|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

04-08-2008, 08:40 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Roma, Italy
Posts: 510
|
|
RAMI AV-12 or AV-532 VOR/GS antennas differences
Hi. I can't understand differences between the above mentioned antennas.
It seems AV-12 is low profile and AV-532 not.
Both are VOR receivers.
Van's describes the first as VOR and the second as VOR/GS.
RAMI website makes no difference.
My question is: is AV-12 capable of GS receiving or do I have to buy AV-534?
Thank-you.
Camillo
__________________
RV4 IO-320, Catto 3-blade, Christen, I-BILT
Flight time: 1 hour
Status: test flights
www.rv4.it
ROME, Italy
---
RV9A O-320 D1A, Hartzell C/S prop, slider, I-PRCA
Flight time: 350 hours
Status: SOLD
http://nuke.rv9.it
|

04-08-2008, 08:52 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Newport, TN
Posts: 7,496
|
|
I also have this question on nav antennas.
Some are listed as VOR/LOC and some as VOR/LOC/GS but they look the same to me. So what is the difference other than the price?
|

04-08-2008, 09:01 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,861
|
|
Wow, I sent those same questions in an e-mail to RA Miller sales this past Friday, but have yet to get a response. If I do, I'll post for all to see unless someone beats me to it.
I would think that both attennas would receive VOR and GS, but just not sure based on the physical description on the RAMI site which is the best solution for my installation.
I really like their prices compared to COMANT.
__________________
Todd "I drink and know things" Stovall
PP ASEL-IA
RV-10 N728TT - Flying!
WAR EAGLE!
|

04-09-2008, 06:47 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Roma, Italy
Posts: 510
|
|
Not to talk about the different drag:
- AV-12 is less than 1 lb. @350 mph;
- the other is more than 3 lbs...
Added: maybe the AV-12 is low drag antenna without GS capability. Actually, base is not as big as the one in AV-532. So, if one buys the first, he should add AV-570 splitter: http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/avpages/AV570.php This should be better for drag, but worst for connections (more connections). AV-532 should have GS capability incorporated, but it has a bigger base and arms which make more difficult installation inside tip and increase drag.
Is this right? If so, which combination is preferrable?
__________________
RV4 IO-320, Catto 3-blade, Christen, I-BILT
Flight time: 1 hour
Status: test flights
www.rv4.it
ROME, Italy
---
RV9A O-320 D1A, Hartzell C/S prop, slider, I-PRCA
Flight time: 350 hours
Status: SOLD
http://nuke.rv9.it
Last edited by Camillo : 04-09-2008 at 07:44 AM.
|

04-09-2008, 11:25 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,861
|
|
Just got off the phone with RAMI and here's the scoop:
- Electrical performance of both anttennas is the same (ie VOR/LOC/GS)
- The AV-12 is sold to Piper as OEM, the AV-523 to Aviat for the Husky
line
- The insulator on the -532 is twice as thick (7/8" vs 7/16" for the -12) and the stainless steel dipoles are a thicker guage on the -532 as well.
- Both require a cable with an integral Balun which comes with both antennas if you get the "L" version
- The AV-532 has a 2-hole bolt attachment pattern molded in. The AV-12 has a rectangular area that is marked "Do Not Drill" so you can use any bolt pattern you desire as long as you stay out of the rectangle.
It looks like the main difference is physical. So which one you go with depends mainly on whether you need a more robust antenna for your aircraft's environment (i.e. bush flying vs. long paved runways) or if you want/need more flexibilty on how you mount it. A diplexer for either antenna will be needed depending upon your avionics. For example, an SL30 has an integral diplexer so something like the 570 is not required. However, a GNS430 requires two NAV inputs (one for VOR and one for GS) so a external diplexer is required.
As I'm planning to mount mine on the bottom of my tailcone under the HS of my -10, I have decided to go with the AV-532 which is the same price as the AV-12 in Van's Online WebStore ($137).
__________________
Todd "I drink and know things" Stovall
PP ASEL-IA
RV-10 N728TT - Flying!
WAR EAGLE!
|

04-10-2008, 02:12 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Roma, Italy
Posts: 510
|
|
Excellent answer, Auburntsts!
Do you think that placing the antenna in the VS tip would require the more robust antenna, according to major vibrations in that zone? And if I would place antenna as you, under the tail cone?
Thanks.
Camillo
__________________
RV4 IO-320, Catto 3-blade, Christen, I-BILT
Flight time: 1 hour
Status: test flights
www.rv4.it
ROME, Italy
---
RV9A O-320 D1A, Hartzell C/S prop, slider, I-PRCA
Flight time: 350 hours
Status: SOLD
http://nuke.rv9.it
|

04-10-2008, 04:39 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,861
|
|
Camillo,
I think that either antenna in either location would be fine. RAMI's preference was VS first, then tailcone. I'm going with the tailcone simply because I've already completed my VS and the tailcone install will be easier IMO. So, my advice is to go with whichever one you find that's cheaper.
Ciao!
__________________
Todd "I drink and know things" Stovall
PP ASEL-IA
RV-10 N728TT - Flying!
WAR EAGLE!
|

04-12-2008, 01:51 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Roma, Italy
Posts: 510
|
|
Ok. Thank-you. I left VS rear spar open for antenna installation.
Ciao
__________________
RV4 IO-320, Catto 3-blade, Christen, I-BILT
Flight time: 1 hour
Status: test flights
www.rv4.it
ROME, Italy
---
RV9A O-320 D1A, Hartzell C/S prop, slider, I-PRCA
Flight time: 350 hours
Status: SOLD
http://nuke.rv9.it
|

04-12-2008, 06:44 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sheridan, IN
Posts: 94
|
|
I put my nav antenna in the wingtip and it works great and doesn't hang out. I have tested the range for LOC/VOR/GS in all headings and it works fine with just a single element antenna in the left wing.
__________________
Drew Cook - K9QV
Sheridan, IN
RV-7 N673AC
Superior IO-360 Horizontal Induction
Hartzell C/S Blended Airfoil
IFR Steam gauges
TruTrak Digiflight IIVS
500 Hours on airframe
|

04-17-2008, 12:33 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Roma, Italy
Posts: 510
|
|
Update: I found that wider antennas pins have better performance (less attenuation). I'm also thinking on going with one COM antenna under the belly (stright whip) and one over the turtle deck (straight whip). One cat whiskier in the VS (the wider one) and the other VOR antenna inside the wing tip (Bob archer).
__________________
RV4 IO-320, Catto 3-blade, Christen, I-BILT
Flight time: 1 hour
Status: test flights
www.rv4.it
ROME, Italy
---
RV9A O-320 D1A, Hartzell C/S prop, slider, I-PRCA
Flight time: 350 hours
Status: SOLD
http://nuke.rv9.it
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:21 AM.
|