VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Traditional Aircraft Engines
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-17-2008, 08:17 PM
Finley Atherton Finley Atherton is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 749
Default Fluctuating Fuel Flows With G Forces

Ever since day one I have had fuel flow readings that vary considerably. I have tried various transducer locations including between the carb and the engine driven fuel pump, between the electric pump and the gascolator and between the fuel selector and the electric fuel pump (the current location). I have replaced the engine monitor and the transducer (under the free exchange offer by JPI on VM 1000C units) with no improvement.
Lately I have discovered that the fluctuations are greatest in turbulence and mainly occur with the small G force changes. Today I went flying in smooth air and the readings were reasonably steady at 5.6 g/h. A mildly aggressive but brief pull on the stick momentarily decreased the reading to 3.5 g/h and a similar push on the stick shot the reading up to 13.8 g/h. The same maneuvers with the boost pump on gave similar results; from about 7.7 g/h down to 3.9 g/h and up to 19.8 g/h
Is this normal? Do others experience these fluctuations? Any suggestions would be appreciated. About the only thing I can think of is perhaps the carb float may be partially filled with fuel and the G forces are causing it to rise and fall, however the readings are the opposite that I would expect with changing G force. The engine always runs perfectly through the fluctuations and has never shown any signs of flooding or leaking fuel from the FAB drain hole.

Fin
9A
0-320, VM 1000C (new version)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-17-2008, 08:46 PM
osxuser's Avatar
osxuser osxuser is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pasadena CA
Posts: 2,484
Default

Does it average out to the correct amount? I've seen that carb'd engines FF varies a great deal, but averages out fine. That's because fuel really flows pretty unevenly to the carb, but evenly out of it.
__________________
Stephen Samuelian, CFII, A&P IA, CTO
RV4 wing in Jig @ KPOC
RV7 emp built
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-17-2008, 08:53 PM
David-aviator David-aviator is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chesterfield, Missouri
Posts: 4,514
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by osxuser View Post
Does it average out to the correct amount? I've seen that carb'd engines FF varies a great deal, but averages out fine. That's because fuel really flows pretty unevenly to the carb, but evenly out of it.
I agree with the above statement. A "G" load departure from 1 will cause the carb float to over react and fuel will flow unevenly through the impeller. The total used should be accurate no matter.

A long time ago I had an auto version of fuel flow installed with a 0235 with float and it worked quite well, unless the light bulb in the impeller unit burned out.
__________________
RV-12 Build Helper
RV-7A...Sold #70374
The RV-8...Sold #83261
I'm in, dues paid 2019 This place is worth it!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-17-2008, 10:47 PM
Finley Atherton Finley Atherton is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 749
Default

Here is 4 minutes of data from a typical straight and level flight. You will see that the fuel flow varies between about 36 L/H (9.5 g/h) to about 13 L/H (3.4 g/h) for a constant MAP, RPM and mixture setting. This was in relatively smooth air, in any sort of turbulence the FF readout is all but useless. Looking at the graph you could say it sort of averages out around the flat line segments of about 22 L/H. Is this the sort of thing I should expect from a FF transducer on a carb?

Fin

http://i211.photobucket.com/albums/b...h/FuelFlow.jpg

Last edited by Finley Atherton : 11-10-2009 at 02:57 PM. Reason: Clarification
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-18-2008, 05:08 AM
mahlon_r mahlon_r is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,024
Default

It would seem to me that the sensitivity of the system you are using, is not dampening out the float level variations as the float opens and closes. In another words, as the float chamber fills and empties the flow into the carb varies slightly and you are seeing that on the fuel flow gauge. I think, the system used for a carb'd engine needs to be less sensitive or have a lesser average reporting rate then an FI engine because the flow to the crab isn't as steady as it would be on an FI engine.
Good Luck,
Mahlon
?The opinions and information provided in this and all of my posts are hopefully helpful to you. Please use the information provided responsibly and at your own risk."
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-18-2008, 06:47 AM
petehowell's Avatar
petehowell petehowell is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MN
Posts: 2,269
Default Sensitivity setting?

Hi Fin,

I wonder if the JPI guys can provide you with a sensitivity parameter to set for the FF. I have a Dynon EMS with a floscan FF sender and I don't see this variation(sender between pump and gascolator). I seem to recall in an old thread(or maybe on the dynon board) that they have a routine that damps out the temp spikes in FF. Not sure if JPI works the same way.

This might be no help, but thought I would mention it. I'm still jealous that your 9A is faster than mine......
__________________
Cheers,
Pete

Amateur Plane - RV-9A N789PH - 2350+ Hrs
Amateur Radio - KD0CVN
Doggies Delivered - 25+
St. Paul, MN
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-18-2008, 01:16 PM
osxuser's Avatar
osxuser osxuser is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pasadena CA
Posts: 2,484
Default

I know for the JPI Flowscan 450, they have different senders for carbed and FI engines. Maybe you have a FI sender on a Carb'd engine?
__________________
Stephen Samuelian, CFII, A&P IA, CTO
RV4 wing in Jig @ KPOC
RV7 emp built
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-18-2008, 03:49 PM
Finley Atherton Finley Atherton is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 749
Default

Thanks all for your comments. I'll contact JPI and see what they suggest.

Fin
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:10 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.