VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Traditional Aircraft Engines
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-28-2009, 05:28 PM
Sheldon's Avatar
Sheldon Sheldon is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Concho, Arizona
Posts: 177
Default Lycoming intake hose length

Ordered from ACS p/n 69603 Lyc intake hose's... Oh oh..they are shorter than the orginals on my 0-360...!! Orginal ones were 2 3/8" long.. the 69603's are just...1 3/4"... The longer ones covered both swages on the sumps tubes with the hose clamp inbetween them... These shorter ones won't allow the hose to cover both swages without being too short for the intake tube's connection... So I adjusted the hose to 'just at' the inter swage with the clamp behind the outer swage... Seems to work ok... Anyone with info..???
Thanks, Sheldon
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-28-2009, 05:59 PM
zilik's Avatar
zilik zilik is offline
VAF Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pine Junction, CO
Posts: 655
Default Whoa There Boy

Sheldon,

Sounds to me like you have the wrong ones for your application. I don't think I would trust that they would not slip off since they don't go over the beads in the tubes. Maybe Malon will chime in with the correct part number for your engine.
__________________
Gary "Seismo" Zilik
Pine Junction, Colorado
RV-6A N99PZ S/N 22993 SOLD
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-28-2009, 09:24 PM
az_gila's Avatar
az_gila az_gila is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 57AZ - NW Tucson area
Posts: 10,011
Question Perhaps your tubes...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheldon View Post
Ordered from ACS p/n 69603 Lyc intake hose's... Oh oh..they are shorter than the orginals on my 0-360...!! Orginal ones were 2 3/8" long.. the 69603's are just...1 3/4"... The longer ones covered both swages on the sumps tubes with the hose clamp inbetween them... These shorter ones won't allow the hose to cover both swages without being too short for the intake tube's connection... So I adjusted the hose to 'just at' the inter swage with the clamp behind the outer swage... Seems to work ok... Anyone with info..???
Thanks, Sheldon
...are not correct...

You do not say which O-360 you have, but the 69603 number is correct for all of the -A models, and they are 1.75 inches long.

Are you sure your original assemble was correct?

What model are we talking about?
__________________
Gil Alexander
EAA Technical Counselor, Airframe Mechanic
Half completed RV-10 QB purchased
RV-6A N61GX - finally flying
Grumman Tiger N12GA - flying
La Cholla Airpark (57AZ) Tucson AZ
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-01-2009, 07:22 AM
Sheldon's Avatar
Sheldon Sheldon is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Concho, Arizona
Posts: 177
Default

My engine is an 0-360-C2E...Built up from certified parts... I emailed my engine builder and he said the Lycoming parts book call for the hoses p/n 69603 @ 1 3/4" long... And that's all I could find at any supplier..... His reply to me:

"Sheldon
Lycoming used to make them longer?
Somebody sorted out what appeared to be 1 3/4?
Search me?
I do not remmember longer hoses.
Parts Books say 1 3/4."

I went ahead and put them on.. Making sure the clamps did their job... Runs fine... As I see it, there is no way they can slip.. The distance between the inlet tube and the connecting tube on the sump is only about 1/8" gap...
Anyway, anyone with their cowl off might measure them and post here how long they are... One of those history misterys...
Sheldon
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-01-2009, 08:02 AM
osxuser's Avatar
osxuser osxuser is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pasadena CA
Posts: 2,484
Default

I've never seen a double swaged intake tube in my life! That sounds like an aftermarket mod to me.
__________________
Stephen Samuelian, CFII, A&P IA, CTO
RV4 wing in Jig @ KPOC
RV7 emp built
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-01-2009, 08:21 AM
Sheldon's Avatar
Sheldon Sheldon is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Concho, Arizona
Posts: 177
Default

The double swagged tube is only on the tube(s) from the sump...there are none on the intake tubes to the head... The hose (1 3/4" long) fit over the outer swage and the clamp is behind (inboard)... The hose just bumps up to the inboard swage.. Maybe someone in the past over swagged these sump tubes... ??
Sheldon
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-01-2009, 09:45 AM
az_gila's Avatar
az_gila az_gila is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 57AZ - NW Tucson area
Posts: 10,011
Smile My parts book...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheldon View Post
My engine is an 0-360-C2E...Built up from certified parts... I emailed my engine builder and he said the Lycoming parts book call for the hoses p/n 69603 @ 1 3/4" long... And that's all I could find at any supplier..... His reply to me:

"Sheldon
Lycoming used to make them longer?
Somebody sorted out what appeared to be 1 3/4?
Search me?
I do not remmember longer hoses.
Parts Books say 1 3/4."

I went ahead and put them on.. Making sure the clamps did their job... Runs fine... As I see it, there is no way they can slip.. The distance between the inlet tube and the connecting tube on the sump is only about 1/8" gap...
Anyway, anyone with their cowl off might measure them and post here how long they are... One of those history misterys...
Sheldon
...says the 69603 number is correct at 1.75 inches long for your model.

However, I have seen certified rebuilders create their own parts by cutting from a stock of the appropriate Mil-Spec hose....
__________________
Gil Alexander
EAA Technical Counselor, Airframe Mechanic
Half completed RV-10 QB purchased
RV-6A N61GX - finally flying
Grumman Tiger N12GA - flying
La Cholla Airpark (57AZ) Tucson AZ
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-01-2009, 01:28 PM
Sheldon's Avatar
Sheldon Sheldon is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Concho, Arizona
Posts: 177
Default

Gil..think that's what might be...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-01-2009, 02:28 PM
HROCKLEN HROCKLEN is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: woodbridge ct.
Posts: 4
Default

THE INTAKE TUBES FROM A320 LYC. ARE A HALF IN. SHORTER THAN A 360
LYC. BECAUSE OF THE DIFF.OF THE STROKE.I THINK YOU HAVE THE WRONG INTAKE TUBES &SOMEONE HAS HAS SUBSTITUDED LONGER RUBBER COUPLINGS TO MAKE UP DIFFERENCE.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-01-2009, 03:44 PM
Sheldon's Avatar
Sheldon Sheldon is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Concho, Arizona
Posts: 177
Default

Well if the gap is only 1/8 inch from the tubes from the sump..how can that be that they are shorter? There isn't a 1/2 inch gap...! I think the inlet tubes from the cylinders are the correct ones...
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:47 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.