakes Dave Oakes is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 19
Default Fuel selector

I have not heard of anyone using the Cessna type selector. The fuel would feed from both fuel tanks at the same time.
Why is that?
I can see many advantages.
Thanks
Dave
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-31-2005, 07:43 AM
N916K's Avatar
N916K N916K is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tehachapi, CA
Posts: 538
Default

I've always been told it's because RV's don't have a header tank so if one tank runs dry you could start sucking air. I haven't really looked into it but that sounds possible to me. Another reason is that it would be easy for fuel to flow from one tank to the other unchecked, resulting in a very heavy wing. High wing planes don't have this problem because of the whole gravity thing.
__________________
Cam
Santa Ana, CA
RV-9 at KFUL
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-31-2005, 12:02 PM
penguin penguin is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: England
Posts: 1,087
Default Cessna fuel selector - bad idea

In a low wing aircraft with 2 wing tanks you should (must?) be able to select each tank in turn. As the previous post mentioned, if both are selected and one empties, the engine will suck air until you select only the tank with fuel in it. It doesn't matter how you uncover the fuel pick up in one tank (slipping, flying upside down, etc) the engine won't start drawing fuel again until both pick-ups are covered. IMHO poorly thought out fuel system modifications result in many engine stoppages. Why not stay with the simple, tried & tested system Van's recommend? Changing tanks every hour is not really a hardship. The only change I have made is an Andair fuel selector.

Pete
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-31-2005, 12:51 PM
Dave Oakes Dave Oakes is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Central Indiana
Posts: 19
Default

Having had only experience in a Cessna with the single fuel selector I did not know of the fact of the engine sucking air with one tank empty. It is no wonder that I had not heard of anyone using the "both" selectors. Thats the reason I ask.

Thanks for the information
Dave
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-04-2005, 05:25 PM
Mustang Mustang is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 133
Default

Dave,

Yes, if you do some research, you will find that no production low wing aircraft has a "both" selection on the fuel valve. For the reasons stated above. On the other hand, people that have attempted to re-invent the wheel and have installed a fuel selector with a "both" selection on their new RV, have had engine flameouts.

If you must modify your fuel system, the Andair valve is the way to go. Read about this and other fuel system problems in the latest issue, "21 YEARS of the RV-ATOR" distributed by the Builders Bookstore info@buildersbooks.com

Cheers, Pete
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:46 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.