VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-11-2008, 11:55 AM
Webb's Avatar
Webb Webb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Jackson, MS
Posts: 1,262
Default After the repair

After what recently happened to Black Magic, I was wondering.......

Does the owner/builder declare the repair complete and sign off and away they go or is there some type of additional inspection by a DAR (or equivalent)?

BTW - Anybody heard the status of BM lately?
__________________
Webb Willmott
Jackson, MS
N32WW
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-11-2008, 12:10 PM
lightning's Avatar
lightning lightning is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: getting ready to move
Posts: 287
Default

posted on the 7th of july

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackRV7 View Post
I'm posting this knowing others have much more than I have in my panel

BUT..........I just added it up.........I now officially have MORE in my panel than what I bought my first house for in 1981...$25,000 at 18%, back in the Jimmy Carter days

That's just not right!!
__________________
Ian

RV-8 economically on hold... short term hold.
AME2, USN
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-11-2008, 12:23 PM
Webb's Avatar
Webb Webb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Jackson, MS
Posts: 1,262
Default Sticker shock.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lightning View Post
posted on the 7th of july
I saw the panel sticker shock going on!!!!!

Just was thinking about all the rebuilding going on. I still am curious what happens after you declare the repair complete.
__________________
Webb Willmott
Jackson, MS
N32WW
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-11-2008, 05:14 PM
N131RV N131RV is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Elmendorf,TX
Posts: 358
Default No additional inspection is needed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Webb View Post
After what recently happened to Black Magic, I was wondering.......

Does the owner/builder declare the repair complete and sign off and away they go or is there some type of additional inspection by a DAR (or equivalent)?

BTW - Anybody heard the status of BM lately?
Unless of course, you made a "major modification" to the aircraft while it was being repaired.
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------
Hangared since 11/23/2011, working on getting airborne again!
Joe Portman
N131RV - RV-7A, IO360A1B6, CS
Rebuilt as TD
Added dual MGL EFIS.
Airborne again at last! 2/21/2009

Elmendorf, TX (28TE)

baron (AT) baron (dot) com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-11-2008, 07:54 PM
BlackRV7's Avatar
BlackRV7 BlackRV7 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 704
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Webb View Post
After what recently happened to Black Magic, I was wondering.......

Does the owner/builder declare the repair complete and sign off and away they go or is there some type of additional inspection by a DAR (or equivalent)?
In my case, my operating limitations detailed the following: "After incorporating a major change as described in 21.93, the aircraft owner is required to reestablish compliance with 91.319b and notify the geographically responsible FSDO of the location of the proposed test area. The aircraft owner must obtain concurrence from the FSDO as to the suitability of the proposed test area." Pretty cut and dry. Since I have installed a new engine I must fill out a revised 8130-6 to update Black Magic's file in the FAA registry. I will have a five hour fly off back in Phase 1.......which I am looking forward to with that new Barrett Precision engine

As for the progress there is one key word in the above.............
__________________
Dana Overall
Richmond, KY i39
http://www.DanaOverallCPA.com
Repeat offender, RV-10 emp
Builder/former owner, RV-7, "Black Magic" Flying
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMi05-WU2D0#GU5U2spHI_4
VAF #993
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-11-2008, 08:08 PM
az_gila's Avatar
az_gila az_gila is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 57AZ - NW Tucson area
Posts: 10,011
Question Major changes

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackRV7 View Post
In my case, my operating limitations detailed the following: "After incorporating a major change as described in 21.93, the aircraft owner is required to reestablish compliance with 91.319b and notify the geographically responsible FSDO of the location of the proposed test area. The aircraft owner must obtain concurrence from the FSDO as to the suitability of the proposed test area." Pretty cut and dry. Since I have installed a new engine I must fill out a revised 8130-6 to update Black Magic's file in the FAA registry. I will have a five hour fly off back in Phase 1.......which I am looking forward to with that new Barrett Precision engine

As for the progress there is one key word in the above.............
Dana...is that correct if you installed the same model engine?

