VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-03-2008, 12:44 AM
sglynn's Avatar
sglynn sglynn is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 823
Default Rudder Ripples and Skin not tight to wedge

Any suggestions on what to do about this rudder issue are appreciated. Rudder build was going great. I used fuel tank sealer to glue trailing edge and angle aluminum to hold it straight. I waited two days and riveted it per the plan. It is straight, BUT it has ripples on the shop head side, and the skins are not tight up against the wedge because the black stuff (fuel tank sealer) is in there. ANd I really scraped off the access and tried to use only a little. From arms length everything looks okay, but on closer look there are wavy humps on the rivets and the skins pull away from the wedge in some places. My options seem to be: 1) buy and build a whole new rudder 2) pour solvent on it and wire brush it and smash it more with the flush rivet set or 3) drill out some spots, clean out the black stuff and re-rivet 4) drill out the whole skin and re do and/or with a new skin or 5) get over it, live with it, and use lots of paint.

Your opinions are appreciated. thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-03-2008, 02:33 AM
kiwipete kiwipete is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Birmingham United Kingdom
Posts: 374
Default Photo's

Hi

A photo of the trailing edge would help to see to what extent the ripples are and how much gap you have would be helpful.
I've just finished a replacement rudder and both this and the first I built didn't pull that tight on the wedge. The problem I found is that the wedge isn't that thick and when it's countersunk from both sides you can't go too deep as you will open the holes up too much.
So it's a catch 22, with only just enough countersink and then the added thickness of the sealant, it does'nt sit as flush as I would have liked. But if I countersunk any more the wedge would have 1/8 holes. With the sealant and a little filler the edge looked fine and with the rivets well squeezed it's plenty strong enough. (The first one held up ok after being hit by an excavator!!)

Peter
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-04-2008, 09:23 PM
sglynn's Avatar
sglynn sglynn is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 823
Default URL to photo

Here is the photo.



Thanks for your reply and interesting story. Since posting, Van's told me to "live with it."

Last edited by n5lp : 07-05-2008 at 05:36 PM. Reason: To show photo
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-05-2008, 02:15 AM
kiwipete kiwipete is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Birmingham United Kingdom
Posts: 374
Smile

Steve

It looks no worse that most I've seen! As for the ripples it maybe that you've put a bit of pressure on the skins above the wedge and this has rippled it a little.
The rivets look like they are well formed and given that you've glued it with tank sealant it should be fine.

Keep building

Peter
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-05-2008, 09:03 AM
MikeJ 7A's Avatar
MikeJ 7A MikeJ 7A is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Deadwood, SD
Posts: 89
Default

Hi Steve,

I'm doing the rudder now also (after a year of no progress because of proseal fear and other things keeping me "too busy"). I'm finally back to work and about to do the trailing edge. Thanks for you timely post, I may have to reconsider proseal (vs epoxy vs nothing at all...).

I saw your photo (see below) and it looks like your counterweight skin is primered and riveted under the rudder skin? Is that correct? I might have screwed mine up but I overlapped my counterweight skin on top of the rudder skin.


Does it matter? Is it ok to have the counter weight skin overtop the rudder skin? Anyone?

Best!
MikeJ
__________________
RV-7A, VAF# 837, Working on the Wings
"Measure Twice, Cut Once"
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-05-2008, 10:59 AM
mcencula mcencula is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Delaware, OH
Posts: 435
Default Over / under and skin bulges

Mike,

I believe the counterweight skin is supposed to go under the main rudder skin. Aesthetics are the only thing that may be impacted and that only slightly. From a strength standpoint, they should be equal.

Steve,

Regarding skin bulges, my rudder has a slight bulge at every rivet. I didn't notice this until after it was all together, but I'm pretty sure it's caused by the dimples from the skin on one side hitting the dimples from the skin on the other side. The wedge is basically not thick enough for both dimples to sit down in the countersinks.

