VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-17-2007, 08:12 PM
L'Avion's Avatar
L'Avion L'Avion is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Memphis
Posts: 159
Default Composite wing fuel tanks for RV-3

RV-3, SN 241, Type I Wing is going to require new fuel tanks.

Van's doesn't supply an RV-3 wing fuel tank kit, and Evan Johnson would prefer not to build from scratch, as we're going to have to do.

What about reverse-forming a wing fuel tank, and then creating a new one from either fiberglass, or carbon fiber?

donning flame-proof suit now,
Barney

Last edited by L'Avion : 10-20-2007 at 07:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-17-2007, 08:49 PM
Geico266's Avatar
Geico266 Geico266 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Huskerland, USA
Posts: 5,862
Default

Not a good idea. I haav seen many fiberglass fuel tanks from Rans leak and had to be replaced with the new poly tanks.
__________________
RV-7 : In the hangar
RV-10 : In the hangar
RV-12 : Built and sold
RV-44 : 4 place helicopter on order.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-17-2007, 11:31 PM
rv72004 rv72004 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 452
Default

If you build the tanks with vinelyester resin they will not leak. Vinelyester is made to withstand fuel etc. Glasairs are built with it . They dont leak!!
No need to seal the resin either like Lancair does with epoxy tanks.
__________________
EJ
RV7 flying
xp360, CS, All Glass cockpit
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-18-2007, 06:25 AM
Dave Cole's Avatar
Dave Cole Dave Cole is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Roanoke, VA
Posts: 306
Default Consider structural strength

In addition to carrying fuel, the fuel tank is structural...it provides torsional strength for the wing assembly. Can you achieve equivalent strength in a fiberglass tank, including the attachment points along the spar?
__________________
Dave Cole RV-7 N97DC reserved
dave.cole@cox.net
Started SB April 2004
Hope to fly in 2011
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-18-2007, 09:35 AM
f1rocket's Avatar
f1rocket f1rocket is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Martinsville, IN
Posts: 2,326
Default

I actually think it's a good solution to your problem. I've built fiberglass fuel tanks before. I actually prefer them over aluminum and Pro-seal.

I was pretty far along in the design and contruction of a ferry tank for the back seat of the Rocket that I planned for a record cross-country run. It was fiberglass all the way.
__________________
Randy Pflanzer
Greenwood, IN

www.pflanzer-aviation.com
Paid through 2043!
Lund fishing Boat, 2017, GONE FISHING
RV-12 - Completed 2014, Sold
427 Shelby Cobra - Completed 2012, Sold
F1 EVO - partially completed, Sold
F1 Rocket - Completed 2005, Sold
RV-7A - Partially completed, Sold
RV-6 - Completed 2000, Sold
Long-EZ - Completed 1987, Sold

Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-18-2007, 04:29 PM
gmcjetpilot's Avatar
gmcjetpilot gmcjetpilot is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,283
Default Well

Quote:
Originally Posted by L'Avion View Post
RV-3, SN 241, Type I Wing is going to require new fuel tanks.

Van's doesn't supply an RV-3 wing fuel tank kit, and Evan Johnson would prefer not to build from scratch, as we're going to have to do.

Sacrilege: What about reverse-forming a wing fuel tank, and then creating a new one from either fiberglass, or carbon fiber?

donning flame-proof suit now,
Barney
Fiberglass is brittle and will bust like an egg in an accident and spray fuel on you. Even if a bird hit it. It will bend and deform and take the energy, it will punch a hole and blow fuel all over.

Second, the stock tanks are not hard to build. Piper to Boeing are all WET (metal) tanks. No thanks. Fiberglass is for hot tubs and boats, IMHO. Also they will not fit since the thickness of the skin will be greater. Good luck if you try it.
__________________
George
Raleigh, NC Area
RV-4, RV-7, ATP, CFII, MEI, 737/757/767

2020 Dues Paid

Last edited by gmcjetpilot : 10-19-2007 at 12:10 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-18-2007, 07:43 PM
L'Avion's Avatar
L'Avion L'Avion is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Memphis
Posts: 159
Default Sacrilege: fiberglass fuel tanks

Use of the word "sacrilege" was metaphorical only, and not meant in any religious connotation; i.e. "a technical and not necessarily intrinsically outrageous violation of what is sacred." as in a comparison of a basically all aluminum aircraft to composite constructions. No offense was meant, I hope none has been taken.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-18-2007, 11:37 PM
rv72004 rv72004 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 452
Default

I agree with the fitting being a problem. I strongly disagree with them bursting and being weaker. Being a Glasair builder, I can tell you there is no comparison to the impact resistance of a good Glass plane to a tin one.
I remember a instance where some fellows flying in loose formation flew into a flock of birds.The RV was trashed. The Glasair sustained no damage and it took a half dozen direct hits.

I have personally had 2 bird strikes at 200 knots plus in the Glasair and there was zero damage to my leading edges other than smudges.
Try that in your RV !!
Please bear in mind we are talking pure strength here not crumple resistance etc etc. Cant beat glass. I guess thats why all the best modern aerobatic planes are Glass.
Nuff said.
__________________
EJ
RV7 flying
xp360, CS, All Glass cockpit
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-19-2007, 12:11 AM
gmcjetpilot's Avatar
gmcjetpilot gmcjetpilot is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,283
Default Thanks you are right

Quote:
Originally Posted by L'Avion View Post
Use of the word "sacrilege" was metaphorical only, and not meant in any religious connotation; i.e. "a technical and not necessarily intrinsically outrageous violation of what is sacred." as in a comparison of a basically all aluminum aircraft to composite constructions. No offense was meant, I hope none has been taken.
You are right my mistake, I got the dictionary out, thanks, deleted it.
__________________
George
Raleigh, NC Area
RV-4, RV-7, ATP, CFII, MEI, 737/757/767

2020 Dues Paid
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-19-2007, 12:24 AM
szicree szicree is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,061
Default

Please excuse my lack of familiarity with the -3, but would it really be that big a deal to build some tanks using parts available from Vans? Are the -3 ribs different from the -4's? The skin could surely be adapted from a -4's. Fiberglass can be made about as strong as anything, but it just seems like fitting them to a metal wing would be a real challenge.
__________________
Steve Zicree
Fullerton, Ca. w/beautiful 2.5 year old son
RV-4 99% built and sold
Rag and tube project well under way

paid =VAF= dues through June 2013
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:43 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.