VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-27-2008, 08:39 AM
prkaye prkaye is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,116
Default To stay current or not to stay current...

I've always been told "stay current while you're building". Now I'm questioning that, for myself.
I fly once a month now, just to stay current. It's 150 bucks a month and is becoming an unenjoyable nuisance. I have to book the plane, and then often when the weather is bad cancel and re-book (like today). I always have it on my mind "uh-oh, gotta go flying next week to stay current" (club requires 1 flight every 30 days). I don't make long interesting trips anymore, because I'm funnelling the money towards building (and it's over 120 bucks an hour to rent). Also, once my baby is born, its goign to be even harder to get out there every month to do that.

So, I'm considering this. Let it lapse while I finish building. Put that 120 per month in the bank. Then, when the RV is almost ready, go spend that money to get current again and do transition training.

Advice?
__________________
Phil
RV9A (SB)
Flying since July 2010!
Ottawa, Canada
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-27-2008, 09:14 AM
Jim Percy Jim Percy is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 179
Default

I didn't stay current during my build, in fact I hadn't flown in a couple of years when I started. If you're not enjoying the flying and are just going through the motions to maintain currency, you're probably better off letting it lapse. You'll save some money and I'd guess the skills will return easily enough when the time comes. Insurance will probably require some dual before you can fly your airplane anyway.

Good luck!
__________________
Jim Percy
SoCal
FFI Wingman
RV-7A, XP-O-360
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-27-2008, 10:07 AM
Ironflight's Avatar
Ironflight Ironflight is offline
VAF Moderator / Line Boy
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 12,247
Default

Truthfully, it is probably only a question you can answer for yourself Phil, but asking other's experience is a good way to sort it out. In my mind, it all depends on how important "flying" is to you. If you fly casually, and it is something that you do when you have the time, then there is nothing wrong with dropping it, and going full-bore when you are ready - as long as you are honest and truthful about the amount of time that you will need to spend getting REALLY ready.

Personally, I can't stand to NOT fly - it is a passion that is deep-seated in my bones. I kept my Grumman until the -8 had flown, and that meant paying hangar rent, maintenance, fuel, etc. For me, I'd have dropped many other things before I dropped the flying. It is purely my own speculation, but I think that a lot of airplane projects get abandoned when their builders drift far enough away from the passion of flying that they forget why they are building in the first place.

But as I said at the start - this all depends on your own motivations and drives - what it is that makes YOU tick.

(I know of one older fellow who was a military pilot and flight test engineer, then didn't fly anything for decades. When he retired, he built an immaculate kit biplane, but as a perfectionist, he acknowledged the need to do a tremendous amount of training before he felt he'd be ready to fly it. One thing lead to another, he got busy with post-retirement activities, and now, fifteen years later, he still hasn't flown the plane....and I am sure he never will.)
__________________
Paul F. Dye
Editor at Large - KITPLANES Magazine
RV-8 - N188PD - "Valkyrie"
RV-6 (By Marriage) - N164MS - "Mikey"
RV-3B - N13PL - "Tsamsiyu"
A&P, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor
Dayton Valley Airpark (A34)
http://Ironflight.com

Last edited by Ironflight : 09-27-2008 at 03:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-27-2008, 10:23 AM
prkaye prkaye is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,116
Default

Another, possibly deciding factor that I just realised is that (in Canada) we have to have 100 hours PIC to be allowed to test fly our ameteur builts. I need another 30 or so, so I guess I better keep flying.
__________________
Phil
RV9A (SB)
Flying since July 2010!
Ottawa, Canada
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-27-2008, 10:26 AM
ge9a ge9a is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 167
Default

I decided that I would diligently stay current during the building process. For me, there isn't a single time in the airplane that I don't learn something, whether about me and my skills, or about the airplane, or whatever - every flight is a different experience, even if it's just a few laps around the pattern. And "a good pilot is always learning." (I read that somewhere). My thinking is that I want to be the safest and most proficient pilot I can be when my plane is ready to fly. And in my situation, I don't feel the best way to to that is to get current right before I'm ready to fly the plane I just built. Yes, it's a pain to book rented planes, and sometimes I have to make the time to do it. But for me, it's worth it (90% of the time).

