VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-23-2007, 10:52 PM
joeboisselle joeboisselle is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: White Swan Wa.
Posts: 366
Question Engine timing for 92 oct. vs 100LL problem

I didn't want to hijack the thread on 100ll so I thought I'd ask in a new one. So riddle me this... I've got 1 hour smoh on my lyc o-360. I purchased 10 gal of 100ll at the local airport for nearly $6 a gallon (could be slightly old) and filled it into the right tank. I then went to the local Texaco and bought 10 gallons of 92 octane and filled it into the left tank. When running the engine on the 92 oct. I get a mag drop of around 75 rpm, both sides. On the 100ll I get a mag drop of about 300 on the right and 400 on the left!! I'm using the original slick mags set dead on at 25 deg btc as per the overhaul manual. Any thoughts? I'd like the option of being able to fly somewhere and purchase 100ll without worrying about it.
__________________
Joe Boisselle
2010 RV-4
1941 Luscombe 8C

Last edited by joeboisselle : 10-25-2007 at 01:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-24-2007, 06:38 AM
N941WR's Avatar
N941WR N941WR is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
Default

Joe,

I'm not sure about the timing but I have been told not to run auto fuel until after the engine is broken in, say 10 to 15 hours.

Just what I've heard, so take it with a grain of sand.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-24-2007, 12:44 PM
DanH's Avatar
DanH DanH is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 08A
Posts: 9,477
Default

Well, I'l take a wild stab. The 100LL has a lower Reid vapor pressure (less easily atomized) and a high lead content/octane rating (slower flame front travel, something that becomes noticable with only one plug operating). The 92 octane car gas would atomize better (less intake wall wetting, and uniform burn of what makes it to the chamber) and burn across the wide chamber more quickly.

A guess, no study. It would be interesting to hear from someone with more combustion research experience.
__________________
Dan Horton
RV-8 SS
Barrett IO-390
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-25-2007, 06:33 AM
jonbakerok's Avatar
jonbakerok jonbakerok is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 361
Default Somethings wrong with the 100LL

You shouldn't get a 300 rpm drop on a mag check regardless of what gas you're using.

The fact that the mag check on cargas from the other tank was normal merely proves that something was wrong with the gas in the other tank and not the engine. Or maybe you aren't getting full fuel flow from the bad tank, causing it to run lean.
__________________
Jon Baker
RV6A sold, RV4 in-progress
Houston
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-25-2007, 09:32 AM
rv6ejguy's Avatar
rv6ejguy rv6ejguy is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 5,745
Default

Ran many auto engines on the dyno with 100LL and 92 mogas. In most cases, both required about the same ignition advance (barring detonation) to make max power. 100LL does not burn slower or we'd have to advance timing to achieve PCP (peak cylinder pressure) at the optimal crankpin angle.

Sounds like you may have some old fuel there. I've seen major variations with this aspect, even to the point where the engine won't start at all or having serious detonation under load. Mogas seems to degrade faster than avgas in hot climates in my experience. This generally takes years however. Is the avgas that old?
__________________

Ross Farnham, Calgary, Alberta
Turbo Subaru EJ22, SDS EFI, Marcotte M-300, IVO, Shorai- RV6A C-GVZX flying from CYBW since 2003- 441.0 hrs. on the Hobbs,
RV10 95% built- Sold 2016
http://www.sdsefi.com/aircraft.html
http://sdsefi.com/cpi2.htm


Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-25-2007, 01:28 PM
joeboisselle joeboisselle is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: White Swan Wa.
Posts: 366
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N941WR View Post
Joe,

I'm not sure about the timing but I have been told not to run auto fuel until after the engine is broken in, say 10 to 15 hours.

Just what I've heard, so take it with a grain of sand.
Grain of sand taken! This is kinda what I was planning to do, but after spending around $60 on the 10 gallons, I opted for 92 oct.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonbakerok View Post
You shouldn't get a 300 rpm drop on a mag check regardless of what gas you're using.

