VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-09-2008, 01:25 PM
prkaye prkaye is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,116
Default The next 35 years...

I just realized, 2008 is the 35th year for Van's Aircraft! Over the last 35 years, Vans aircraft have certainly had a large part to play in the significant advancements in homebuilding. The landscape for homebuilders is quite different now than it was 35 years ago (not that I'm old enough to remember, but from what i've read!).

I think it's interesting to ponder how much different again the homebuilt landscape may be in 2043 (another 35 years). Or even another 10 or 20 years? Any predictions on what's to come? My first bet would be a massive shift to a powerplant that uses something other than gasoline. I won't try to predict what the alternative fuel will be. Also, electronics will continue to evolve and things like EFIS and avionics will get better and better. What else? Let's bounce around some predictions!
__________________
Phil
RV9A (SB)
Flying since July 2010!
Ottawa, Canada
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-09-2008, 01:33 PM
Mel's Avatar
Mel Mel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,762
Default In the year BV...(Before Van's)

I remember before Van's, it was very common for someone to start a project, and then before they could get it finished, something new and better would come along. That has since changed!
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-09-2008, 01:47 PM
Vern's Avatar
Vern Vern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Peachtree City, Ga
Posts: 1,039
Question Predictions (always dangerous!)

If I'm alive,I'll be 92! Therefore, you 'whippersnappers' will be running the show. I've met some of the early pioneers in air and space and feel like I'm a historical link to great aviation events and aviators. By then, we will have lost most of the links to the 'good old days.'
Will the excitement for all things that fly still be here? Will we still have the freedoms to fly? Will we be able to afford it? It is getting more expensive than it was. I remember $300-900 Cubs and T-crafts. I bought one Luscombe for $450 and another for $950. I bought a C-172 for $1500. I turned down a $8,000 Staggerwing. I turned down a $5,000 Stinson Gullwing. I still have magazine ads requesting bids for the warbirds. P-51's, B-25's C-47's,etc for a few thousand.
Will today's classic aircraft be serviceable? Will anyone want to work on them? What will fuel them? Will the FAA still be the 'Friendly Aviation Administration',or will national survival dictate a suspension of our hobby as more 9/11 events unfold?
Will EAA and AOPA still be for grass roots aviation, or be 'corporate?' Will the next generation still be public-minded enough to fight the battles that lie ahead?
__________________
Vern Darley
Awarded FAA "The Wright Brothers 'Master Pilot' Award"- for 50 years safe flying

RV-6A N680V / RV-10QB N353RV
Luscombe 8E N2423K 50+years
Hatz Biplane N2423Z soon to be birthed
Falcon RV Squadron Founder
KFFC Hanger D-30
Peachtree City, Ga
770 310-7169
EAA Technical Counselor #5142
EAA Flight Advisor #486336
ATP/CFI/A&P/DAR
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-09-2008, 07:01 PM
TSwezey TSwezey is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 1,849
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by prkaye View Post

I think it's interesting to ponder how much different again the homebuilt landscape may be in 2043 (another 35 years). Or even another 10 or 20 years? Any predictions on what's to come? My first bet would be a massive shift to a powerplant that uses something other than gasoline. I won't try to predict what the alternative fuel will be. Also, electronics will continue to evolve and things like EFIS and avionics will get better and better. What else? Let's bounce around some predictions!
My guess is electric.
__________________
Todd
N110TD
RV-10 Vesta V8 LS2/BMA EFIS/One formerly flying at 3J1 Hobbs stopped at 150 hours
Savannah, GA and Ridgeland, SC
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-09-2008, 07:52 PM
Sid Lambert Sid Lambert is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Atlanta
Posts: 1,120
Default

Seeing the posts by Vern and TSwezty post reminds me of the old Aubrey Sweezy stories I heard from my father.

As a young 32 year old, I will never know aviation as it was back then.
__________________
Sid Lambert

RV-7 Sold
RV-4 - Flying - O-320 Fixed Pitch - Red over Yellow

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-09-2008, 09:53 PM
asav8tor asav8tor is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Seattle, wa
Posts: 679
Default

Avgas will be a minimum of $25/gal.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-09-2008, 10:19 PM
RichB RichB is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 97
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by asav8tor View Post
Avgas will be a minimum of $25/gal.
So we'll probably be running on biodiesel or SVO (straight vegetable oil, doesn't need to be chemically refined like biodiesel). That'll be in either piston aero-diesels or (more likely) small Innodyne-like turbines optimised for the fuel. With fuel costs that high, the low efficiency of the small turbines at low altitude won't be issue, and the business case for selling small turbines will have improved.

[dreaming]Or maybe someone will be clever enough to make a 2-shaft U-shaped turbine that adds extra stages to improve the efficiency in a small package.[/dreaming]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-09-2008, 10:40 PM
C-GRVT C-GRVT is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 305
Default Progress in aviation

I marvel both at the rapid advances in aviation (the United States puts men on the moon only 60 some years after Kitty Hawk), and at the same time some of the almost frozen in time aspects of what we do. "Stick and Rudder" published in 1944, is as relevant and useful a book today as it was in 1944.
When I take a break from building to watch a documentary on WWII aircraft, I see exactly the same building techniques used then as I am using now in my garage almost 70 years later.
I also wonder about the future of general aviation. I tend to think that the big drivers for change will not be so much advances in technology as external influences and pressures that will affect aviation incidentally - but will challenge our freedom/ability to enjoy this sport.
For example, governments (I'm thinking Canada and the U.S. here) jumping on the climate change bandwagon to restrict or make more costly the burning of fossil fuels (as an aside, I think the greatest risk in this climate change thing is rash overreaction by government); environmentalist types getting more traction with arguments that there has to be something wrong with airplanes in the sky that have no pollution controls and no mufflers; security types seeing a whole area of uncontrolled, unscreened activity in the skies; airlines lobbying to both shift costs to general aviation and limit access to the ever more crowded airspace - and governments wanting to be seen to be commiited to action on the security/airline/environment files. General aviation is an attractive target for government regulation being both highly visible and with limited political clout (who has sympathy for people foolish enough to risk their lives in small planes, who shouldn't be up in the sky anyway and cewrtainly not sharing airspace with commercial passenger aircraft, and who obviously must have too much money). I really do fear for the future.
But not enough not to order that $20,000 plus Lycoming clone!
Bill
RV-6A
Ottawa,
Canada
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-10-2008, 12:55 AM
sprucemoose's Avatar
sprucemoose sprucemoose is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MKE
Posts: 1,519
Default The future

http://www.sonexaircraft.com/press/r...pr_072407.html

I believe that this is the future of recreational aviation. And it will not take 35 years. It is my belief that this will be a commercial reality within 10 years. I for one find it fascinating and exciting.
__________________
Jeff Point
RV-6, RLU-1 built & flying
Tech Counselor, Flight Advisor & President, EAA Chapter 18
Milwaukee
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-10-2008, 01:26 AM
RichB RichB is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 97
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sprucemoose View Post
http://www.sonexaircraft.com/press/r...pr_072407.html

I believe that this is the future of recreational aviation. And it will not take 35 years. It is my belief that this will be a commercial reality within 10 years. I for one find it fascinating and exciting.
There's an interesting video about it over here... http://aeroconversions.com/e-flight/

Range still seems limited (up to 1 hour was mentioned), but it's still very very cool.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:49 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.