VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-25-2009, 09:21 AM
pierre smith's Avatar
pierre smith pierre smith is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Louisville, Ga
Posts: 7,840
Default Say, Mel....

....a friend has an interesting question that I don't have an answer for.

Since South Africa doesn't have a 51% requirement, there are quite a few RV's already built and more being professionally built there.

The question is this: Would the airplane be able to be registered over here if it were imported by an American buyer after the owner sold it to the new buyer?

Thanks,
__________________
Pierre Smith
RV-10, 510 TT
RV6A (Sojourner) 180 HP, Catto 3 Bl (502Hrs), gone...and already missed
Air Tractor AT 502B PT 6-15 Sold
Air Tractor 402 PT-6-20 Sold
EAA Flight Advisor/CFI/Tech Counselor
Louisville, Ga

It's never skill or craftsmanship that completes airplanes, it's the will to do so,
Patrick Kenny, EAA 275132


Dues gladly paid!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-25-2009, 09:34 AM
Norman CYYJ Norman CYYJ is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Victoria B.C.
Posts: 1,265
Default

Pierre, what is a tech c....green?
In Canada an import experimental has to go thru a complete final inspection and must have at least 100 hours on it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-25-2009, 10:18 AM
osxuser's Avatar
osxuser osxuser is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pasadena CA
Posts: 2,484
Default

I don't think that it could be imported over here under Exp-AB rules. It would probably have to the Exp-Exhibition.
__________________
Stephen Samuelian, CFII, A&P IA, CTO
RV4 wing in Jig @ KPOC
RV7 emp built
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-25-2009, 10:30 AM
Mel's Avatar
Mel Mel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,762
Default

To be imported under amateur-built, the aircraft must meet all FAA requirements, including the major portion rule.
I have imported several from Canada but never one from Africa.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-25-2009, 11:49 AM
pierre smith's Avatar
pierre smith pierre smith is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Louisville, Ga
Posts: 7,840
Default It's an EAA designation..

Quote:
Originally Posted by Norman CYYJ View Post
Pierre, what is a tech c....green?
.
......that our EAA bestows on you after you've met some requirements like having built a couple of airplanes and so on. I was just approved when I put that on my tag line...I was "green...." a newbie.

We look at a builders' projects at the different stages and give advice on how to correct things and ways to properly do certain tasks like baffling, sealing firewall penetrations safely to contain FWF fires and so on. It's a voluntary free service that we provide to builders and leave them a copy of the visit/inspections...the DAR's like to see these at inspection time. It's another way of having a safely built airplane...oftentimes life saving advice.

Regards,
__________________
Pierre Smith
RV-10, 510 TT
RV6A (Sojourner) 180 HP, Catto 3 Bl (502Hrs), gone...and already missed
Air Tractor AT 502B PT 6-15 Sold
Air Tractor 402 PT-6-20 Sold
EAA Flight Advisor/CFI/Tech Counselor
Louisville, Ga

It's never skill or craftsmanship that completes airplanes, it's the will to do so,
Patrick Kenny, EAA 275132


Dues gladly paid!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-25-2009, 06:08 PM
Vlad's Avatar
Vlad Vlad is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Utah
Posts: 8,145
Default Almost identical Q was asked

by a European. They do not have 51 rule either and are exploring the waters of professional building - RV airframes only. Painted, no engine,no avionics,no interior. They have necessary facilities and skilled riveters, assemblers and painters.

Based on my experience with FWF, the airframe is 25% and firewall forward is other 95%... What do you say on that one Mel? Do those guys have a chance?



Quote:
Originally Posted by pierre smith View Post
....a friend has an interesting question that I don't have an answer for.

Since South Africa doesn't have a 51% requirement, there are quite a few RV's already built and more being professionally built there.

The question is this: Would the airplane be able to be registered over here if it were imported by an American buyer after the owner sold it to the new buyer?

Thanks,
__________________
Where is N666BK?

Не имей сто рублей, а имей сто друзей.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-25-2009, 08:16 PM
Mel's Avatar
Mel Mel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,762
Default Not quite!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vladyspassky View Post
Based on my experience with FWF, the airframe is 25% and firewall forward is other 95%... What do you say on that one Mel? Do those guys have a chance?
I don't think they would pass the 8000-38 form.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:24 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.