VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-21-2008, 10:00 AM
FresnoR's Avatar
FresnoR FresnoR is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 479
Default RV's and today's economy

Well after months of researching just about every homebuilt kit available, I am about to take the plunge and order my RV-9A kit. I would like to thank everyone on this site for the knowledge you have all imparted to me.

My question stems from today?s economy. Do you think the downturn will cause an increase or possible decrease in the prices of RV kits? It seems to me the slowing demand of general aviation and luxury items such as homebuilt kits would ultimately result in lower prices, or maybe that?s just wishful thinking on my part since I'm about to buy one.

What do you think?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-21-2008, 10:32 AM
sprucemoose's Avatar
sprucemoose sprucemoose is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MKE
Posts: 1,519
Default

While demand may or may not decrease, the cost of raw materials is certainly going to continue to increase. Van's is known to operate on fairly slim margins to begin with. So I would not hold my breath waiting for the price to go down.
__________________
Jeff Point
RV-6, RLU-1 built & flying
Tech Counselor, Flight Advisor & President, EAA Chapter 18
Milwaukee
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-21-2008, 10:42 AM
FresnoR's Avatar
FresnoR FresnoR is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 479
Default raw material

Yeah, I figured prices would be dependant more on raw materials than anything else. Too bad their not made of wood, those raw prices have plummeted.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-21-2008, 10:45 AM
bsacks05's Avatar
bsacks05 bsacks05 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Warner Robins, GA
Posts: 1,187
Default

If I were buidling another plane - which I am. I would plan on installing a powerplant which will run on mogas. The cost and availability of 100LL is probably the greatest concern to piston powered aircraft owners. The prices of all the other stuff will remain the same or rise as with all other consumer goods.
__________________
Bruce Sacks
RV-9 N659DB - Flying since 7/1/06
Hatz CB-1 - Fabric covering with Polyfiber.
Warner Robins, GA
A&P
APRS KJ4EFS
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-21-2008, 10:52 AM
kentb's Avatar
kentb kentb is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Canby, Oregon
Posts: 1,786
Default Sense....

The average build time is in excess of 5 years the current economic condition may end up having very little to do with the cost to complete your plane.

Good luck.

Kent
__________________
Kent Byerley
RV9A N94KJ - IO320, CS, tipup
AFS 3500, TT AP, FLYING....
Canby, Or
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-21-2008, 10:53 AM
asav8tor asav8tor is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Seattle, wa
Posts: 679
Default

Since he has people that "buy" the materials and various items that go in the kits at volume, you could not duplicate the kit with raw materials at the prices he sells it for. It's as if you get all the fab for free. The margins have always been small.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-21-2008, 10:55 AM
the_other_dougreeves the_other_dougreeves is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas, TX (ADS)
Posts: 2,180
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bsacks05 View Post
If I were buidling another plane - which I am. I would plan on installing a powerplant which will run on mogas. The cost and availability of 100LL is probably the greatest concern to piston powered aircraft owners. The prices of all the other stuff will remain the same or rise as with all other consumer goods.
I would second this - Mogas isn't exactly the fuel of the future, but it certainly is one fuel of choice for today. Make sure you can use at least 91 pump octane mogas (87 is ideal, but not always achievable) and make everything compatible with at least E10.

TODR
__________________
Doug "The Other Doug Reeves" Reeves
CTSW N621CT - SOLD but not forgotten
Home Bases LBX, BZN
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-21-2008, 11:17 AM
frankh's Avatar
frankh frankh is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Corvallis Oregon
Posts: 3,547
Default Both are easy to do

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_other_dougreeves View Post
I would second this - Mogas isn't exactly the fuel of the future, but it certainly is one fuel of choice for today. Make sure you can use at least 91 pump octane mogas (87 is ideal, but not always achievable) and make everything compatible with at least E10.

TODR
With the bog standard lycoming clone with 8.5:1 pistons or less.

Frank
IO360 now featuring E10.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-21-2008, 11:19 AM
frankh's Avatar
frankh frankh is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Corvallis Oregon
Posts: 3,547
Default See post above

Quote:
Originally Posted by bsacks05 View Post
If I were buidling another plane - which I am. I would plan on installing a powerplant which will run on mogas. The cost and availability of 100LL is probably the greatest concern to piston powered aircraft owners. The prices of all the other stuff will remain the same or rise as with all other consumer goods.
With the right choice of componentry this is very easy to achieve with an IO360.

Frank
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-21-2008, 12:06 PM
airguy's Avatar
airguy airguy is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Garden City, Tx
Posts: 5,122
Default

You'll want to eliminate ALL RUBBER ANYTHING in the fuel system, from the filler cap to the engine manifold. Ethanol in mogas will do a number on the rubber, it's the main reason certified aircraft need an STC to convert. Alodine ALL the fuel-wetted aluminum parts in the entire fuel system (don't forget the pick-up tubes and vent lines). Injected engines seem less prone to vapor lock with mogas than carbs due to higher fuel pressures. There are other items to be done as well to make the engine happier, but some are controversial and you'll get opinions on both sides.

My opinion only - worth what you paid for it.
__________________
Greg Niehues - SEL, IFR, Repairman Cert.
Garden City, TX VAF 2020 dues paid
N16GN flying 700 hrs and counting; IO360, SDS, WWRV200, Dynon HDX, 430W
Built an off-plan RV9A with too much fuel and too much HP. Should drop dead any minute now.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:12 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.