|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

01-20-2009, 02:55 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,116
|
|
cowl to spinner height
This is the first place I've come across where the Orndoff video says something that is really at-odds with what the plans say.
In the video, when George is fitting the upper cowl, he drills some temporary alum strips and uses spacers so the front edge of the cowl is sitting 1/8" above the rear spinner plate. I quote: "...this held the cowling an eighth of an inch higher than the spinner plate".
Now, the plans definately say "Block the forward end up to be 1/8" to 3/16" BELOW the spinner to allow for future engine sag" (I added the capital letters for emphasis).
The only way both of these can be correct is if the spinner is 1/4" thick (so 1/8" above the spinner plate is the same as 1/8" below the surface of the spinner). The spinner is less than 1/8" thick.
Ordinarily I'd just follow the plans without question, but other have testified, and I've found, that the methods in the Orndoff videos are never wrong.
What's the deal here? Has the cowling design changed since the orndoff video was made? Should the top forward edge of my cowl be above, below, or flush with the outside surface of my spinner?
__________________
Phil
RV9A (SB)
Flying since July 2010!
Ottawa, Canada
|

01-20-2009, 10:55 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Twin Falls, ID
Posts: 683
|
|
Set my spinner 3/16 above the cowl and after 100 hours it is exactly level with the cowl. Don
__________________
RV 7 N212MD Flying as of 12/22/2007
Backcountry/TCOW Super Cub flying 03/12/2011
Next project?
|

01-21-2009, 11:11 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: santa barbara, CA
Posts: 1,681
|
|
Ditto on Yakdriver's response
erich
|

01-21-2009, 11:27 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Pakenham, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 586
|
|
Yep, me three 
__________________
Mark
RV-8 C-GURV (Flying since Nov 2004) - Sold 
Scratch building 4pl Bearhawk
Flying a '79 Maule M5-235C
President EAA Chapter 245
|

01-21-2009, 12:14 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,642
|
|
There are a ton of threads on this issue re: engine sag. The long and short of these threads is that it depends on whether you have a conical or dynafocal mount and whether you are using the cheap Van's isolators or good Lord isolators. Different combinations of the above will result in a lot of sag on one hand or little to no sag on the other hand. Good luck.
__________________
Steve M.
Ellensburg WA
RV-9 Flying, 0-320, Catto
Donation reminder: Jan. 2021
|

01-26-2009, 06:35 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 46
|
|
Phil,
As Steve M. said in last post there has been a ton of discussion on this. I made my decision based on mounts. I used Lord mounts which have a history of the least amount of sag and went with a difference of 1/8".
Steve
|

01-26-2009, 08:38 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,116
|
|
OK, thanks guys... I used Vans' mounts, and have set my cowl 1/8" higher than spinner to compensate for future sag.
Cowling fitting is a long and big job, but it seems to be going well. All the firewall hinges are done, now just those long side seams to finish. Then it's on to baffling!
__________________
Phil
RV9A (SB)
Flying since July 2010!
Ottawa, Canada
|

01-26-2009, 08:47 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Victoria B.C.
Posts: 1,265
|
|
You want the cowling below the spinner NOT above. I think that is what you meant.
|

01-26-2009, 02:19 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,116
|
|
Yep, sorry that's what I meant.
__________________
Phil
RV9A (SB)
Flying since July 2010!
Ottawa, Canada
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:09 AM.
|