VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Traditional Aircraft Engines
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-24-2008, 07:56 AM
David-aviator David-aviator is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chesterfield, Missouri
Posts: 4,514
Default Thanks, but no thanks.....on kit engines

.....I prefer to have someone like Monty Barrett put my engine together and test it on a dyno before first flight.

Yes, everyone needs to save money but this is one area where there is no substitute for experience. I've considered doing it and finally decided it is not worth the money saved as I am convinced not everyone can do a decent job assembling an engine - especially me.

Just food for thought for guys sitting on the fence with regard to this subject.....the money saved on a basic panel vrs all the glass goodies available these days will go a long way toward a professionally built engine.
__________________
RV-12 Build Helper
RV-7A...Sold #70374
The RV-8...Sold #83261
I'm in, dues paid 2019 This place is worth it!

Last edited by David-aviator : 07-24-2008 at 02:59 PM. Reason: spelling
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-24-2008, 08:25 AM
frankh's Avatar
frankh frankh is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Corvallis Oregon
Posts: 3,547
Default I think thats perfectly rational

Bearing in mind you get a warranty on a completed engine but a parts engine will only give you the warranty on the parts.

I have built hundreds of engines over the years and at the time the cost to have a shop assemble it was $1500 or something....As I'd never wrenched on a Lycoming the choice was clear..I had plenty of other things to do..

Another (psychological) thought...The RV's are travelling machines..I have never flown so far over such inhospitible terrain on occasion..Now I did torque that nut on the..didn't I?..

Frank
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-24-2008, 02:51 PM
Bob Axsom Bob Axsom is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,685
Default Well there is another value

I have never worked on the inside of an engine used on an airplane. I definitely do not like being in this position of practical ignorance - general theory is only so good when you strive for improvement. I have worked on many projects and many technologies in the aerospace industry and I know that you can only fully appreciate the techniques and skills of the masters if you have suffered the learning and achieved some measure of success in the field yourself. That is what I miss. There are two areas that I have not touched in my personal attempts to make my airplane faster. One is the prop and the other is the engine. The thing that stops me is cost and not the reluctance to take on the challenge. If they had been available when I built my airplane I would have seriously considered that option.

Bob Axsom
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-24-2008, 04:16 PM
fliier fliier is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 101
Default Missing the best part?

For me, the engine was the one of the most enjoyable parts of the project. Seeing all those shiny new or rebuilt pieces before they came together really de-mystified the process.

John Allen
RV-6A
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-24-2008, 04:32 PM
DeltaRomeo DeltaRomeo is offline
unqualified unfluencer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Highland Village, TX
Posts: 4,086
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fliier View Post
For me, the engine was the one of the most enjoyable parts of the project. ...snip
Me too. I have 800 hours on my ECi kit engine to date. Danny King (who has rebuilt several a/c engines) walked me through each turn of the wrench. A very educational and satisfying experience. We did mic every part. What surprised me most was the small number of parts.

I'd do it again (with Danny watching over my shoulder).

b,
d
__________________
Doug Reeves (your host)
  • Full time: VansAirForce.net since '07 (started it in '96).
  • Part time: Supporting Crew Member CAE Embraer Phenom 300 (E55P) @ KDFW.
  • Occasionally: Contract pilot (resume).

Last edited by DeltaRomeo : 07-24-2008 at 06:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-24-2008, 04:38 PM
nucleus nucleus is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bozeman, Montana
Posts: 858
Talking Superior

I don't believe that you give up the warranty if you build it at the Superior build school.

Hans
__________________
Dr. Hans Conser
Bozeman Chiropractor
RV-6A 195 Hours, up for sale soon?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-24-2008, 04:43 PM
N131RV N131RV is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Elmendorf,TX
Posts: 358
Default It's not that complicated.

Quote:
Originally Posted by David-aviator View Post
.....I prefer to have someone like Monty Barrett put my engine together and test it on a dyno before first flight.

Yes, everyone needs to save money but this is one area where there is no substitute for experience. I've considered doing it and finally decided it is not worth the money saved as I am convinced not everyone can do a decent job assembling an engine - especially me.
Typical Lycoming aircraft engines are no more complicated than a lawnmower.

Would I fly behind an engine I assembled? Absolutely. With good manuals, quality parts and a couple of "experienced" friends to help with questions, no problem.

Caveat:

I know quite a bit about engines in general, my IO360-A1B6 in particular. I would seek advice and help on any question that I was not absolutely sure of.

YMMV
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------
Hangared since 11/23/2011, working on getting airborne again!
Joe Portman
N131RV - RV-7A, IO360A1B6, CS
Rebuilt as TD
Added dual MGL EFIS.
Airborne again at last! 2/21/2009

Elmendorf, TX (28TE)

baron (AT) baron (dot) com
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-24-2008, 05:03 PM
szicree szicree is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,061
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N131RV View Post
Typical Lycoming aircraft engines are no more complicated than a lawnmower.
Not trying to start anything and while I agree with the spirit of this oft repeated statement, having built both I respectfully disagree. Dual mags and their drives, non-integral cyls, pushrods and their tubes, rockers, etc., and just more of everything make it a significantly bigger job than building a mower motor.
__________________
Steve Zicree
Fullerton, Ca. w/beautiful 2.5 year old son
RV-4 99% built and sold
Rag and tube project well under way

paid =VAF= dues through June 2013
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-24-2008, 05:30 PM
Harland E. [n.m. u.s.a.] Harland E. [n.m. u.s.a.] is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Santa Fe n.m.
Posts: 105
Default I'm goin' for it

One of the most difficult projects I ever did was the rebuild on my '85 mr 2's 4-AG motor. Literaly HUNDREDS of parts ,not to mention the actual install,[talk about cramped] made it very demanding -but it still only took me a week.That engine was extremely complex but it has never failed me in the last 60000 miles and the satisfaction and pride and confidence it gave me made it all worth while.I took that experience to the Ford engine next and it was even easier.Basicly, if you can read and follow directions and dont mind getting dirty,if you can follow a RECIPE in a cook book,you can rebuild an engine and really come to understand and take all the mystery out of it.Lycomings appear to be fairly simple engines ,[but precise]and I'm personally looking forward to getting inside one and building it up!
__________________
Doin' time on planet Earth,at least 'til my ship is flying.
Harland Espeset Santa Fe,N.M.

V.A.F #650
RV-7a,wings
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-24-2008, 06:16 PM
rv6ejguy's Avatar
rv6ejguy rv6ejguy is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 5,745
Default

It is all fine if everything is machined and toleranced correctly. If it is not, the inexperienced person may just assemble it (seen this dozens of times) and think all is well. Often times the kabbooom is not far in the future when this is the case. Lots to know to assemble an engine and what to look for that does not come from a manual- only experience. You need a full set of mics and gauges to really do it right. I never trust the machine shop to machine things right.

If you have a pro looking over your shoulder as you do it- that is a great learning experience.
__________________

Ross Farnham, Calgary, Alberta
Turbo Subaru EJ22, SDS EFI, Marcotte M-300, IVO, Shorai- RV6A C-GVZX flying from CYBW since 2003- 441.0 hrs. on the Hobbs,
RV10 95% built- Sold 2016
http://www.sdsefi.com/aircraft.html
http://sdsefi.com/cpi2.htm


Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:10 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.