|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

12-20-2007, 10:25 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pasadena CA
Posts: 2,484
|
|
Cherokee 180, Cessna 177, Grumman AA5, '64 or later Mooney for four seaters
AA1B or later, RV-4 for two seaters.
__________________
Stephen Samuelian, CFII, A&P IA, CTO
RV4 wing in Jig @ KPOC
RV7 emp built
|

12-21-2007, 01:28 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MKE
Posts: 1,519
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geico266
For that kinda of money you can buy a flyable, early slow build, RV-6 / 6A, have a ball flying it for a few years, sell it and get your all of your money back.
|
I agree with others that a 4 might be a good temporary airplane. However, I can't recall ever seeing a flying 6/ 6A in this price range. There was one advertised recently for about $69K and the response was, wow what a bargain.
__________________
Jeff Point
RV-6, RLU-1 built & flying
Tech Counselor, Flight Advisor & President, EAA Chapter 18
Milwaukee
|

12-21-2007, 01:55 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,685
|
|
I owned a Piper Archer II
I owned a Piper Archer II that I flew to work every day in LA. It was an outstanding airplane that I flew all over the country and Canada and Mexico but if I did not own it and use it as I did I would have rented and not flown very much during the build process. I built the plane to keep my costs down after retirement but it costs a lot to build one and maintain another one. I sold my Archer for for ~$50,000 after buying it for $52,000 and flying it for 22 years. I agree with the 172 recommendation if you feel you have to buy one.
Bob Axsom
|

12-21-2007, 03:35 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,357
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevDad
I had also thought about getting a -4, and flying it for awhile before I even start my project.
The other option would be something like a Grumman or similar.
|
What is the mission?
The RV-4 and the Grumman AA5 you linked to are very, very different types of aircraft. The fact that you are considering both suggests you haven't really figured out what type of flying you want to do.
Before you drop a bunch of cash on an aircraft, you should do a bit of self-introspection and discern what exactly you hope to achieve with this aircraft. Then it should be much clearer which aircraft types are suitable.
|

12-21-2007, 05:00 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Pecan Plantation, Tx.
Posts: 128
|
|
Piper Warrior
I had a piper warrior. My advice. Don't do it. Even being newer (1985) I spent a ton of money over 3 years just in annuals alone. My cheapest annual was $2800. It also took time to sell. Rent or buy what you want. I bought a -6A. Its an older one, but nice and it was $55k.
__________________
Bryan Ray
RV-6A
|

12-21-2007, 05:43 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,505
|
|
I owned a straight tail 172 for 8 years and it was a great airplane, just slow. Maintenance costs were very low as was insurance. I sold it for $8,000 more than I paid if you don't figure the money I spent fixing it up which wasn't a lot. The Yankee AA1-B is fun to fly but two seats. A 150 HP version is a good airplane. I would stay away from anything with bladder fuel tanks if you want to fly cheap.
JMHO!
__________________
Jim Wright
RV-9A N9JW 90919 SoldArkansas
http://www.jimsairplanes.com
_______________________
"It's a brutal struggle for the biscuit."
|

12-21-2007, 05:43 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 361
|
|
Whatever you do don't get a Kitfox
Because that's what I've been looking for to fly while I build my 4. Oh wait, you're in Florida. Nevermind. But just remember I've got dibs on any 4-stroke Kitfox-4's that show up in Texas!
A Kitfox is about as fast as my Cherokee was and a lot cheaper to keep -- you can trailer it home and do your own maintenance. And it only burns about 5 gph.
After owning an experimental, I can't imagine ever flying certified again. Who wants to maintain a 30-year-old antique?
__________________
Jon Baker
RV6A sold, RV4 in-progress
Houston
|

12-21-2007, 05:55 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Huskerland, USA
Posts: 5,862
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DevDad
I'd imagine that it's relatively simple to get right around what you paid for a $35Kish airplane.
Thoughts?
Mike
|
Only if it's experimental, and easy if it is an RV.
__________________
RV-7 : In the hangar
RV-10 : In the hangar
RV-12 : Built and sold
RV-44 : 4 place helicopter on order.
|

12-21-2007, 06:00 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Huskerland, USA
Posts: 5,862
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sprucemoose
I agree with others that a 4 might be a good temporary airplane. However, I can't recall ever seeing a flying 6/ 6A in this price range.
|
There have been several bought and sold in the $38 -$50K range. You just have to know where to look.
__________________
RV-7 : In the hangar
RV-10 : In the hangar
RV-12 : Built and sold
RV-44 : 4 place helicopter on order.
|

12-21-2007, 06:00 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: England
Posts: 1,087
|
|
I bought an RV-6A, and have had a ball flying for the last 5 years!! That's the problem, you spend more time flying/maintaining/upgrading your I'll-just-get-something-while-I-build-the-RV airplane that progress on the 'main' project slows down. A 172 might not be a bad choice either - I would suggest something that is easy to sell when you need the money to finish off the RV-7.
Pete
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:58 PM.
|