|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

07-09-2008, 09:11 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Huskerland, USA
Posts: 5,862
|
|
Slick Mag SB3-03 & SB2-08A
This may be old news to some, but it was news to me. (Thanks Bob C.  )
Looks like there is a service bulletin on Slick Mags that was revised 7/1/2008.
I don't know how to post an Adobe formatted document so if you have Slicks you should go to the web site and look it up.
Not even the almighty Slick is immune from problems. 
__________________
RV-7 : In the hangar
RV-10 : In the hangar
RV-12 : Built and sold
RV-44 : 4 place helicopter on order.
Last edited by Geico266 : 07-09-2008 at 09:35 AM.
|

07-09-2008, 02:28 PM
|
 |
been here awhile
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 4,300
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geico266
This may be old news to some, but it was news to me. (Thanks Bob C.  )
Looks like there is a service bulletin on Slick Mags that was revised 7/1/2008.
I don't know how to post an Adobe formatted document so if you have Slicks you should go to the web site and look it up.
Not even the almighty Slick is immune from problems. 
|
Direct links to the SB's are in Gary Sobek's message from last month:
http://www.vansairforce.com/communit...ighlight=slick
|

07-09-2008, 02:42 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Huskerland, USA
Posts: 5,862
|
|
Thanks Sam, I knew the VAF crew was on top of it. I must have been sleeping......or flying!
__________________
RV-7 : In the hangar
RV-10 : In the hangar
RV-12 : Built and sold
RV-44 : 4 place helicopter on order.
Last edited by Mike S : 07-09-2008 at 10:35 PM.
|

07-09-2008, 07:37 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pasadena CA
Posts: 2,484
|
|
Wow, the "almighty slick". Short memory, anyone remember how crappy the original slicks were?
__________________
Stephen Samuelian, CFII, A&P IA, CTO
RV4 wing in Jig @ KPOC
RV7 emp built
|

07-09-2008, 07:52 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Huskerland, USA
Posts: 5,862
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by osxuser
Wow, the "almighty slick". Short memory, anyone remember how crappy the original slicks were?
|
I was being sarcastic.
************************************
Has anyone found any problems? (Not being sarcastic.  )
__________________
RV-7 : In the hangar
RV-10 : In the hangar
RV-12 : Built and sold
RV-44 : 4 place helicopter on order.
|

07-10-2008, 05:27 AM
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Locust Grove, GA
Posts: 2,624
|
|
I happened to see a comment on the Matronics list that since "we are experimentals, these AD's/Service bulletins don't affect us." In sincerely hope we don't really have that attitude in the RV community. This has been a controversial subject over the years, but it really boils down to this: it would be really hard to defend that you were flying an airworthy airplane if known AD's and Service bulletins were not complied with in the time specified. In the end, the insurance companies and lawyers will fight it out, but I can't imagine living with the grief that could come if someone got hurt or killed in an airplane that I was flying because I decided not to comply with an AD/SB under this premise.
In our original applications for airworthiness, there is a box that we check that says we have looked at the most recent bi-weekly AD list on FAA.gov. As a DAR, I require that all AD's and manufacturer SB's are complied with at the time of licensing. It's really the only way the builder can make the entry certifying that the aircraft is in an airworthy condition.
Vic
__________________
 Vic Syracuse
Built RV-4, RV-6, 2-RV-10's, RV-7A, RV-8, Prescott Pusher, Kitfox Model II, Kitfox Speedster, Kitfox 7 Super Sport, Just Superstol, DAR, A&P/IA, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor, CFII-ASMEL/ASES
Kitplanes "Unairworthy" monthly feature
EAA Sport Aviation "Checkpoints" column
EAA Homebuilt Council Chair/member EAA BOD
Author "Pre-Buy Guide for Amateur-Built Aircraft"
www.Baselegaviation.com
|

07-10-2008, 05:51 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Huskerland, USA
Posts: 5,862
|
|
Vic,
While I agree with the premise of your post, it seems to me some SB's / AD's are overkill. I would like to hear from anyone that has complied with the inspection portion of this SB and found a problem, or the beginning of a problem. Specifically, if the problem is being found on several mags I'd just replace the whole mag and skip the 10-15-25 hour inspection. Seems to be a lot less hastle for the $$$.
__________________
RV-7 : In the hangar
RV-10 : In the hangar
RV-12 : Built and sold
RV-44 : 4 place helicopter on order.
Last edited by Geico266 : 07-10-2008 at 05:53 AM.
|

07-10-2008, 06:10 AM
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Locust Grove, GA
Posts: 2,624
|
|
Larry, I agree with you that some might seem like overkill to you or I. Unfortunately, you and I don't get to make that decision. We live in a very litiguous society, and some may be CYA by the manufacturers for that very reason. Non compliance would put you in a very indefensible position if something were to happen directly attributable to the affected part.
I think you are the one with the "be careful out there" signature. This probably falls clearly into that bucket.
Vic
__________________
 Vic Syracuse
Built RV-4, RV-6, 2-RV-10's, RV-7A, RV-8, Prescott Pusher, Kitfox Model II, Kitfox Speedster, Kitfox 7 Super Sport, Just Superstol, DAR, A&P/IA, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor, CFII-ASMEL/ASES
Kitplanes "Unairworthy" monthly feature
EAA Sport Aviation "Checkpoints" column
EAA Homebuilt Council Chair/member EAA BOD
Author "Pre-Buy Guide for Amateur-Built Aircraft"
www.Baselegaviation.com
|

07-10-2008, 06:12 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,024
|
|
I have seen the brushes worn as depicted in the bulletin. The new replacement brush or mag has the same inspection requirement. So replacing the mag or brush doesn't get away from doing the repetitive portion of the bulletin.
Good Luck,
Mahlon
"The opinions and information provided in this and all of my posts are hopefully helpful to you. Please use the information provided responsibly and at your own risk."
|

07-10-2008, 07:41 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 116
|
|
I have not even started my new Aerosport 360 yet !
Anyways, called Aerosprt and they said that there are NO parts available at this time from Slick, so if you have abnormal wear, all we can do is send ya another "defective" mag until Slick gets this fixed.
Not there product or doing, but there customer service and awnsers to questions was excellent.
__________________
Ken Tattersall
Kens RV8
RV8, Pitts S1C,J5 Hybrid,AcroSport II
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:57 AM.
|