VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-26-2008, 01:46 PM
SteelMike's Avatar
SteelMike SteelMike is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere, USA
Posts: 243
Default capacitative vs. float

So, I really didn't want to have to post this question (and yes, I did search), but I'm about to put a deposit down on some wings, and I don't know the difference between capacitive fuel sending units vs. float fuel sending units. Can someone give me the short-answer as to what to order here?

Thanks...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-26-2008, 01:55 PM
Brantel's Avatar
Brantel Brantel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Newport, TN
Posts: 7,496
Default

There is no short answer on what to order... Depends on what you want or like best.

Capacititive = No moving parts, must concider special indicator or capacitive converters. Two aluminum plates inside tank insulated from the tank. Some have problems with fuel leaking out of the standard elcheapo BNC connector others do not. Must be recalibrated for different types of fuels. When properly calibrated can read more accurate full to empty. If something goes wrong in the tank as far as insulators or the lead wire, you would have to bust open the tank to work on it.

Resistive is the tried and true standard that has been around for many moons. As far as reliablility goes, how many spam cans have you rented where the fuel guage actually worked correctly? Cannot read the top portion of the tank. It is a slide wire resistor with a wire arm bent into the correct configuration and a float attached to the end of the arm. The entire sensor can be inserted and removed thru the mounting hole which makes future replacement possible without tearing up the tank.

Never trust your life to a fuel guage in either case!
__________________
Brantel (Brian Chesteen),
Check out my RV-10 builder's BLOG
RV-10, #41942, N?????, Project Sold
---------------------------------------------------------------------
RV-7/TU, #72823, N159SB
Lyc. O-360 carbed, HARTZELL BA CS Prop, Dual P-MAGs, Dual Garmin G3X Touch
Track N159SB (KK4LIF)
Like EAA Chapter 1494 on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-26-2008, 02:00 PM
kentb's Avatar
kentb kentb is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Canby, Oregon
Posts: 1,786
Default Hello Mike

I bought the cap. type, but I don't think that I would bother to do it again.
The cap. is straight forward to install, but you will need to buy a converter to get the gauge/engine monitor to understand the measurement. IIRC I spent about $160.00 on the two converters.

The accuracy of the cap. sensor is better, but still not enough to judge amount left in the tank. I use my fuel flow and time to figure how much I have left. This is accurate to within 5%.

Kent
__________________
Kent Byerley
RV9A N94KJ - IO320, CS, tipup
AFS 3500, TT AP, FLYING....
Canby, Or
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-26-2008, 02:11 PM
SteelMike's Avatar
SteelMike SteelMike is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere, USA
Posts: 243
Default

Okay, that's what I thought. I understand that you can still use the float-type if you get glass panel EFIS/EM. Plus, you're going to have a very accurate fuel flow reading in either case, which is probably more important anyway. I think I'll just KISS and get the float-type.
thanks,
m
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-26-2008, 02:26 PM
Jim P's Avatar
Jim P Jim P is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 934
Default

Went the same way. Floats work with the GRT EIS/ EFIS, no problem. They are not the most accurate but give a good WAG. Fuel flow seems to be very accurate, but that's only my impression after about a dozen hours.

Jim
__________________
Jim Piavis
RV-7 (Flying!)
http://adap.com/rv7
Redmond, WA
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-26-2008, 06:32 PM
N941WR's Avatar
N941WR N941WR is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
Default

I went with the capacitative units in my -9.

The converters from Dynon are $50.

160 hours later and no leaks around the BNC connector and no other problems. The things just work, simple as that.

Oh, and check with Dynon, I think their converters work with non-Dynon products.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-26-2008, 07:04 PM
Ken Ken is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 129
Default

I went with both. The cap to my GRT and the float to a pair of Van's gages. Also have a watch. Shame on me if I .....

Ken
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:22 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.