VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-19-2008, 01:13 AM
AMURRAY's Avatar
AMURRAY AMURRAY is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Posts: 204
Default Flowscan fuel flow unit. Should I be concerned?

The inlet hole into the Flowscan 201A-6 is .110 inches in diameter. That is smaller than 1/8 inch. A AN-6 fitting is .300 inches in diameter. It just seems a little choked down.
__________________
RV6 built and flying
Bearhawk Patrol plans purchased

Last edited by AMURRAY : 07-19-2008 at 10:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-19-2008, 04:09 AM
Kevin Horton's Avatar
Kevin Horton Kevin Horton is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,357
Default

My Airflow Performance boost pump pushed 45 US gallons/hr through my Floscan transducer when I did my fuel flow check. Hundreds (thousands?) of RVs are flying with that transducer without problem. Is there something about your aircraft or the way you will operate it that invalidates the good service experience from other RVs?
__________________
Kevin Horton
RV-8
Moses Lake, WA, USA
http://www.kilohotel.com/rv8/
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-19-2008, 07:02 AM
David-aviator David-aviator is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chesterfield, Missouri
Posts: 4,514
Default

If the device is installed between the electric pump and the mechanical pump, there will be a pressure drop across it when the electric pump is not operating. According to Flowscan specs, that drop will range from .6 psi at 15 gph to 1.4 psi at 40 gph.

This drop in pressure will place the system nearer a vapor lock at the exit port when the electric pump is off and the mechanical pump is sucking fuel through it.

The operating temperature range of Flowscan is -65/100C. That's 212F tops. With cylinder heads running as high as 400F and exhaust ports 1200F, it probably is a good idea not to mount Flowscan in the engine compartment.

I am planning an installation using the 2 electric pumps and Flowscan mounted on the cabin floor with the standard mechanical pump at the engine and running the electric pumps, alternately but continuously. The only thing I did not think of was you can not suck fuel through an electric pump which was pointed out by Dan Rivera at Airflow Performance. A bypass with a check valve will be needed to provide flow if both electric pumps fail. All this to defeat the possibility of a vapor lock.....

__________________
RV-12 Build Helper
RV-7A...Sold #70374
The RV-8...Sold #83261
I'm in, dues paid 2019 This place is worth it!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-19-2008, 11:29 AM
clarkefarm clarkefarm is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 64
Default Facet pumps and anti-siphoning valve

I think that Facet market a considerable number of different model fuel pumps and only some have the anti-siphoning valve which would result in a blocked fuel line in the event of pump failure.

I run 4 Facet pumps in series (long story) and usually only use one at a time during cruise to fill a header tank.

Rupert Clarke
RV-9A, NSI/MPS EJ25
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-19-2008, 02:06 PM
Sticky1's Avatar
Sticky1 Sticky1 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 323
Default Hummmmm

This has always been a bone of contention with me. There are several types of senders on the market. Some metal some plastic. All have very small ports except for a few with 1/2 ports. Even those are "necked" down passing the paddle. The only way to do this is a capaticance sensor.....no one makes one for planes. Other fluids yes, but not for planes. Anyway, Placing it before the spider has always been acceptable.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-19-2008, 02:09 PM
frankh's Avatar
frankh frankh is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Corvallis Oregon
Posts: 3,547
Default I would suggest

Quote:
Originally Posted by David-aviator View Post
If the device is installed between the electric pump and the mechanical pump, there will be a pressure drop across it when the electric pump is not operating. According to Flowscan specs, that drop will range from .6 psi at 15 gph to 1.4 psi at 40 gph.

This drop in pressure will place the system nearer a vapor lock at the exit port when the electric pump is off and the mechanical pump is sucking fuel through it.

The operating temperature range of Flowscan is -65/100C. That's 212F tops. With cylinder heads running as high as 400F and exhaust ports 1200F, it probably is a good idea not to mount Flowscan in the engine compartment.

I am planning an installation using the 2 electric pumps and Flowscan mounted on the cabin floor with the standard mechanical pump at the engine and running the electric pumps, alternately but continuously. The only thing I did not think of was you can not suck fuel through an electric pump which was pointed out by Dan Rivera at Airflow Performance. A bypass with a check valve will be needed to provide flow if both electric pumps fail. All this to defeat the possibility of a vapor lock.....

That two independantly wired electric pumps AND a mechanical pump is overkill.

Frank
7a IO360 2* electric pumps..No mechanical pump
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-20-2008, 09:00 AM
osxuser's Avatar
osxuser osxuser is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pasadena CA
Posts: 2,484
Default

All the certified STC installs I've seen puts them in the engine compartment, either after the mechanical pump (on carb'd engines) or on the flow divider line (FI). Usually these are wrapped in firesleeving to lower temps.

I think they work just fine, and the engine compartment is where they belong. YMMV.
__________________
Stephen Samuelian, CFII, A&P IA, CTO
RV4 wing in Jig @ KPOC
RV7 emp built
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-20-2008, 05:32 PM
Sticky1's Avatar
Sticky1 Sticky1 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 323
Default OUCH

Quote:
Originally Posted by frankh View Post
That two independantly wired electric pumps AND a mechanical pump is overkill.

Frank
7a IO360 2* electric pumps..No mechanical pump



Hummmm.......And what do we do on take off..? We turn on a pump. And what happens if that pump fails...?

Keep the 3 pumps
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-20-2008, 06:25 PM
frankh's Avatar
frankh frankh is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Corvallis Oregon
Posts: 3,547
Default Wellll...

We are running two pumps so who cares?..I certainly don't!

Now of course this asumes you have plumbed the system so that both pumps can be run independantly.

Frank....700hours on two airplanes without mechanical fuel pumps.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-21-2008, 04:42 AM
Tony Spicer Tony Spicer is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 514
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AMURRAY View Post
The inlet hole into the Flowscan 201A-6 is .110 inches in diameter. That is smaller than 1/8 inch. A AN-6 fitting is .300 inches in diameter. It just seems a little choked down.
Floscan specs here:

http://www.floscan.com/html/blue/aviation.php

My read is that not all the fuel goes thru the small hole.

Tony
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:36 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.