VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-23-2005, 07:45 PM
vlittle's Avatar
vlittle vlittle is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Victoria, Canada
Posts: 2,247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tobinbasford
For those keeping count, another "a" model flipped over yesterday while landing at the fly-in at Reklaw. I believe it was a 7a. I didn't see it happen but saw the plane after it happend. Hundreds of planes showed up, everything from cessnas, pipers, beech, Rv's, etc. The strip is kinda rough towards the north end. Other "a" models landed there without trouble. Not sure who it was, but I think they're ok.

Tobin
I know Van's position on this topic: it's all about pilot technique. I think, however, there is some anecdotal evidence that the A's are prone to this problem.

I had a good look at a Grumman Cheetah today, which also uses a castering nosewheel. The gear is larger diameter, a presumably stronger. The gross weight of a Cheetah is higher than most of the A models.

What was substantially different, however, is that the top of the nose gear strut was hinged at the firewall attach point, and two small oleo struts were attached several inches below that point to provide support and shock absorbtion.

On a hard impact the strut is designed to absorb energy by collapsing vertically, with a minimum of backwards travel in the gear leg. This is in contrast to the Van's design that tends to tuck backwards on impact.

I believe that it is quite possible for Van's to build a similar system, and even make it retro-fittable to existing engine mounts. It would be heavier, of course, but the weight is ahead of the cg, which is beneficial.

I hope Van's is taking this issue seriously. I know with the RV-12 they are looking at a different system than they've used before. My hope is that they will put some energy into improving the existing design as well.

Vern Little
www.vx-aviation.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-23-2005, 11:38 PM
az_gila's Avatar
az_gila az_gila is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 57AZ - NW Tucson area
Posts: 10,011
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by vlittle
I had a good look at a Grumman Cheetah today, which also uses a castering nosewheel. The gear is larger diameter, a presumably stronger. The gross weight of a Cheetah is higher than most of the A models.

What was substantially different, however, is that the top of the nose gear strut was hinged at the firewall attach point, and two small oleo struts were attached several inches below that point to provide support and shock absorbtion.

On a hard impact the strut is designed to absorb energy by collapsing vertically, with a minimum of backwards travel in the gear leg. This is in contrast to the Van's design that tends to tuck backwards on impact.

Vern Little
www.vx-aviation.com
Vern... I own a Grumman Tiger (a Cheetah with a 180HP engine) and your statement is not quite correct.

The Grumman nose gear is designed to rotate about a torque tube that is just behind the firewall. It's not a hinge. The torque tube twist is the springing.

The two small shock struts were only added in 1977 and on models. I believe they are related to shimmy reduction, NOT the actual springing of the nose gear.

The Grumman nose gear leg is stiff, and all of it's movement comes from this torque tube...

A picture is at the bottom right of page 3 of this catalog section....
http://www.fletchair.com/onlineBrochure/32-39_Sec32.pdf

Many early Grummans had overshoot landings (don't come in hot...they float) and a typical failure was a snapping off of the nose gear leg.
I think the failure point is the bend in the nose gear leg. Each annual there is a check for ovality at the bend ....
Several did flip.... The baggage door has proved to be a way out .. if you are skinny...

gil in Tucson
Tiger N12GA coming out of the paint shop soon...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-24-2005, 05:57 PM
vlittle's Avatar
vlittle vlittle is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Victoria, Canada
Posts: 2,247
Default nose gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by az_gila
Vern... I own a Grumman Tiger (a Cheetah with a 180HP engine) and your statement is not quite correct.

The Grumman nose gear is designed to rotate about a torque tube that is just behind the firewall. It's not a hinge. The torque tube twist is the springing.

The two small shock struts were only added in 1977 and on models. I believe they are related to shimmy reduction, NOT the actual springing of the nose gear.

The Grumman nose gear leg is stiff, and all of it's movement comes from this torque tube...

A picture is at the bottom right of page 3 of this catalog section....
http://www.fletchair.com/onlineBrochure/32-39_Sec32.pdf

Many early Grummans had overshoot landings (don't come in hot...they float) and a typical failure was a snapping off of the nose gear leg.
I think the failure point is the bend in the nose gear leg. Each annual there is a check for ovality at the bend ....
Several did flip.... The baggage door has proved to be a way out .. if you are skinny...

gil in Tucson
Tiger N12GA coming out of the paint shop soon...

Gil, thanks for the clarification. For those interested, I took a picture of the Grumman set-up while I was helping with the wing spar AD. My AME said that the oleos are anti-porpoise dampers.

BTW, if any of your friends are doing the Spar AD, I have some tips. Contact me off-list.

Vern


Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:28 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.