VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-18-2009, 05:06 PM
hevansrv7a's Avatar
hevansrv7a hevansrv7a is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,587
Default Nose Gear SB - Observations and Wondering

I recently completed the nose gear SB on my 7A and it all went very well. Everything fitted including my NG fairing.

I thought it was not the answer to the problem but did it for insurance and re-sale reasons and because I don't actually know that it won't help.

I noticed a few changes.

With the old fork, I usually got a momentary resonance, kind of like a shaking, after take off while around 90 kts and climbing and accelerating. I don't get it any more.

The new set up seems a little stiffer to me and just feels a little stronger. I've only flown from pavement so this is not a real test, just an impression.

These two things got me thinking that shortening the lower, vertical portion of the NG leg means that less bending moment can be applied by rearward pressure on the wheel. In effect, if true, that makes the long, diagonal part less prone to flex under pressure. I know it flexes upward because of the rubbing on the leg fairing from the intersection fairing, but I am talking about possibly having less bending down, trying to follow the fork under aft-pointing loads.

I'm no engineer - not even close. What to those of you who are engineers think about that?
__________________
H. Evan's RV-7A N17HH 240+ hours
"
We can lift ourselves out of ignorance, we can find ourselves as creatures of excellence and intelligence and skill. We can be free! We can learn to fly!" -J.L. Seagull
Paid $25.00 "dues" net of PayPal cost for 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 (December).
This airplane is for sale: see website. my website

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-18-2009, 06:55 PM
AlexPeterson's Avatar
AlexPeterson AlexPeterson is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Maple Grove, MN
Posts: 2,331
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hevansrv7a View Post
snip

These two things got me thinking that shortening the lower, vertical portion of the NG leg means that less bending moment can be applied by rearward pressure on the wheel. In effect, if true, that makes the long, diagonal part less prone to flex under pressure. I know it flexes upward because of the rubbing on the leg fairing from the intersection fairing, but I am talking about possibly having less bending down, trying to follow the fork under aft-pointing loads.

snip
The wheel is in the same position relative to the nose gear as it was before, so no change in the stresses applied to the nose gear. I.e., the gear is shorter but the fork weldment still puts the tire in the same place relative to it. Make sense? The change is though you took a saw to the bottom of the gear/weldment as an assembly, and hacked off an inch.
__________________
Alex Peterson
RV6A N66AP 1700+ hours
KADC, Wadena, MN
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-18-2009, 07:53 PM
JDAviator JDAviator is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Land O Lakes, FL
Posts: 27
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hevansrv7a View Post
With the old fork, I usually got a momentary resonance, kind of like a shaking, after take off while around 90 kts and climbing and accelerating. I don't get it any more.
Did the resonance / shaking only occur on takeoff? If so, I'm thinking your nose wheel was shaking due to imbalance or possibly a loose axle. You may have corrected either when you installed the new leg.
__________________
Jerry Allison
X39 FL
RV-12
N127RV
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-18-2009, 09:09 PM
hevansrv7a's Avatar
hevansrv7a hevansrv7a is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,587
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JDAviator View Post
Did the resonance / shaking only occur on takeoff? If so, I'm thinking your nose wheel was shaking due to imbalance or possibly a loose axle. You may have corrected either when you installed the new leg.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex Peterson;
The wheel is in the same position relative to the nose gear as it was before, so no change in the stresses applied to the nose gear. I.e., the gear is shorter but the fork weldment still puts the tire in the same place relative to it. Make sense? The change is though you took a saw to the bottom of the gear/weldment as an assembly, and hacked off an inch.
Yes the wheel axle is in the same position, but the force is applied a little higher, about half an inch. Right? What if the axle were in the same position but the down part was only an inch total length? Conversely, what if the axle were in the same position but the fork reached almost to the ground?

My axle was not loose; the torque was the same and I haven't balanced the wheel. Good idea, but not persuasive. Yes, only on take off, so wheel rotation as a factor makes sense except that it would have stopped long before that - it is off the ground even before the mains and the nose wheel has a lot of friction by design.
__________________
H. Evan's RV-7A N17HH 240+ hours
"
We can lift ourselves out of ignorance, we can find ourselves as creatures of excellence and intelligence and skill. We can be free! We can learn to fly!" -J.L. Seagull
Paid $25.00 "dues" net of PayPal cost for 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 (December).
This airplane is for sale: see website. my website

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-19-2009, 06:38 AM
AlexPeterson's Avatar
AlexPeterson AlexPeterson is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Maple Grove, MN
Posts: 2,331
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hevansrv7a View Post
Yes the wheel axle is in the same position, but the force is applied a little higher, about half an inch. Right? What if the axle were in the same position but the down part was only an inch total length? Conversely, what if the axle were in the same position but the fork reached almost to the ground?

Snip
Good question, but the bending moments applied to the nose gear are only a function of where the tire is, provided that the top of the fork still remains in the same place. Even if the top of the fork were lowered, the angled portion of the gear leg would still see the same bending moments. If the fork reached almost to the ground (and it didn't dig in!), nothing would be changed. I know this seems at first a little unreasonable, but it is indeed the case. This would be a bit easier to explain using paper and pencil (and beer).
__________________
Alex Peterson
RV6A N66AP 1700+ hours
KADC, Wadena, MN
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-19-2009, 12:22 PM
Chino Tom's Avatar
Chino Tom Chino Tom is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 738
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hevansrv7a View Post

With the old fork, I usually got a momentary resonance, kind of like a shaking, after take off while around 90 kts and climbing and accelerating. I don't get it any more.
I get the same shake on my -8A and i have the new fork. I'm sure it's the nose wheel spinning with no load (out of balance). And it quickly subsides. It is not the mains because I tap the brakes after takeoff.
__________________
Tom Prokop
Chino, CA
RV-8A,180/CS/Carb, AFS 4500 EFIS/EMS
RV-6, sold, 820 hrs of fun.

Last edited by Chino Tom : 02-19-2009 at 12:23 PM. Reason: spacing
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:21 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.