I have often thought of just buying a plane to have something to fly when I want to while I'm building, and there are many arguments for and against that. And I have seriously looked at several. But I have never pulled the trigger. It would now be time to sell the plane anyway for RV funds, so I don't even think about it any more. But I do still rent. I take my wife with me occasionally, and it forces me to 'go someplace' for lunch or breakfast, rather than just fly around the local area. I also fly with a friend whenever I can, who has a plane, and is building. I learn something there, too, and it's interesting to see how another pilot handles things.

Just one person's opinion ...........
__________________
Greg English
Beaverton, OR
RV-9A QB
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-27-2008, 10:31 AM
ge9a ge9a is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 167
Default

Oh, and I should probably mention that I'm a fairly low time pilot - only about 130 hrs PIC. And I was much lower when I started building, which was definately a motivating factor to stay current.
__________________
Greg English
Beaverton, OR
RV-9A QB
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-27-2008, 10:37 AM
boom3's Avatar
boom3 boom3 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sumner, WA
Posts: 722
Default

I'm with Paul on this one, I gotta fly or I start to go batty. With work, kids, and the RV project my plate is pretty full. Flying takes my mind off of everything.
__________________
Jeff Bloomquist
Sumner, WA
PP-ASEL, IR

RV-7A
Flying
1150 Hours
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-27-2008, 11:43 AM
jcaplins's Avatar
jcaplins jcaplins is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Davis, CA, USA
Posts: 539
Default

If you are only trying to stay curent for the PPL standards. Drop the club and let it lapse, save some money.

I stopped flying for 2 years and when I went to get a BFR, It took 1 hour ground and 1 hour flying. Altitude hold was a little sloppy, but I greased the landings and the instructor said. "what can I say, you know what you're doing. BFR done, your current"

It really takes very little effort to jump back in where you left off.

IFR currency is a differnt story. I'm still working on that.

I should also note, I was going crazy not flying for 2 years.
__________________
Jeff Caplins
California
RV7 N76CX
(started: Feb 2002 --> Completed: May 2016)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-27-2008, 10:15 PM
Captain Sacto Captain Sacto is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 146
Default currency...it's a good thing

While I understand if a builder wants to devote currency maintenance time toward building, I tend to think that staying current has advantages that can translate into building. It keeps you focused on your flying, and might help you narrow down what you will eventually need regarding avionics, AP, engine size, and other choices.
I also think that maintaining some level of currency keeps you in the aviation game and thus, focused on finishing.

Me, I'm a hopeless aviation romantic.
I've been flying for about 3 decades, and I'm still not jaded.
So, every few months, I'm off to the airport to maintain currency; and, I do so by trying to challenge myself w seldom-visited airports when I can.

One other thing.
When you finish your RV, you have a new airborne sportscar that requires attentive flying. If you maintain your flying skills, as opposed to letting them rust, I think you will be a better (and safer) RV flyer.
__________________
Tom in Sacramento.
RV-7A, Emp Kit finished (only 2 yrs!).
Wing construction officially started.
N7877A Reserved. Planning to call it "The STREAKER"
VAF # 1635
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-27-2008, 10:37 PM
hydroguy2's Avatar
hydroguy2 hydroguy2 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Townsend, Montana
Posts: 3,179
Default easy choice....

When the retirement property is a 4.5hr drive, but after 1.5 spamcan hours the downwind looks like this



and turning final looks like this



AND now the flying club just replaced it's wrecked Citabria with this



you have no choice but to stay current. YMMV
__________________
Retired Dam guy. Life is good.
Brian, N155BKsold but bought back.

Last edited by hydroguy2 : 09-27-2008 at 10:45 PM. Reason: picture juggle
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:30 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.