I believe that for a certified plane, an engine change (same model number) is not a major change and only needs a log book entry.

Why should an experimental be different? - given the same engine model....

gil A - in sunny NE
__________________
Gil Alexander
EAA Technical Counselor, Airframe Mechanic
Half completed RV-10 QB purchased
RV-6A N61GX - finally flying
Grumman Tiger N12GA - flying
La Cholla Airpark (57AZ) Tucson AZ
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-11-2008, 08:46 PM
BlackRV7's Avatar
BlackRV7 BlackRV7 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 704
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by az_gila View Post
Dana...is that correct if you installed the same model engine?

I believe that for a certified plane, an engine change (same model number) is not a major change and only needs a log book entry.

Why should an experimental be different? - given the same engine model....

gil A - in sunny NE
My bad on the engine comment it says different make and model of engine but I think my prop gets me.

Gil, while my new engine is assembled per service data as applicable to Type 0-360A1A as my previous engine was, my new prop is a HC-C2YR-1BFP/F7497. My previous prop was a HC-C2YR-1BF/F7666. As per my op limits, it says "If the major change includes installing a different make and model of engine or propeller.....file a revised...8130-6. I went from a standard blade 1BF/7666 to the new blended 1BFP/F7497. Still looks to me like a major change that requires FSDO notification, revised 8130-6 and 5 hour flyoff.

Thoughts??
__________________
Dana Overall
Richmond, KY i39
http://www.DanaOverallCPA.com
Repeat offender, RV-10 emp
Builder/former owner, RV-7, "Black Magic" Flying
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMi05-WU2D0#GU5U2spHI_4
VAF #993

Last edited by BlackRV7 : 07-12-2008 at 04:27 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-11-2008, 09:13 PM
osxuser's Avatar
osxuser osxuser is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pasadena CA
Posts: 2,484
Default

You are absolutely right Dana, the prop does require new Phase 1 testing, although I don't think it'll need 40 hours worth. If you just do a repair with the same parts, or an engine overhaul with the same dash number engine, you don't need a new flyoff, that is just normal maintenance.
__________________
Stephen Samuelian, CFII, A&P IA, CTO
RV4 wing in Jig @ KPOC
RV7 emp built
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-11-2008, 10:20 PM
flion's Avatar
flion flion is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Flagstaff, AZ
Posts: 2,647
Default

I thought structural repairs constituted a major change?
__________________
Patrick Kelley - Flagstaff, AZ
RV-6A N156PK - Flying too much to paint
RV-10 14MX(reserved) - Fuselage on gear
http://www.mykitlog.com/flion/
EAA Technical Counselor #5357
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-12-2008, 04:55 AM
BlackRV7's Avatar
BlackRV7 BlackRV7 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 704
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flion View Post
I thought structural repairs constituted a major change?
I encourage you to just do a google search on 21.93. It is actually very small and does leave some room for consideration but it also leaves room for retribution. Here is the first paragraph, paragraph b refers to noise changes, as there is really not much later in the section other than the reference to using a replacement engine:

? 21.93 Classification of changes in type design

(a) In addition to changes in type design specified in paragraph (b) of this section, changes in type design are classified as minor and major. A "minor change" is one that has no appreciable effect on the weight, balance, structural strength, reliability, operational characteristics, or other characteristics affecting the airworthiness of the product. All other changes are "major changes" (except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section).

You could actually read this to mean a lot of "changes" are major and necessitate 5 hours back in Phase 1............

Remember here all I am doing is revising my 8130-6 to change the engine manufacturers name and prop model in the FAA registry and contacting my local FSDO to get their concurrence in using my original Phase 1 test area and throwing her back into Phase 1 for 5 hours as per my original op limits.
__________________
Dana Overall
Richmond, KY i39
http://www.DanaOverallCPA.com
Repeat offender, RV-10 emp
Builder/former owner, RV-7, "Black Magic" Flying
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMi05-WU2D0#GU5U2spHI_4
VAF #993
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:36 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.