VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Propellers
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 02-14-2008, 08:50 PM
designerX designerX is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 147
Default What's the typical going rate for a teardown and inspection...

What's the general going range in $$$ for a teardown and inspection...
... considering they find no internal damage? I'm planning on going the taildragger route and probably will start off with a wooden prop or the 3 blade composite.

Stan
__________________
Stan Smith
RV-8 slow build fuselage w/showplanes fastback
RV-4 (bought flying)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-14-2008, 10:34 PM
rwtalbot rwtalbot is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 251
Default It Depends...

If I was flying behind it, a complete teardown and inspection is what I would require and that is supported by engine manufacturers. Someone who wants to move the engine will often come up with many reasons why it is not required.

I once went to buy an engine from someone who sells a lot of second hand engines to homebuilders. I was pretty keen and the aircraft was described to me as "wind damaged". The logs looked good and the engine had 200 SMOH.

On a whim I punched in the N number of the aircraft it had been removed from, just before I rang the seller to buy. I found the pictures of the aircraft and NTSB accident report. It had been "flown" through a barb-wire fence in a runway overshoot. Both props looked very mangled in the picture.

Of course I offered the seller core value on condition the crank passed inspection. He declined and offered to remove the accessory case and replace one of the gears as per AD. I have never heard back from him, but I am confident there is an Experimental aircraft out there flying with that engine, probably completely unaware of its history.

I now own a Mattituck engine (new) after this and a number of other experiences. Bottom line is that there are very few good deals out there. If you are not absolutely sure of the history of the engine and/or pricing a bulk strip into the deal to find out exactly what you got, walk away. You and your passengers depend on the engine for your survival. Save some money on the avionics and paint if you need to.

Of course I am somewhat conservative, many others are not. Each person needs to make up their mind what sort of risks they are prepared to take.

Richard
RV7A - Finishing
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-15-2008, 02:07 AM
asav8tor asav8tor is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Seattle, wa
Posts: 679
Default

I'm not going to advocate NOT tearing it down but perhaps some consideration should be give to what type prop and what did it hit.

Could be different response to a wood prop hitting a mole hill getting mud on it vs a metal prop hitting concrete causing engine stoppage.

I saw a turboprop get two engine changes after it was taxied through a snow berm that was only 10 inches tall. Props only had six inches or so of ground clearance.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-15-2008, 03:16 PM
Brian Vickers Brian Vickers is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bainbridge Island, WA
Posts: 333
Default Prop Strike

Since you are considering an experimental, you can reason your own definition of "responsibility" as it relates to "prop strike" and "risk tolerance." The government trusts you to make the decision.

Van's website "cost estimator" lists "mid-time used engine" as one of the possible cost line items. I embarked on a quest to find one. After a while, I got worn down spending time on it. They are hard to find. Finally, I started to consider Ebay offerings. A dandy looking (rattle can repainted) mid-time, light prop strike unit came up for auction. The engine had not been torn down in any way. The seller?s description had phrasing like; bolt on and go, die tested, flange +- .002. I consulted my spam-can mechanic and he suggested requesting a photo of the prop. Great idea!! The photo shows the seller's definition of "light prop strike." Do you agree Claude? What do you experts think? The seller could just as easily been a flying RV owner; now for sale. The engine sold for $7,2XX.


__________________
Brian Vickers
Bainbridge Island, WA
RV4
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-15-2008, 03:58 PM
Mel's Avatar
Mel Mel is online now
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,762
Default Not Me!

No way I would fly that engine without a tear-down inspection. I've seen too many crankshaft gears come loose after minor prop strikes. And that one doesn't look minor to me.
Another thing to consider. Who's to say the seller didn't "tweak" the prop before taking the pictures?
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-16-2008, 06:04 AM
pierre smith's Avatar
pierre smith pierre smith is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Louisville, Ga
Posts: 7,840
Default Listen, guys...

....to Mel and the other Tech advisers!

I'll repeat this post for the newbies on here. Several years ago, a Piper lost the engine at night after departing Augusta, Ga and climbing to 5000 or so, and was vectored to Wrens, Ga airport, 15 miles north of my home base.

They came up less than 1/4 mile short and the result was a fireball and five fatalities. Yep, the engine was a H2AD, single drive double mag and the shaft had broken. Further investigation revealed a prop strike to a dirt berm over a year ago, with no major damage and no teardown.

I saw the wreckage while it was still smoldering...ugly sight indeed.

You guys feelin' lucky?
__________________
Pierre Smith
RV-10, 510 TT
RV6A (Sojourner) 180 HP, Catto 3 Bl (502Hrs), gone...and already missed
Air Tractor AT 502B PT 6-15 Sold
Air Tractor 402 PT-6-20 Sold
EAA Flight Advisor/CFI/Tech Counselor
Louisville, Ga

It's never skill or craftsmanship that completes airplanes, it's the will to do so,
Patrick Kenny, EAA 275132


Dues gladly paid!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-16-2008, 06:48 AM
L'Avion's Avatar
L'Avion L'Avion is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Memphis
Posts: 159
Default $$$$$$$$ for prop strike inspection & compliance with AD

I spoke yesterday with an owner who had had a dirt-prop strike recently.

Cost to crate/freight/inspect/comply with AD (no damage) & return, from Memphis to Custom Airmotive in Tulsa - $3000.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-16-2008, 12:55 PM
Neal@F14's Avatar
Neal@F14 Neal@F14 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wichita Falls, TX
Posts: 2,182
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pierre smith View Post
... Several years ago, a Piper lost the engine at night after departing ...

... Yep, the engine was a H2AD, single drive double mag and the shaft had broken...
The H2AD on a Piper?

I thought this engine was a C172N-only powerplant.
__________________
Neal Howard
Airplaneless once again...
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-16-2008, 02:51 PM
Rivethead Rivethead is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Corvallis Oregon.
Posts: 680
Default

Here's one that's kind of off topic but not really. One day a few years back my son and I were taxiing behind a twin when one of the props on the twin struck and demolished one of the taxi way lights. I didn't see it happen but Tom did and told me about it. I parked the plane we were flying and decided to walk over to tell the pilot what had happened. As I suspected he hadn't even realized he'd struck anything. When looking at the prop the damage was clearly evident, the first inch of one blade was neatly curled over. I don't know what he did about it; I didn't stick around to see. If you were this guy what would you do?

Last edited by Rivethead : 02-16-2008 at 03:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-16-2008, 03:24 PM
John Clark's Avatar
John Clark John Clark is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,324
Default Park it and get on the phone.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rivethead View Post
Here's one that's kind of off topic but not really. One day a few years back my son and I were taxiing behind a twin when one of the props on the twin struck and demolished one of the taxi way lights. I didn't see it happen but Tom did and told me about it. I parked the plane we were flying and decided to walk over to tell the pilot what had happened. As I suspected he hadn't even realized he'd struck anything. When looking at the prop the damage was clearly evident, the first inch of one blade was neatly curled over. I don't what he did about it; I didn't stick around to see. If you were this guy what would you do?
For starters I'd make three phone calls. One to my insurance carrier, one to the airport authority, and one to my favorite engine shop.

John Clark
RV8 N18U "Sunshine"
KSBA
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:41 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.