Quote:
Originally Posted by Stabird
It would be a great help to see if your analysis software could produce some insight on the cause. Let me know your thoughts.
Stabird.
|
I'm a Mechanical Engineer and have probably around 10,000 hours of experience modeling aerospace hardware in Pro Engineer. I've toyed with the idea of modeling up the "A" nose gear and running a structural analysis on it, but never could get motivated. I have thought about this a lot, and it would not be a trivial task.
The actual part modeling would be pretty straightforward. The hard part is coming up with the right set of boundary conditions, which accurately represent the forces acting on the nose gear during landing and proper modeling of the bearings. We model bearings as spring systems, but it takes a thorough understanding of the bearing (bearing friction, pre-load, race material, etc) to get the spring constant right. Without all that the analysis is useless.
I'm not saying this can't be done, it just would take a lot of work. Hence, my lack of motivation. In fact if someone could model the bearings and knew the bearing friction I could take a cut at the forces and run a simple model if provided with the drawings.