|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|
|
View Poll Results: Do (or will) you require 100LL for your RV?
|
|
Yes
|
 
|
69 |
50.74% |
|
No
|
 
|
61 |
44.85% |
|
Don't know
|
 
|
6 |
4.41% |

12-11-2007, 02:17 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: LSGY
Posts: 3,173
|
|
Do you require 100LL?
The question is do you currently require 100LL for your flying RV, or will you require 100LL for your RV when it flies?
|

12-11-2007, 04:06 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Davis, CA
Posts: 1,156
|
|
According to Superior, the parallel valve IO-360 that I bought from them for my RV-7 is rated for car gas. After experiencing the improvement that unleaded fuel made to the sludge... er, oil, in the crankcases of my motorcycles back when car gas made the switch, I'd be completely happy to never burn a liter of 100LL. Probably gonna be flying before that becomes practical though.
__________________
Lars Pedersen
Davis, CA
RV-7 Flying as of June 24, 2012
960+ hours as of June 30, 2020. Where did the time go?
|

12-11-2007, 04:16 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 361
|
|
42% need it? Yeah, right.
You should have clarified who actually needs 100LL. If you're running 9.5:1 or better compression in a Lycoming, you need 100LL. If you're not, 95 (or even 93) octane unlead will work just fine. How about a new poll for people running better than 9.5:1 compression?
__________________
Jon Baker
RV6A sold, RV4 in-progress
Houston
|

12-11-2007, 05:42 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: spokane, wa
Posts: 805
|
|
I would like to see a push for 95 unleaded gas for aviation available. That way we can see how many people actually will use that 100LL stuff.
I know when auto gas went unleaded there was the same type of discussions. The unleaded gas was slowly brought in and then the leaded was taken out all together. What I noticed after that was a much better engine, better technology. So get rid of that 100LL and bring on the better engine.
|

12-11-2007, 05:53 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,275
|
|
I am using 9.5:1 pistons
Hence my YES vote for 100LL. Now whether I need the lead at its current level is unknown. Supposedly I need the octane to prevent detonation but even that may be unneeded IF I keep CHTs under some TBD value.
|

12-11-2007, 11:20 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pasadena CA
Posts: 2,484
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Lee
Hence my YES vote for 100LL. Now whether I need the lead at its current level is unknown. Supposedly I need the octane to prevent detonation but even that may be unneeded IF I keep CHTs under some TBD value.
|
Yes, if you have a certified lyc, you need avgas.
__________________
Stephen Samuelian, CFII, A&P IA, CTO
RV4 wing in Jig @ KPOC
RV7 emp built
|

12-12-2007, 12:18 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Belgium
Posts: 645
|
|
95 and 98 octane!
Here in Europe we have 95 and 98 octane car gas (some places may also have 91 octane).
So, if you check all your seals, O-rings and gaskets in the fuel system for compatibility with ethanol and design your fuel system correctly (f.e.: return line to the tank) running on car gas should not be an issue for an experimental. All the Rotax guys have been running car gas for many years now!
__________________
"Pilottonny"
Tonny Tromp
Lanaken, Belgium (EU)
RV9A, Registration: PH-VAN
ECI-Titan IOX-320 with dual EI, turning a Whirlwind 200RV CS prop.
Sold
|

12-12-2007, 05:32 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,295
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by osxuser
Yes, if you have a certified lyc, you need avgas.
|
Having a certified Lycoming has nothing to do with it. Maybe I'm not getting your point? It's all about compression ratios with Lycomings and clones.
__________________
"What kind of man would live where there is no daring? I don't believe in taking foolish chances but nothing can be accomplished without taking any chance at all." - Charles A. Lindbergh
Jamie | RV-7A First Flight: 7/27/2007 (Sold)
|

12-12-2007, 06:15 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Huskerland, USA
Posts: 5,862
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonbakerok
You should have clarified who actually needs 100LL. If you're running 9.5:1 or better compression in a Lycoming, you need 100LL. If you're not, 95 (or even 93) octane unlead will work just fine. How about a new poll for people running better than 9.5:1 compression?
|
I was running 10.5 : 1 pistons in my 0-360 and used a mixture of 50/50 92 Octance car gas & 100LL. Worked great, and saved about $40 everytime I filled up. Mixing is an option also.
__________________
RV-7 : In the hangar
RV-10 : In the hangar
RV-12 : Built and sold
RV-44 : 4 place helicopter on order.
|

12-12-2007, 07:52 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bountiful, Utah
Posts: 161
|
|
Isn't the real question whether air cooled engines can lubricate exhaust valves adequately w/o lead additives? Valve failures are already one of the sensitive areas with air cooling- going to nonleaded fuel might just make that problem worse. I believe auto engines use hardended valve seats to allow nonleaded fuel.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:13 AM.
|