VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #1  
Old 09-29-2005, 07:18 PM
RV6_flyer's Avatar
RV6_flyer RV6_flyer is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NC25
Posts: 3,503
Default Brake O-rings

Caliper O-Ring started to leak at 1,000 flying hours. Replaced one side and within 2 weeks, other side was leaking.

3 other RVs in the SoCAL Wing of Van's Air Force have had the same kind of problem around 5 years or 1,000 hours of operation. One RV-8 put the puck in BACKWARDS then did the recommend brake lining conditioning with a high speed taxi. Needless to say, the puck came out far enough that he got 5606 on the hot disc and had a fire. Ground Control radioed the aircraft. Back at the hangar, the pilot's son put the fire out with the hangar fire extinguisher. The fire was right below a full fuel tank. Wheel pants and brakes were replaced.

On my airplane, I plan to replace O-rings every 5 years or 1,000 flying hours. DO NOT do brake lining conditioning per the recommendation that comes with the lining. RVs are much lighter than the FACTORY airplanes that the brakes were designed for.

Gary
RV-6, flying for 8 years, 1,776 flying hours.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-29-2005, 07:34 PM
sprucemoose's Avatar
sprucemoose sprucemoose is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MKE
Posts: 1,519
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RV6_flyer
DO NOT do brake lining conditioning per the recommendation that comes with the lining.
Just curious, why you recommend against this proceedure, when it was the incorrectly installed brake puck which caused the fire?

FWIW cleveland did ship a number of brake assemblies with the puck installed backwards, several years ago. Vans had a service notice out to disassemble and inspect the brakes for this.
__________________
Jeff Point
RV-6, RLU-1 built & flying
Tech Counselor, Flight Advisor & President, EAA Chapter 18
Milwaukee
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-30-2005, 06:37 AM
RV6_flyer's Avatar
RV6_flyer RV6_flyer is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NC25
Posts: 3,503
Default Brake conditioning

One does not need to taxi at 20 mph for 3,000 feet to condition the brakes. This makes too much heat. Too much heat increases the risk of fire. It does not take much heat to catch 5606 on fire. Yes one needs to taxi with the brakes but not 3,000 feet at 20 mph. Just do one landing and BRAKE HARD to short stop. I find that the taxi from my hangar to the runup area (1,000 feet) is enough to hold the airplane for runup. (yes with the constant speed prop I can go full power and skid the tires but the short conditioning is enough to hold it at 1,700) Once around the patch and heavy breaking on the landing is all I need. My brakes last around 400 hours.

Be careful with the brake conditioning. Yes you want to generate some heat to conditonion the brakes but not so much heat that you risk a brake fluid fire from a leak.

http://members3.clubphoto.com/socal2...46/guest.phtml


Quote:
Originally Posted by sprucemoose
Just curious, why you recommend against this proceedure, when it was the incorrectly installed brake puck which caused the fire?

FWIW cleveland did ship a number of brake assemblies with the puck installed backwards, several years ago. Vans had a service notice out to disassemble and inspect the brakes for this.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:01 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.