VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Alternative Engines
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-11-2007, 08:30 PM
Tandem46's Avatar
Tandem46 Tandem46 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Broomfield, CO
Posts: 639
Default Boeing puts 6 cylinder Subaru in UAV Helicopter???

This should make the Sube crowd proud. Read below article, 2nd to last paragraph mentions Boeing putting a six cylinder Subaru into the UAV helo that the article is referring to.

http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?C...365e79560cc&#d
__________________
RV-7 Flying since 2004
1,100 hrs+

Last edited by Tandem46 : 12-11-2007 at 08:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-11-2007, 11:19 PM
asav8tor asav8tor is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Seattle, wa
Posts: 679
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tobinbasford View Post
This should make the Sube crowd proud. Read below article, 2nd to last paragraph mentions Boeing putting a six cylinder Subaru into the UAV helo that the article is referring to.

http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?C...365e79560cc&#d

I'm not sure if you're kidding? Proud? It crashed ! I had wrote in another thread enough money thrown at the problem could solve any issue. If Boeing under DOD money can't make a Subaru work, I take it back.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-12-2007, 06:33 AM
N395V's Avatar
N395V N395V is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mendon South Carolina
Posts: 1,391
Default

I think it unreasonable at this point to presume that the crash was caused by the Sube.

Pure engine or gearbox failure more likely would have resulted in autorotation.


Maybe we should point boeing to a couple of threads here where they can find out that...


A sube can't possibly ever work

Flying a Sube will get a lawyer on your butt

Any one in management who considers a Sube is [ed. this word removed by DR].


But then again Boeing history is replete with dumb ideas like the 727, 747, B17 aren't they?
__________________



Milt Concannon

Last edited by DeltaRomeo : 12-12-2007 at 07:48 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-12-2007, 08:38 AM
cawmd82's Avatar
cawmd82 cawmd82 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dallas
Posts: 302
Default Suboeing??

I will be the first to lay money it was not an engine failure. The project is interesting to me anyway in that a real DARPA funded operation chose, of all things, a Subaru and Boeing did not go out and immediately replace it with some traditional aviation powerplant.

This could some day be the beginning of the breakthrough we all need for a truly modern light GA powerplant. A little DARPA money(in their terms) and a lot of Boeing knowhow could EASILY sort out the challenges all the SUBIE people live with and simply do not have the resources to overcome.

At least we can dream......
__________________
Chuck Wallace, M.D.
RV-8 "Free Bird" ECI O-360, Hartzell BAFP, All the cool stuff I can find......
N882Z

RV-10 N184KW Bought flying.....
Dallas, Texas
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-12-2007, 10:09 AM
SvingenB SvingenB is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Norway, Stj?rdal
Posts: 598
Default

I don't know. Somehow I find it highly unlikely that Boeing would go ahead further using a powerplant that is totally unsupported by the manufacturer for it's use in an aircraft. But who knows, maybe Subaru see some potential in UAV, so it's not totally unsupported?
__________________
RV-4 #4520, Slow built
B Svingen
RV-4 Project Log
Onex Project Log

EAA Chapter 573 Norway
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-12-2007, 10:39 AM
Tandem46's Avatar
Tandem46 Tandem46 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Broomfield, CO
Posts: 639
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by asav8tor View Post
I'm not sure if you're kidding? Proud? It crashed !

Whoah! I never said, nor did the article say, that the one that crashed even had a Sube in it or that the crash was engine related. If you read the other articles linked to the one I posted, it looks like they've been flying those UAV's with turbines, not Subes.
__________________
RV-7 Flying since 2004
1,100 hrs+
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-12-2007, 10:52 AM
Yukon Yukon is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 920
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N395V View Post
I think it unreasonable at this point to presume that the crash was caused by the Sube.

Pure engine or gearbox failure more likely would have resulted in autorotation.


Maybe we should point boeing to a couple of threads here where they can find out that...


A sube can't possibly ever work

Flying a Sube will get a lawyer on your butt

Any one in management who considers a Sube is [ed. this word removed by DR].


But then again Boeing history is replete with dumb ideas like the 727, 747, B17 aren't they?

It's a lively discussion when moderators are moderating moderators! Got to love it!

Hey guys......What do you call a Marine fighter pilot with an IQ of 160?????
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-12-2007, 11:20 AM
plehrke's Avatar
plehrke plehrke is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Defiance, MO
Posts: 1,666
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tobinbasford View Post
Whoah! I never said, nor did the article say, that the one that crashed even had a Sube in it or that the crash was engine related. If you read the other articles linked to the one I posted, it looks like they've been flying those UAV's with turbines, not Subes.

The first A160 had a four cylinder Subaru engine which was upgraded to a 6 cylinder in another A160 with it's first flight Nov 30, 2005. The operational version, a A160T, has a turbine engine and first flew June 15th this year. It was a A160T that crashed on Monday.
__________________
Philip
RV-6A - 14+ years, 900+ hours
Based at 1H0 (Creve Coeur)
Paid dues yearly since 2007
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-12-2007, 11:27 AM
Yukon Yukon is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 920
Default

Darn, there goes a good thread right down the drain!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-12-2007, 11:37 AM
Yukon Yukon is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 920
Default Mo Power

No, we can salvage this! Even the big guys cave in to hype! Program begins with a 4 cyl Subie, moves up to a 6 cyl Subie, ends up with a turbine. Sound familiar?

http://www.physorg.com/news8776.html
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:52 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.