VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Traditional Aircraft Engines
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-01-2008, 11:19 AM
Beancounter Beancounter is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 100
Default Engine thrust line

What is the better method of aligning the engine thrust line. Does one shim the dyna mounts or the firewall mounts.
__________________
C-GVMK
RV9a Slow(ly) built
Flying as of July 2012
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-01-2008, 11:36 AM
David-aviator David-aviator is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chesterfield, Missouri
Posts: 4,514
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beancounter View Post
What is the better method of aligning the engine thrust line. Does one shim the dyna mounts or the firewall mounts.
Not necessary to do either. The off set is designed into the engine and mount.

I just hung the Lycoming and noticed the mount bolts took 3 washers on the right side but just one on the left. The engine is off set to the right.
__________________
RV-12 Build Helper
RV-7A...Sold #70374
The RV-8...Sold #83261
I'm in, dues paid 2019 This place is worth it!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-01-2008, 12:02 PM
Beancounter Beancounter is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 100
Default

David I should have been more specific. My engine is pointed about a 4 degrees down on the vertical plane as compared to the longerons. I have read that for the plane to be most efficient they should be in the same vertical plane.
__________________
C-GVMK
RV9a Slow(ly) built
Flying as of July 2012
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-01-2008, 12:10 PM
L.Adamson's Avatar
L.Adamson L.Adamson is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: KSLC
Posts: 4,021
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beancounter View Post
David I should have been more specific. My engine is pointed about a 4 degrees down on the vertical plane as compared to the longerons. I have read that for the plane to be most efficient they should be in the same vertical plane.
I'd double check again, because my 6's engine has the downward offset, and so does the cowl to fit it. In fact, a whole lot of aircraft have the engines slanted downward, as well as many R/C models that I built. I'm sure that Van's engine mount is taking all this into account.

L.Adamson --- RV6A
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-01-2008, 12:45 PM
pierre smith's Avatar
pierre smith pierre smith is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Louisville, Ga
Posts: 7,840
Default It's self-aligning, Matt.......

.....as it comes from Van's. Don't shim it up or to the left. Just mount it. As has been said, it's supposed to have down and right thrust.

Regards,
__________________
Pierre Smith
RV-10, 510 TT
RV6A (Sojourner) 180 HP, Catto 3 Bl (502Hrs), gone...and already missed
Air Tractor AT 502B PT 6-15 Sold
Air Tractor 402 PT-6-20 Sold
EAA Flight Advisor/CFI/Tech Counselor
Louisville, Ga

It's never skill or craftsmanship that completes airplanes, it's the will to do so,
Patrick Kenny, EAA 275132


Dues gladly paid!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-01-2008, 12:58 PM
Beancounter Beancounter is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 100
Default

Thanks for the suggestions guys. Does anybody shim their engines back up when they sag. Just being cautious before I make the final cut on fitting my cowling.
__________________
C-GVMK
RV9a Slow(ly) built
Flying as of July 2012
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-01-2008, 01:59 PM
L.Adamson's Avatar
L.Adamson L.Adamson is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: KSLC
Posts: 4,021
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beancounter View Post
Thanks for the suggestions guys. Does anybody shim their engines back up when they sag. Just being cautious before I make the final cut on fitting my cowling.
I adjusted my cowl, so that the spinner is towards the top for any eventual engine sag. The engine has been on the mount for four years, but only 25 hrs. of use (which is in the last 1 1/2 month). So far, it hasn't sagged at all. But lower firewall mount -- washers can also be installed to make up for sag, if required later.

L.Adamson --- RV6A
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-01-2008, 03:44 PM
az_gila's Avatar
az_gila az_gila is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 57AZ - NW Tucson area
Posts: 10,011
Smile Yes....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beancounter View Post
Thanks for the suggestions guys. Does anybody shim their engines back up when they sag. Just being cautious before I make the final cut on fitting my cowling.
...and the correct washers to use are Lord part numbers J2218-6 (about 1/8 thick) and J2218-61 (about 1/16 thick). AN970's will also work, but their diameter is a little smaller.

However, build it now and worry about shimming later only if it sags....
__________________
Gil Alexander
EAA Technical Counselor, Airframe Mechanic
Half completed RV-10 QB purchased
RV-6A N61GX - finally flying
Grumman Tiger N12GA - flying
La Cholla Airpark (57AZ) Tucson AZ
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-01-2008, 03:51 PM
Steve Sampson Steve Sampson is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N. Yorkshire, England
Posts: 1,050
Default

I am pretty sure the thrust line is meant to be down, compared with the horizontal (canopy rails on the RV) on most aircraft.

The reason I understand, though I dont know where I got it from, is so that when you put power in it reduces the pitch up. In other words it stays close to trim over a wider power range that way.

Not 100% sure of that but close.
__________________
Steve

G-IKON Build log here , or Index to blog here.
RV4 #4478 - Flying since 16th June '08. First flight video here.
Circuits at my 1000' strip.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-01-2008, 04:17 PM
Andy_RR Andy_RR is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 426
Default down-thrust and right-thrust? why do we have it?

I can kind of half buy the pitch trim theory for downthrust, but why do we need right-thrust too? I don't believe torque reaction makes any engineering sense either.

I'm guessing it's because the stagnation point of front of the aircraft is actually below the propellor axis and both angles are there to correct for the unequal angles of attack of the propellor blades caused by the consequent assymetric flow.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:09 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.