|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

07-13-2005, 09:50 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,166
|
|
Mounting the tip-up canopy release vertically?
I think it was Roberta that mentioned something about mounting the canopy release mechanism for the tip-up in a vertical orientation. Instead of having the handle come out the middle of the instrument panel, it's at the bottom of the subpanel. Anybody know what I'm talking about? I can visualize how it would work, but would really like to see a picture of it. (And I'm already aware of the arguments for throwing out the release mechanism.)
Dave
|

07-14-2005, 06:26 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,762
|
|
Dave,
If you don't intend to use the canopy jettison feature in flight, it is fine to mount it as you say. I have done several this way. Generally I just extend the pivot shaft straight down behind the sub-panel so that you turn the handle to release the canopy hinges.
Mel...DAR
|

07-14-2005, 06:38 AM
|
 |
Moderator/Tech Counselor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: East Troy, WI
Posts: 1,983
|
|
Actually, I think I said (or meant) the handle was horizontal, so it would not interfer with the radios. Sorry if I confused anyone. Sounds like a good idea to have it work from underneath.
Roberta
|

07-14-2005, 08:52 AM
|
 |
been here awhile
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 4,300
|
|
canopy release mod
Quote:
|
I can visualize how it would work, but would really like to see a picture of it.
|
Hit this link and scroll down nearly to the bottom of the page:
http://thervjournal.com/finish5.html
Sam Buchanan
|

07-14-2005, 09:14 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,166
|
|
Thanks for the picture Sam. I was picturing something much more complicated. That looks fairly easy.
I was actually thinking the under-subpanel option could be reached in flight. Now that I think about it, you'd have to unbuckle to reach it--not a good idea, especially when you're theoretically ditching the canopy. Guess I need to re-think the in-flight jettison capability decision.
Dave
|

07-14-2005, 09:35 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: ...
Posts: 2,049
|
|
Better wear a chute on every flight...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Davepar
I was actually thinking the under-subpanel option could be reached in flight. Now that I think about it, you'd have to unbuckle to reach it--not a good idea, especially when you're theoretically ditching the canopy. Guess I need to re-think the in-flight jettison capability decision.
|
You gonna wear a chute on every flight? Your passenger as well? If you're not going to wear a chute consistently...all the time...then I wouldn't expect to extract any value from in-flight jettison capability!
Not trying to convince you either way on whether or not to install some sort of mechanism -- but be realistic about how useful it will be in flight.
)_( Dan
RV-7 N714D
http://www.rvproject.com
|

07-14-2005, 11:20 AM
|
 |
been here awhile
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 4,300
|
|
jettison the canopy jettison!
Quote:
|
Mr. Dan surmised: Not trying to convince you either way on whether or not to install some sort of mechanism -- but be realistic about how useful it will be in flight.
|
Yep, if I was doing it over, there would be no canopy release stuff in my plane. By getting rid of the canopy release, not only do you save the hassle of building the mechanism, you can make use of the center of the panel for avionics.
I have not had a single instance of needing to remove the canopy on my plane for maintainance in nearly six years of flying, even during the course of extensive panel upgrades. And.........I am convinced it would be impossible to jettison the thing in flight.
Sam Buchanan
|

07-14-2005, 12:36 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Shellmans Bluff, GA
Posts: 517
|
|
no release
After reviewing this issue for months before I needed to actually install it, I decided to go without the release mechanism; even though it would be useful for better access behind the panel, which should not be underrated. Even though the Tip Up gives better access than the slider, real work on the panel is limited unless you can remove the canopy completely. In fact, the more I think about it, it's not that hard to install and if I had to do it again, I might use it. The only reason being easier access to the panel.
In flight, I decided that it would have no benefit and in the event of a landing accident flip over, it would have some, but not much benefit. I am sure that my conclusions are similar to others who went without it. Read Dan Checkoway's analysis on his website. It helped me decide.
Disclaimer: I am a 1st time builder and far from an expert. I would also call Van's tech support and get their spin on this as well.
I just read Sam's new comment. I'm glad we have made this issue clear....:-)
__________________
RV9A N489JE - Flying
Eagle Neck Airpark
Shellmans Bluff, Georgia
Last edited by Build9A : 07-14-2005 at 12:43 PM.
Reason: update
|

07-14-2005, 01:27 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: northwest georgia
Posts: 315
|
|
canopy release
I built the release mechanism, but shortened the handle to stick only thru the subpanel.
works fine.
haven't had any reason the take the canopy off yet.
JMHO
cary r
|

07-14-2005, 01:30 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: northwest georgia
Posts: 315
|
|
canopy release
just one other thing......
I replaced the two small steel tubes with a modified alum angle.
Its much easier to work with than the split ends on the tubes.
cary
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:00 AM.
|