NSI vs Eggenfellner

[L.Adamson]

Originally Posted by rvsxer

EGT spread means nothing. As long as they peak together, as they should with flow-balanced cylinders and nozzles you are good to go. Don't take my word for it, though. Every article I've read on the subject (Aviation Consumer, EAA Sport Aviation, etc.) says just that...

Of course, with the exception of yesterday, this thread is seven years old.

For instance............ from 7/05

Im not even going to use a Subaru, but in honest analysis I find it a better engine than a Lycoming on every count. THIS DOESN'T MEAN THAT IT WILL BE BETTER IN AN AIRCRAFT. That depends on how well it is setup for aircraft. Eggenfellners package is a good one and even the most mechanically challenged (who are capable of building an RV) should have no problems with it.

Some thoughts may have changed, since that was written.

[rvsxer]

Originally Posted by L.Adamson

Of course, with the exception of yesterday, this thread is seven years old.

For instance............ from 7/05

Im not even going to use a Subaru, but in honest analysis I find it a better engine than a Lycoming on every count. THIS DOESN'T MEAN THAT IT WILL BE BETTER IN AN AIRCRAFT. That depends on how well it is setup for aircraft. Eggenfellners package is a good one and even the most mechanically challenged (who are capable of building an RV) should have no problems with it.

Some thoughts may have changed, since that was written.

I'm sorry, Larry (and Ross). I just had to think awhile about my reply...

[brian]

Originally Posted by acent05

Just put deposit on RV-7 with Egg 4cyl (0 Total Time) and MT composite 3 blade prop (150 hrs. TT) I am converting to IO 360 and constant speed and would like to move this whole firewall forward package if you are interested.

I think you'll want to put this in the Classifieds section. It will also be helpful to potential buyers if you specify which Egg 4 cyl (supercharged, non-supercharged, STi), as I'm sure that's the first question they'd be asking.