The fact that the mag check on cargas from the other tank was normal merely proves that something was wrong with the gas in the other tank and not the engine. Or maybe you aren't getting full fuel flow from the bad tank, causing it to run lean.
I hadn't thought of fuel flow, I'll be sure to check the fuel pressure guage next time. Thanks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rv6ejguy View Post
Ran many auto engines on the dyno with 100LL and 92 mogas. In most cases, both required about the same ignition advance (barring detonation) to make max power. 100LL does not burn slower or we'd have to advance timing to achieve PCP (peak cylinder pressure) at the optimal crankpin angle.

Sounds like you may have some old fuel there. I've seen major variations with this aspect, even to the point where the engine won't start at all or having serious detonation under load. Mogas seems to degrade faster than avgas in hot climates in my experience. This generally takes years however. Is the avgas that old?
I bought the 100ll out of 10,000 gallon tank that probably gets filled every 12 to 18 months. I might have just hit the bottom of the tank. I'll have to try the other FBO on the field, see if there's any difference. At least it's not a mechanical issue, thanks guys!
__________________
Joe Boisselle
2010 RV-4
1941 Luscombe 8C
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-29-2007, 09:23 PM
roadrunner20's Avatar
roadrunner20 roadrunner20 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bay Pines, FL (based @ KCLW)
Posts: 1,955
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joeboisselle;
I'm using the original slick mags set dead on at 25 deg btc as per the overhaul manual. Any thoughts? I'd like the option of being able to fly somewhere and purchase 100ll without worrying about it.
I'm going from memory here, but I believe Superior recommends 28 deg btc for autofuel exclusive.

I'll have to check when I get to the hangar tomorrow.

I use 93 UL local, & 100LL when enroute so I never reset.
__________________
Danny "RoadRunner" Landry
Morphed RV7(formally 7A), N20DL, PnP Pilot
1190+ hours
2019 Donation Paid

Last edited by roadrunner20 : 10-30-2007 at 07:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-29-2007, 09:47 PM
az_gila's Avatar
az_gila az_gila is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 57AZ - NW Tucson area
Posts: 10,011
Exclamation Not for Vantage engines

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanLandry View Post
I'm going from memory here, but I believe Superior recommends 28 deg btc for autofuel exclusive.
Dan... doesn't seem to be the case for the certified Vantage 360 engine.

This engine is certified for both auto fuel and 100LL, and the Type Certificate Data Sheet give 25 degrees BTDC for all fuels.

http://www.superiorairparts.com/vantageManuals.asp#

gil A
__________________
Gil Alexander
EAA Technical Counselor, Airframe Mechanic
Half completed RV-10 QB purchased
RV-6A N61GX - finally flying
Grumman Tiger N12GA - flying
La Cholla Airpark (57AZ) Tucson AZ
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-04-2007, 03:25 PM
roadrunner20's Avatar
roadrunner20 roadrunner20 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bay Pines, FL (based @ KCLW)
Posts: 1,955
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanLandry View Post
I'm going from memory here, but I believe Superior recommends 28 deg btc for autofuel exclusive.

I'll have to check when I get to the hangar tomorrow.

I use 93 UL local, & 100LL when enroute so I never reset.
Checked the manual today.
You actually retard timing to 22 for autofuel vs 25 LL.

I will also add that I have not changed the timing from 25 BTDC. When local I always use 93UL.
Cross country, I use the 100LL. Superior states you can combine octane as long as the combo mix is at least 91.
__________________
Danny "RoadRunner" Landry
Morphed RV7(formally 7A), N20DL, PnP Pilot
1190+ hours
2019 Donation Paid

Last edited by roadrunner20 : 11-04-2007 at 09:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-04-2007, 07:45 PM
frankh's Avatar
frankh frankh is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Corvallis Oregon
Posts: 3,547
Default Yes but they are guessing

I seriously doubt they have tested it on a dyno for peak performance with both fuels.

I have 26Degree max timing advance for either fuel and there is no runaway detonation or any difference in the engine running.

The E/Pmag also allow a max advance (with altitude) of 34 degrees and it runs just fine.

Remember there is one guy running a standard Lyc (25BTDC and 8.5:1 CR) and he is using 87 octane mogas...I.e regular not premium and has been for over a thousand hours I believe.

No signs of detonation on my engine when borescoped either.

I think the evidence suggests there is ample detonation margin running a standard motor with premium mogas.

Frank
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:44 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.