|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

12-11-2007, 08:30 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Broomfield, CO
Posts: 639
|
|
Boeing puts 6 cylinder Subaru in UAV Helicopter???
This should make the Sube crowd proud. Read below article, 2nd to last paragraph mentions Boeing putting a six cylinder Subaru into the UAV helo that the article is referring to.
http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?C...365e79560cc&#d
__________________
RV-7 Flying since 2004
1,100 hrs+
Last edited by Tandem46 : 12-11-2007 at 08:33 PM.
|

12-11-2007, 11:19 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Seattle, wa
Posts: 679
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tobinbasford
|
I'm not sure if you're kidding? Proud? It crashed ! I had wrote in another thread enough money thrown at the problem could solve any issue. If Boeing under DOD money can't make a Subaru work, I take it back.
|

12-12-2007, 06:33 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mendon South Carolina
Posts: 1,391
|
|
I think it unreasonable at this point to presume that the crash was caused by the Sube.
Pure engine or gearbox failure more likely would have resulted in autorotation.
Maybe we should point boeing to a couple of threads here where they can find out that...
A sube can't possibly ever work
Flying a Sube will get a lawyer on your butt
Any one in management who considers a Sube is [ed. this word removed by DR].
But then again Boeing history is replete with dumb ideas like the 727, 747, B17 aren't they?
__________________
Milt Concannon
Last edited by DeltaRomeo : 12-12-2007 at 07:48 AM.
|

12-12-2007, 08:38 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dallas
Posts: 302
|
|
Suboeing??
I will be the first to lay money it was not an engine failure. The project is interesting to me anyway in that a real DARPA funded operation chose, of all things, a Subaru and Boeing did not go out and immediately replace it with some traditional aviation powerplant.
This could some day be the beginning of the breakthrough we all need for a truly modern light GA powerplant. A little DARPA money(in their terms) and a lot of Boeing knowhow could EASILY sort out the challenges all the SUBIE people live with and simply do not have the resources to overcome.
At least we can dream......
__________________
Chuck Wallace, M.D.
RV-8 "Free Bird" ECI O-360, Hartzell BAFP, All the cool stuff I can find......
N882Z
RV-10 N184KW Bought flying.....
Dallas, Texas
|

12-12-2007, 10:09 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Norway, Stj?rdal
Posts: 598
|
|
I don't know. Somehow I find it highly unlikely that Boeing would go ahead further using a powerplant that is totally unsupported by the manufacturer for it's use in an aircraft. But who knows, maybe Subaru see some potential in UAV, so it's not totally unsupported?
|

12-12-2007, 10:39 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Broomfield, CO
Posts: 639
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by asav8tor
I'm not sure if you're kidding? Proud? It crashed !
|
Whoah! I never said, nor did the article say, that the one that crashed even had a Sube in it or that the crash was engine related. If you read the other articles linked to the one I posted, it looks like they've been flying those UAV's with turbines, not Subes.
__________________
RV-7 Flying since 2004
1,100 hrs+
|

12-12-2007, 10:52 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 920
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by N395V
I think it unreasonable at this point to presume that the crash was caused by the Sube.
Pure engine or gearbox failure more likely would have resulted in autorotation.
Maybe we should point boeing to a couple of threads here where they can find out that...
A sube can't possibly ever work
Flying a Sube will get a lawyer on your butt
Any one in management who considers a Sube is [ed. this word removed by DR].
But then again Boeing history is replete with dumb ideas like the 727, 747, B17 aren't they?
|
It's a lively discussion when moderators are moderating moderators! Got to love it!
Hey guys......What do you call a Marine fighter pilot with an IQ of 160?????
|

12-12-2007, 11:20 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Defiance, MO
Posts: 1,666
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tobinbasford
Whoah! I never said, nor did the article say, that the one that crashed even had a Sube in it or that the crash was engine related. If you read the other articles linked to the one I posted, it looks like they've been flying those UAV's with turbines, not Subes.
|
The first A160 had a four cylinder Subaru engine which was upgraded to a 6 cylinder in another A160 with it's first flight Nov 30, 2005. The operational version, a A160T, has a turbine engine and first flew June 15th this year. It was a A160T that crashed on Monday.
__________________
Philip
RV-6A - 14+ years, 900+ hours
Based at 1H0 (Creve Coeur)
Paid dues yearly since 2007
|

12-12-2007, 11:27 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 920
|
|
Darn, there goes a good thread right down the drain! 
|

12-12-2007, 11:37 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 920
|
|
Mo Power
No, we can salvage this! Even the big guys cave in to hype! Program begins with a 4 cyl Subie, moves up to a 6 cyl Subie, ends up with a turbine. Sound familiar?
http://www.physorg.com/news8776.html
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:52 PM.
|