|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

03-23-2009, 02:28 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Fountain Hills, arizona
Posts: 116
|
|
25 hour test requirement instead of the 40 hours
I?m getting close to the certification of my RV8A.
My DAR has asked if I can correlate the engine and propeller combination (vans parts) with any kind of production aircraft.
This would allow him by similarities to only require a 25 hour test requirement instead of the 40 hours.
Have any of you run across this before?
Do you have a solution that I can offer to the DAR to only require the 25 hour flight test?
Below are the engine and propeller combination that I purchased from Vans.
Experimental O-360 180HP
LYC XO-360-A1A
Compact hub Constant-speed prop for (I)O-360 (180/200hp) 74"
PROP C2YR-1BFP/F7497
thanks
|

03-23-2009, 02:38 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
|
|
You can stop right at the engine. The LYC XO-360-A1A is an experimental engine, thus you get 40 hours.
The regs state that to get 25 hours you must have a certified engine - prop combination. Meaning that if you could pull an engine and prop right from a certified aircraft and stick in your homebuilt, you get 25 hours. Since you opted for the experimental Lycoming, even though it is identical to a certified O-360-A1A, you get 40 hours, regardless of what prop you stick on it.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
Last edited by N941WR : 03-23-2009 at 03:11 PM.
|

03-23-2009, 02:39 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Posts: 3,152
|
|
"LYC XO-" does it for me. You're not going to find one of those on anything certified.
__________________
Scott Card
CQ Headset by Card Machine Works
CMW E-Lift
RV-9A N4822C flying 2200+hrs. / Cedar Park, TX
RV8 Building - fuselage / showplanes canopy (Done!)
|

03-23-2009, 02:59 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lake St. Louis, MO.
Posts: 2,346
|
|
I experienced this same issue. Van's directed me to Hartzell Propeller Inc. for pertinent data. The link includes a list of propellers for use in RV's. http://www.hartzellprop.com/kitplane/index_kitplane.htm
I called Hartzell and was told specific approved engine/prop combo information can be accessed at the FAA. I never could figure out how to access that information.
In any event, my DAR approved the 25 hour test period when he understood the OEM YIO-360-MIB I purchased through Van's and shipped directly from Lycoming is essentially identical to a "certified" engine. Apparently other builders have used DAR's that do not see things the same way. Lucky me.
__________________
Rick Galati
RV6A N307R"Darla!"
RV-8 N308R "LuLu"
EAA Technical Counselor
|

03-23-2009, 03:46 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Luis Obispo, CA
Posts: 159
|
|
If the DAR elects to issue a 25 hour flight test period even if the engine/prop combination otherwise requires a 40 hour flight test, where does that leave the builder? Does he have to follow the regs which require 40 hours? Or can he sign it into Phase 2 after 25 hours based on his operating limitations?
I'm using a Subaru engine and a carbon Sensenich prop, but my DAR issued me a 25 hour flight test period.
Thoughts?
Paul
|

03-23-2009, 04:16 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Posts: 3,152
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrblob
I'm using a Subaru engine and a carbon Sensenich prop, but my DAR issued me a 25 hour flight test period.
Thoughts?
Paul
|
My thoughts: Wow.
__________________
Scott Card
CQ Headset by Card Machine Works
CMW E-Lift
RV-9A N4822C flying 2200+hrs. / Cedar Park, TX
RV8 Building - fuselage / showplanes canopy (Done!)
|

03-23-2009, 04:26 PM
|
 |
been here awhile
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 4,300
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrblob
I'm using a Subaru engine and a carbon Sensenich prop, but my DAR issued me a 25 hour flight test period.
|
Amazing.................
In regard to your original question, if your op lims say twenty-five hours, that is all you are legally obligated to fly in Phase one........I guess......it's difficult to understand the rational of the DAR...............
Last edited by Sam Buchanan : 03-23-2009 at 04:30 PM.
|

03-23-2009, 05:45 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,762
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrblob
I'm using a Subaru engine and a carbon Sensenich prop, but my DAR issued me a 25 hour flight test period.
Paul
|
My first thought is that your DAR may not be one for long. A DAR may require MORE hours but he cannot approve LESS!
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
|

03-23-2009, 06:57 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,275
|
|
Since you know that you should use 40 hours why not call the DAR and have the time corrected?
|

03-23-2009, 07:05 PM
|
 |
fugio ergo sum
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Carlsbad, NM
Posts: 1,912
|
|
What is the problem?
Nothing about having been issued a 25 hour test period means that you have to take a passenger up at 25.1 hours. Fly your test program and get confident with the airplane. That should take longer than 40 hours anyway.
I wonder how many hours Kevin Horton is into his test program now? Probably a lot more than 25 hours and it is with traditional parts.
__________________
Larry Pardue
Carlsbad, NM
RV-6 N441LP Flying
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:24 AM.
|