I told another builder about this and he decided to file down his dimples a little so they wouldn't touch. His rudder came out perfect.

Based on the photos, I'd say your rudder is probably above average. Any little dings can be filled with some microballoons and epoxy or other filler prior to painting and no one will ever be the wiser.
__________________
Mike Cencula
RV-7A (fuselage)
www.our7a.com
Betcha my pile-o-scrap is bigger than your pile-o-scrap.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-05-2008, 11:18 AM
Tom Martin Tom Martin is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,544
Default

A lot of imperfections can be cured with the use of a small hammer! You will need a solid flat surface that you can rest the trailing edge of the rudder on. I have a piece of steel angle bolted to the edge of my bench. The top surface is polished. With the trailing edge resting on this angle you can gently tap the areas that are high so that they come into line. The object is to slightly bend then the trailing edge of the skin. If you hit it too hard you will stretch the metal and make it worse. I have used this method on a number of trailing edges to take them to a higher level of finish.
__________________
Tom Martin RV1 pilot 4.6hours!
CPL & IFR rated
EVO F1 Rocket 1000 hours,
2010 SARL Rocket 100 race, average speed of 238.6 knots/274.6mph
RV4, RV7, RV10, two HRIIs and five F1 Rockets
RV14 Tail dragger

Fairlea Field
St.Thomas, Ontario Canada, CYQS
fairleafield@gmail.com
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-05-2008, 12:48 PM
MikeJ 7A's Avatar
MikeJ 7A MikeJ 7A is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Deadwood, SD
Posts: 89
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mcencula View Post
I believe the counterweight skin is supposed to go under the main rudder skin. Aesthetics are the only thing that may be impacted and that only slightly. From a strength standpoint, they should be equal.
So the "step up" on the rudder skin where it transitions from contacting the spar to resting on top of the counterweight skin doesn't bother anyone? Seemed like an odd thing to do...

Mike
__________________
RV-7A, VAF# 837, Working on the Wings
"Measure Twice, Cut Once"
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-05-2008, 05:19 PM
morlino's Avatar
morlino morlino is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Inman, SC
Posts: 158
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeJ 7A View Post
So the "step up" on the rudder skin where it transitions from contacting the spar to resting on top of the counterweight skin doesn't bother anyone? Seemed like an odd thing to do...

Mike
Mike,

Check out this thread : http://www.vansairforce.com/communit...ad.php?t=23039

I'm not sure why the instructions are so vague about this. But, get used to it. Unfortunately, the instructions become more and more worthless as you get further into the airplane. If you look on drawing 7, the R-913 counterbalance skin is dashed on the left side view indicating that it is underneath the R-901-L skin.

I feathered the edge of the counterbalance skin to ease the transition. I just used a vixen file to taper about 1" of the R-913 skin so there is a more gentle step. What I did is similar to the "scarf joint" for overlapping wing skins described on Dan C's website - http://www.rvproject.com/20020626.html - scroll down to the bottom of the page.

As is suggested in the other thread, your airplane should still fly. I don't see how it could make a big difference. If anything the way you built it will have less drag.
__________________
mark
RV7 - working on wings (very, very slowly)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-05-2008, 06:12 PM
Jeff R's Avatar
Jeff R Jeff R is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Merritt Island, FL
Posts: 602
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeJ 7A View Post
Thanks for you timely post, I may have to reconsider proseal (vs epoxy vs nothing at all...).
I tried T-88 epoxy and it didn't work all that well for me, so I went back to proseal. I think one key is to make sure the layer of proseal you smear on is thin and consistant.
__________________
Jeff Rosson
Repeat Offender
RV14 - Working on Empennage/Tail Cone
RV9A - Completed! First flight on July 18, 2012!
Based at Merritt Island, FL (KCOI)
VAF Number: 1170


----
Star Trek Quote: "Logically, it could work. Also, logically, there are a hundred variables, any one of which could put us in a worse position than we're in now." Mr. Spock in Return to Tomorrow
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:36 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.