|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

01-13-2008, 02:48 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,061
|
|
I see that he got coverage in the prestigious sounding American Antigravity Magazine 
__________________
Steve Zicree
Fullerton, Ca. w/beautiful 2.5 year old son 
RV-4 99% built  and sold 
Rag and tube project well under way
paid =VAF= dues through June 2013
|

01-13-2008, 04:10 PM
|
 |
VAF Moderator / Line Boy
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 12,247
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by szicree
I see that he got coverage in the prestigious sounding American Antigravity Magazine 
|
Yes, but I want to see if it gets picked up by the "International Journal of Perpetual Motion"... 
__________________
Paul F. Dye
Editor at Large - KITPLANES Magazine
RV-8 - N188PD - "Valkyrie"
RV-6 (By Marriage) - N164MS - "Mikey"
RV-3B - N13PL - "Tsamsiyu"
A&P, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor
Dayton Valley Airpark (A34)
http://Ironflight.com
|

01-13-2008, 08:06 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Keller, TX
Posts: 1,553
|
|
American Antigravity Magazine
According to the website the American Antigravity Magazine is not really a magazine, just a website.
Let's think about this rationally for a moment. 150 miles on a gallon of gas. There's only two ways this could happen:
1) The route is all downhill, with a tailwind
or
1) the vehicle is completely frictionless
2) the vehicle has zero aerodynamic drag
3) the terrain never rises (takes extra energy)
4) there is no head wind
I don't think 1 and 2 are going to happen and 3 and 4 are impractical.
Here's my bottom line. A gallon of gasoline only has so much energy, and one gallon just won't move a body of any mass 150 miles!
__________________
RV-8 180 hp IO-360 N247TD with 10" SkyView!
VAF Donations Made 8/2019 and 12/2019
"Cum omni alio deficiente, ludere mortuis."
(When all else fails, play dead.)
|

01-13-2008, 08:41 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,061
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubblehead
Here's my bottom line. A gallon of gasoline only has so much energy, and one gallon just won't move a body of any mass 150 miles!
|
I'm not saying it would be a practical car, but I think a vehicle that would carry a person 150 miles on a gallon of gas could easily be built. A very fit cyclist only produces about 300 watts or about half a horsepower. I think a half horsepower motor could run an awful long time on a gallon.
__________________
Steve Zicree
Fullerton, Ca. w/beautiful 2.5 year old son 
RV-4 99% built  and sold 
Rag and tube project well under way
paid =VAF= dues through June 2013
|

01-13-2008, 09:47 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,324
|
|
Been done
Quote:
Originally Posted by szicree
I'm not saying it would be a practical car, but I think a vehicle that would carry a person 150 miles on a gallon of gas could easily be built. A very fit cyclist only produces about 300 watts or about half a horsepower. I think a half horsepower motor could run an awful long time on a gallon.
|
No problem, it was done 27 years ago.
http://www.canosoarus.com/03CalifCommuter/CalCom01.htm
But the designer of the engine in question stated:
"By replacing an 800 pound V-8 engine with a 25 pound MYT and running it on biodiesel, we can achieve 150 miles per gallon in an otherwise conventional vehicle -- plus, you're going to have better take-off and stopping power by removing that 800 pound engine. That's what we can do. It is achievable." - Raphial Morgado
John Clark
RV8 N18U "Sunshine"
KSBA
|

01-13-2008, 10:52 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 920
|
|
Moller has been doing this for 30 years. Lots of jawboning, but 30 years of teathered flight and no working prototype. Pure scam.
http://www.moller.com/
|

01-14-2008, 08:52 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,324
|
|
Scam!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yukon
Moller has been doing this for 30 years. Lots of jawboning, but 30 years of teathered flight and no working prototype. Pure scam.
http://www.moller.com/
|
Yup! Pure scam and, I have a hunch, a living for Moller for 30 years. Much simpler than actually producing a product.
John Clark
RV8 N18U "Sunshine"
KSBA
|

01-17-2008, 06:49 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,231
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Clark
Speaking of credibility, here is a quote the inventor, Mr. Morgado:
"By replacing an 800 pound V-8 engine with a 25 pound MYT and running it on biodiesel, we can achieve 150 miles per gallon in an otherwise conventional vehicle -- plus, you're going to have better take-off and stopping power by removing that 800 pound engine. That's what we can do. It is achievable." - Raphial Morgado
I'm going to need a little convincing that an 800 cubic inch diesel will get 150 MPG in an SUV. He would have had my attention if he had just said something about the mileage improvement due to lower weigh of the powerplant. It is new "monkey motion" connected to what is a two-stroke diesel. It won't change the laws of thermodynamics. I am, however really interested is seeing how he seals the "slot" in the cylinder wall that connects the pistons to the system.
John Clark
RV8 N18U "Sunshine"
KSBA
|
Actually, if you watch the animation you will see that they accomplish a full 4-stroke action between the time the piston passes the intake port to the time it crosses the exhaust port.
I agree that differential heating will make keeping the piston centered in the track a real bear - but on the other hand there is no particular force that would prevent allowing the "piston" to slide in and out a bit on the "arm" to allow for a non-circular rotation path.
Sadly, no matter the outcome it is not likely the engine of the future unless they invent more oil...
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:53 PM.
|