1.) Is it worth the extra $1700 to go Horizontal?
NO
2.) Is it an easier installation over Vertical?
NO
3.) Is there any noticable difference - power or otherwise?
NO
4.) Would I be better off using that extra money for static / dynamic balancing and the extended warrantee?
Huha? (
send all extra money to me. 
)
Bottom line - Is this really just about whether or not you want the lower scoop on the cowl?
YES.
Remember the air has to turn 90 degrees somewhere, either in the airbox or plenum, one way or another it has to go vertical into the cylinder.
The no scoop set-up does gain (may be) mph or two top speed, mostly because of a slight less bit of drag, and VAN did a heck of a good JOB if designing the HORZ airbox. People think Van dreams this up, makes it and sells it to use. The VERT airbox is also excellent and also the result of years and decades of experiments and experience. If you want the path of least resistance (and cost) go vertical. However the Horz does have aesthetic appeal. If going CARB, the issue is moot. However going FI, you do have a choice to make. It's one of those things and as usual its about $$$.
One thing that would push me more towards the HORZ, which is not so obvious is exhaust choice. If you go with 4-into-1 exhaust the Horz induction makes it easier. I think most of the off the shelf 4-into-1 systems available are based on HORZ induction. You can fit a 4-into-1 exhaust with a carb, just a little less better fit. If you have a model "A" nose wheel 4-into-1 does not fit well (or at all), regardless of VERT or HORZ induction. However someone I think now offers a 4-into-1 for the model "A's"; not sure what induction is needed or if it makes a difference.