|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

01-18-2009, 07:10 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 106
|
|
brake pad wear
In the middle of annual condition inspection. 101.4 hrs RV-9A, cleavland mains. I went ahead and replaced brake pads because I had them on hand.
I miked the new vs the old and there was .030"-.035" wear on the old.
Was it time? or should I have tried to get more out of them?
thanks
doug
|

01-18-2009, 07:22 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,762
|
|
Check the "wear" notches.
Your brake pads should have a notch at each end. When the pads are worn down to the bottom of the notch, you're getting close to the rivets. That's the time to change.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
|

01-18-2009, 07:28 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 106
|
|
Mel:
The originals did not have the notch, nor did the replacements I got from Vans (groves).
Maybe I should ask "how deep is the notch"?
thanks
doug
N625DK
|

01-18-2009, 07:46 PM
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hangar/home at Hicks Airfield (T67), Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 629
|
|
Van's Brake Pads
The last set I received from Van's had no notch (wear indicator?). I ordered a set from Grove when I ordered my new nosewheel and the Grove set have no notch either.
There IS a chamfered edge which is much harder to see. The depth of the chamfered edge is about the same depth as the notch from an older set of pads I checked.
__________________
Mike Reddick
VAF#153
Pilots N Paws Pilot
RV6A N167CW 1,900 HRS
Ft Worth, TX (T67)
|

01-18-2009, 08:30 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,762
|
|
Sorry;
I've always used Rapco. I thought they all had the notches.
I get them from Aircraft Spruce, $22.85/set of 4.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
Last edited by Mel : 01-18-2009 at 08:56 PM.
|

01-18-2009, 09:08 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,685
|
|
I replace them every year at annual time
I have had two brake incidents on my RV-6A. The first was my fault I tried to stretch usage to the maximum and they wore too thin on the right side (the side that gets the most wear because of the natural action to apply the right brake with the right takeoff rudder)so the fluid was able to leak out around the piston O-ring. I won't go into the details but I can vouch for the plane's ability to turn tight circles with one brake applied. The brakes are so important on an "A" model and you only see them once a year that I find it safer just to replace them. Their cost is microscopic for the work they do on these tens of thousands of dollar airplanes. Replacing them is a mandatory line item on my condition inspection checklist. Your flight operations are unique so your wear per hour and hour per year numbers may justify some other maintenance schedule but you should develop a check/replacement schedule and stick to it.
Oh the second incident ...well that was a broken tube flare during landing at Prescott, AZ on a trip to California. The linings were not a factor.
Bob Axsom
|

01-18-2009, 09:20 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,009
|
|
Bob:
they wore too thin on the right side (the side that gets the most wear because of the natural action to apply the right brake with the right takeoff rudder)so the fluid was able to leak out around the piston O-ring.
How did brake pad wear lead to seal failure. This may be important to those of us that like to see 200-300 hours on a set of pads. I'd rather replace the pads early than risk brake failure.
Terry, CFI
RV9A, N323TP
|

01-18-2009, 09:24 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Mateo, CA
Posts: 1,419
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by terrykohler
Bob:
they wore too thin on the right side (the side that gets the most wear because of the natural action to apply the right brake with the right takeoff rudder)so the fluid was able to leak out around the piston O-ring.
How did brake pad wear lead to seal failure. This may be important to those of us that like to see 200-300 hours on a set of pads. I'd rather replace the pads early than risk brake failure.
Terry, CFI
RV9A, N323TP
|
If the pad gets too thin, the o-ring can pop out and lose all the pressure.
That said, I was careful to have a slight forward bias on my rudder pedal angles. I just replaced my pads with 225 hrs on my first set of pads - there was still a lot of wear left (I forget how much - but definitely well under the Cleveland limits), but I figured this was the right annual. Every six months I'd check them and be surprised they were still holding up. I do lots of short flights even...
Definitely not good to push pad life, but if you are careful to not ride the brakes there is no reason to think an A model RV will go through lots of pads.
Last edited by kevinh : 01-18-2009 at 09:35 PM.
|

01-18-2009, 09:24 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
|
|
This is one of the few things I didn't photograph during my condition inspection.
With the taildragger -9 at 190 hours and 302 landings in the first year the brakes looked almost brand new. Heck, even the tires still had the part lines on the center. (Yes, I did rotate the tires and brake pads.)
I attribute this to the tail wheel steering and the low landing speeds of the -9 rather than pilot skill or some such BS.
All that said, there is nothing wrong with replacing the brakes early, you did the right thing. Save the set you removed and when you order a new pair for next year's annual, compare them. What you don't want to do is expose the rivets, they can damage the rotors, if the pads wear down enough.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
|

01-18-2009, 10:05 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Senoia, Georgia
Posts: 800
|
|
A quick check of the online Cleveland Wheels & Brakes maintenance manual shows that 0.100" is the minimum lining thickness.
Jerry
RV-8 N84JE 290 hours and a ton of landings on the original pads.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:09 AM.
|