|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

03-03-2009, 06:58 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Alviso, CA
Posts: 405
|
|
E-Mag / P-Mag service Bulletin - Help appreciated
I'm trying to perform the check on my E/P mags in the least invasive way and hopefully without breaking anything. Check this link for background:
Bulletin 09/12/08
I've got 113s
The concepts of what I am trying to do are perfectly clear to me, but due to my wrenching lameness, I'm having some difficulty with the actual doing.
Questions for those who have done this:
Am I going to have to pull the mags out to do this check?
What optical tool, if any, am I going to need to look through the slit and see the mechanics?
If I need to pull the mags, any precautions to keep from screwing up the timing?
Any other words of wisdom?
__________________
Steve Brown
N598SD - RV9A second owner
O-320, 9:1 pistons, Catto 3 blade
KRHV - Reid Hillview airport, San Jose, CA
|

03-03-2009, 07:27 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
|
|
Steve,
If you haven't had your 113's back for service since last fall you will probably need the updates.
For $25 it is well worth it to remove them and send them in for the update.
BTW, it shouldn't take long, Emag Air turns them around quickly.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
|

03-03-2009, 12:37 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: santa barbara, CA
Posts: 1,681
|
|
Steve
its not clear from your post why you would need to check the mags to see if the service bulletin was done - did you recently purchase the plane and are unsure if the previous owner had it done? If so, it may be as easy as getting the serial numbers of the units and calling emag to see if they have a record of it.
If you still need to do the check, removal of the units is not too difficult - loosen up the two mounting nuts, and they will come right out. Be careful to have enough slack in the wires for handling when you pull them off - you can then remove the wires either individually with their individual clamping screws or as a group by unscrewing the receptacle where they enter the unit.
You will need to retime them when you replace them, but thats very easy with the blow-in-the- tube method, following the instructions in the manual, which I believe is available on their website.
Buckle down and do it if you need to - you will learn how, and next time you wont think twice about it. Get Brad at Emag to talk you through it if necessary
erich
|

03-09-2009, 01:12 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Alviso, CA
Posts: 405
|
|
Thanks guys & more questions
As suggested, I bit the bullet and just pulled the mags to send them in.
They are held in with a bracket, I'm guessing that has some springiness.
How many ft/# do I torque them back down?
Any special precautions?
I noticed that unlike every other important bolt/nut in the airplane, there is no safety wire or cotter pin, only a wimpy lock washer.
Is this normal?
Other words of wisdom?
__________________
Steve Brown
N598SD - RV9A second owner
O-320, 9:1 pistons, Catto 3 blade
KRHV - Reid Hillview airport, San Jose, CA
|

03-09-2009, 01:21 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
|
|
Steve,
Those are 5/16" 18 TPI studs. The nut gets torqued to 204 In lbs / 17 Ft lbs.
The stud should be torqued to 25 Ft lbs, if it comes out.
No safety wire required but I do replace the internal star washer every time I pull mine.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
|

03-09-2009, 02:28 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: santa barbara, CA
Posts: 1,681
|
|
Consider using an all-metal lock nut instead of the standard issue for peace of mind. Do not use a Nylok - no good for high heat areas.
erich
|

03-09-2009, 04:23 PM
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Locust Grove, GA
Posts: 2,624
|
|
Assuming the PMags use the same engine studs as a standard magneto, you should NOT use metal self-locking nuts. Just use standard hardware with lock washers, and use some torque seal. If you use self-locking nuts, there is the potential for the studs to back out when loosening the nuts.
Vic
__________________
 Vic Syracuse
Built RV-4, RV-6, 2-RV-10's, RV-7A, RV-8, Prescott Pusher, Kitfox Model II, Kitfox Speedster, Kitfox 7 Super Sport, Just Superstol, DAR, A&P/IA, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor, CFII-ASMEL/ASES
Kitplanes "Unairworthy" monthly feature
EAA Sport Aviation "Checkpoints" column
EAA Homebuilt Council Chair/member EAA BOD
Author "Pre-Buy Guide for Amateur-Built Aircraft"
www.Baselegaviation.com
|

03-10-2009, 06:28 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Alviso, CA
Posts: 405
|
|
Thanks again & more questions
17 ft/lbs, replace washers, use torque seal. Assume "star" refers to toothed washers.
Any preference between internal verses external teeth?
One mag has bolts, the other has studs and nuts. I didn't notice any way to get hold of the studs to tighten them. Maybe I missed it.
I have no reason to believe they are loose, but how do I get hold of the studs to check torque?
What flavor of torque seal is recommended?
More ignorance on my part, but I was shocked at the seemingly haphazard way these guys attach to the block. I've never heard of a mag falling off a motor, so I guess its more robust than it looks.
Thanks again!
__________________
Steve Brown
N598SD - RV9A second owner
O-320, 9:1 pistons, Catto 3 blade
KRHV - Reid Hillview airport, San Jose, CA
|

03-11-2009, 12:12 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Poulsbo, WA
Posts: 208
|
|
torque for hold down nuts
Quote:
|
Those are 5/16" 18 TPI studs. The nut gets torqued to 204 In lbs / 17 Ft lbs.
|
I use 150 in-lbs based on following:
The hold down studs for E/P-Mag are same as used for standard mag installation. Lycoming overhaul manual has 150 in-lbs as torque limit for 5/16 nuts, which is consistent with article posted on Sacramento Sky Ranch article on mag installation that states "....tighten the magneto hold-down nuts firmly (maximum torque is 150 inch/lbs., minimum is 110 inch/lbs.) "
|

03-11-2009, 04:27 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OneCharlieKilo
I use 150 in-lbs based on following:
The hold down studs for E/P-Mag are same as used for standard mag installation. Lycoming overhaul manual has 150 in-lbs as torque limit for 5/16 nuts, which is consistent with article posted on Sacramento Sky Ranch article on mag installation that states "....tighten the magneto hold-down nuts firmly (maximum torque is 150 inch/lbs., minimum is 110 inch/lbs.) "
|
Chris,
Check Table I on the Service Table of Limits, Standard Torque in the Direct Drive Engine Overhaul Manual, page 1-37 in my manual.
It lists the torque for 5/16 threads as 204 in-lbs/17 ft-lbs and Table V lists the minimum driving torque for the studs as 25 ft-lbs.
In checking the Lycoming manual again, I could find no reference to 150 in-lbs.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:01 AM.
|