VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-05-2008, 07:35 PM
AlexPeterson's Avatar
AlexPeterson AlexPeterson is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Maple Grove, MN
Posts: 2,331
Default Flight Loads on Flaps

I saw somewhere on a recent posting some discussion of forces needed to deploy flaps. I have HDPE tape on the flap skins where they rub the wing top skin, and there are clear witness marks showing where the flaps are during flight. Of course, on the ground with no loading, they are down a bit further than these marks indicate. What is amazing is how little force it takes at the trailing edge of the flap to "raise" them to their highest flight position. I'd estimate it might be 15 pounds per flap. I'll try to measure it with a fish scale next time I'm at the hangar.

Of course, some brave or crazy guy who has manual flaps could get some altitude, use a fish scale, and post the results! I can't imagine how we can build and fly these planes without this important data!
__________________
Alex Peterson
RV6A N66AP 1700+ hours
KADC, Wadena, MN
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-05-2008, 10:08 PM
Ron Lee's Avatar
Ron Lee Ron Lee is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,275
Default I'll bite

Do you want the force needed to raise the manual flap to the first, second and third detents?

If so, I would suggest 100 mph for the first, 90 mph for the second and 85 mph for the third.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-06-2008, 12:24 AM
Norman CYYJ Norman CYYJ is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Victoria B.C.
Posts: 1,265
Default

You have to have a very strong arm to move the flaps at 100mph. I have found at that speed it takes two hands to lower them, mind you I am not that strong either.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-06-2008, 02:36 AM
gasman gasman is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sonoma County
Posts: 3,821
Default

I have two notches of flaps. First notch is at 100 mph down wind. The pull is about as hard as setting the E brake on a 70 VW. My flap handle is cut short, and lowered to the floor and left just high enough to get my fingers around it. Now I don't have to lift as far to set the flaps.
To extend to full flaps, I wait till I am on base and at 85 mph. I have altered my flap bracket so I don't push the button for the second and final notch of flaps. I can just reach and pull and it is done. BUT 85 IS THE MAGIC NUMBER.

I love these flaps and would not even think of going electric after reading about all of the problems that people have had................ well, maybe if I gained 75 pounds I might need to go electric. But for now, EL Manual!!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-06-2008, 06:43 AM
rocketbob's Avatar
rocketbob rocketbob is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 8I3
Posts: 3,562
Default

I love my manual flaps too. For kicks I have put some flap down in cruise to see what effects the trailing edge have on the trim of the airplane, maybe 5 degrees. I just held it there since there's no notch at that point. The airplane will pitch nose down slightly but it has suprisingly little affect on speed and trim. I'm guessing the trailing edge was down maybe an inch. I've also put flaps down at 120 and it takes a heck of a pull to do that. Much easier the slower you get.

I have done some tests and found the difference between half flap and full flap has a negligible effect on stall speed, 1-2 knots. The stall however is less abrupt. So I started landing with half flaps a few years ago and found that I consistently get better landings, especially three point. Landings seem just as short.
__________________

Please don't PM me! Email only!

Bob Japundza CFI A&PIA
N9187P PA-24-260B Comanche, flying
N678X F1 Rocket, under const.
N244BJ RV-6 "victim of SNF tornado" 1200+ hrs, rebuilding
N8155F C150 flying
N7925P PA-24-250 Comanche, restoring
Not a thing I own is stock.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-06-2008, 06:49 AM
Mel's Avatar
Mel Mel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,762
Default 3-Notches

My flap handle is build like Gasman's except that I have 3 notches. I deploy to first notch (12 degrees) at 105-110 mph.
Specs call for up to 20 degrees at 110. Full deflection at 100.
I also agree with Bob in that the last notch has little effect on stall speed, but it does add drag, so I still use full flaps for short fields.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>

Last edited by Mel : 01-06-2008 at 06:52 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-07-2008, 05:40 AM
Bob Axsom Bob Axsom is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,685
Default Flap Loads?

I owned a Piper Archer II with manual flaps for 22 years and I loved the operational flexibility they gave me but they were not an option on the standard quickbuilt RV-6A. I thought I would miss the ability to go to full flaps and slip through holes on circle to land instrument approaches like VOR-A to El Monte (EMT). In fact it has not proven to be a problem. When the plane slows to the top of the white arc on the airspeed indicator I depress the flap switch an glance at them out of the canopy and release the switch when they stop moving. The original flight testing by Van and countless over speed deployments of the flaps by the more than 2,248 RV-6 airplanes give me assurance that operation within the white arc will not cause a problem and the spring in the system is not a problem for me. All I want is the drag they provide at full deflection and every approach is a short approach where practical. I have stainless steel on the leading edge of the flaps and the trailing edge of the stainless steel exactly aligns with the trailing edge of the wing skin. There are no marks on the flaps aft of the stainless steel and flaps do not raise above the ailerons and wing tip line in flight. I am a little curious why this caused you concern. I know you have been flying your plane for quite a while - do you suspect an anomaly in your installation? I would imagine that there is more slack in the manual flap system like there is in my manual pitch trim system.

Bob Axsom

Last edited by Bob Axsom : 01-07-2008 at 05:43 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-07-2008, 07:09 AM
AlexPeterson's Avatar
AlexPeterson AlexPeterson is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Maple Grove, MN
Posts: 2,331
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Axsom View Post
I owned a Piper Archer II with manual flaps for 22 years and I loved the operational flexibility they gave me but they were not an option on the standard quickbuilt RV-6A. I thought I would miss the ability to go to full flaps and slip through holes on circle to land instrument approaches like VOR-A to El Monte (EMT). In fact it has not proven to be a problem. When the plane slows to the top of the white arc on the airspeed indicator I depress the flap switch an glance at them out of the canopy and release the switch when they stop moving. The original flight testing by Van and countless over speed deployments of the flaps by the more than 2,248 RV-6 airplanes give me assurance that operation within the white arc will not cause a problem and the spring in the system is not a problem for me. All I want is the drag they provide at full deflection and every approach is a short approach where practical. I have stainless steel on the leading edge of the flaps and the trailing edge of the stainless steel exactly aligns with the trailing edge of the wing skin. There are no marks on the flaps aft of the stainless steel and flaps do not raise above the ailerons and wing tip line in flight. I am a little curious why this caused you concern. I know you have been flying your plane for quite a while - do you suspect an anomaly in your installation? I would imagine that there is more slack in the manual flap system like there is in my manual pitch trim system.

Bob Axsom
Bob, were you referring to me? I have no anomolies, just an observation. BTW, just to be clear, I'm talking about how much deflection from full down flap position there is between static and flight loading. You should be able to see the same affect on yours. Lower the flaps completely, and look to see if you see witness scratches which show where the flaps generally are in flight when fully down.
__________________
Alex Peterson
RV6A N66AP 1700+ hours
KADC, Wadena, MN
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-07-2008, 08:26 AM
Bob Axsom Bob Axsom is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,685
Default OK that makes more sense

OK that makes more sense to me but I have the same basic conclusion. I would certainly expect the flaps to yield to full down air loads at max flap speed.

Bob Axsom
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:49 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.