VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Traditional Aircraft Engines
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-25-2009, 12:21 AM
Flyrod Flyrod is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 250
Thumbs up One to Watch

I attended the Sebring LSA fly in this past weekend and had the pleasure of meeting Tim Archer the past CEO of Superior engines and was very instrumental in bringing us the Superior XP engine. He has accepted the CEO position at Powerplant Developments and is promoting their Gemini opposed piston diesel engine. Mr. Archer has been an American aircraft engine executive for many years from Teledyne to Superior to Powerplant Developments. His experience is hard to match and his confidence in the Gemini engine speaks volumes.



This engine is a most interesting design. I once sailed aboard ships that used this design in generators sets made by Fairbanks. Its successful implementation as a diesel engine has been well documented. According to Mr. Archer, developments in metallurgy have allowed PD to lighten the engine to aircraft requirements.



This will be one to watch. Tim Archer may be involved in another home run. An aircraft engine that eliminates cam shafts, valve trains, mags and spark plugs, cylinder heads, and vapor lock certainly has my attention. They have over 2,500 hours between three operating engines thus far. These three engines are 100hp and only 15lbs heavier than the Rotax 912S, but stay tuned because the 200hp is in the works and all indications are it will be lighter and smaller than our lycomings!
__________________
RV8 "Gladder's Gal" #80707
Superior IO360 B1B 193 HP, Whirlwind 151-69"
IFR-Dual Cheltons, Crossbow NAV 425EX
Garmin 430/SL30/330 Mode-S w/ traffic
Ryan 9900B TCAS, WSI AV300, S-Tec 55X

Searey 80 HP
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-25-2009, 01:02 AM
63scrounger 63scrounger is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 24
Smile Hopefull!

I am encouraged by this development. I was sad to see Superior get bought out by Lycoming. Now to see this...It's good to see something good come of this.
__________________
I'm just grateful to be here.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-25-2009, 04:58 AM
N661DJ N661DJ is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Winter Haven
Posts: 336
Default Superior

I may be incorrect, however, I Understand, Lycoming purchased ONLY Superior's inventory, not the company. A good way to eliminate competition??
Dick
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-25-2009, 06:44 AM
Brantel's Avatar
Brantel Brantel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Newport, TN
Posts: 7,496
Default

Good way to pick up a company without the burden of assuming the liabilities and warranty claims!

Quote:
Originally Posted by N661DJ View Post
I may be incorrect, however, I Understand, Lycoming purchased ONLY Superior's inventory, not the company. A good way to eliminate competition??
Dick
__________________
Brantel (Brian Chesteen),
Check out my RV-10 builder's BLOG
RV-10, #41942, N?????, Project Sold
---------------------------------------------------------------------
RV-7/TU, #72823, N159SB
Lyc. O-360 carbed, HARTZELL BA CS Prop, Dual P-MAGs, Dual Garmin G3X Touch
Track N159SB (KK4LIF)
Like EAA Chapter 1494 on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-25-2009, 07:18 AM
L.Adamson's Avatar
L.Adamson L.Adamson is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: KSLC
Posts: 4,021
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brantel View Post
Good way to pick up a company without the burden of assuming the liabilities and warranty claims!
Which is how it should be....................since Lycoming didn't make the profit ( to cover expenses) on each unit previously sold.

L.Adamson
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-25-2009, 08:04 AM
Tony Spicer Tony Spicer is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 514
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyrod View Post
These three engines are 100hp and only 15lbs heavier than the Rotax 912S, but stay tuned because the 200hp is in the works and all indications are it will be lighter and smaller than our lycomings!
More engine info here: http://www.ppdgemini.com/
.
.
.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-25-2009, 08:12 AM
breister breister is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,231
Default

Nice...

275hp @ 320lbs!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-25-2009, 09:27 AM
rv9aviator rv9aviator is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,505
Default

I'm not sure the added super charger and or turbo charger plus liquid cooling may make the total moving parts count as much or more than a conventional engine. The fuel economy and lack of needing 100LL is definitely a big plus.
__________________
Jim Wright
RV-9A N9JW 90919 SoldArkansas
http://www.jimsairplanes.com
_______________________
"It's a brutal struggle for the biscuit."
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-26-2009, 01:05 AM
rv8or rv8or is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Norwich England
Posts: 155
Default Vibration harmonics

Petrol engine combustion burn, i.e. (slowly) against diesel explosion (fast). Prop engine combinations would need to be well tested for harmonics. The age old method to dampen harmonics is to add mass or in the case of the Thiebert was a prop shaft damper.

just my tuppence worth

I do hope that they suceed

Rob
RV8 VERY slow build
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-26-2009, 06:57 AM
breister breister is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,231
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rv8or View Post
Petrol engine combustion burn, i.e. (slowly) against diesel explosion (fast). Prop engine combinations would need to be well tested for harmonics. The age old method to dampen harmonics is to add mass or in the case of the Thiebert was a prop shaft damper.

just my tuppence worth

I do hope that they suceed

Rob
RV8 VERY slow build
I believe the Gemini reduces this in two ways; one is because it is a two-stroke (twice as many power pulses) although that only makes the 2-cylinder act like a 4-cylinder 4 stroke, and because it is a geared engine (again increasing the total number of power pulses per prop revolution).

But you are right - a lot of testing will need to be done. Still, I can get excited about the power-to-weight ratio. Maybe by the time I need an overhaul these toys will be ready for prime time. I would love to shove 275 turbonormalized ponies in in place of the 170 normally aspirated ones I have now!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:09 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.