VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-23-2007, 07:27 PM
N941WR's Avatar
N941WR N941WR is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
Default n3prise

Hey Jerry,

Nora and I flew into 3M3 today to visit her parents and we went looking for your airport. Needless to say, we didn't find it but we did do an approach into the Valley of Death AKA Flying G.

We got down to about 75 AGL and my father-in-law (who is also a pilot and flies out of 3M3) said he "didn't feel comfortable" about the approach so we climbed on out.

For those of you who don't know this area, Flying G is a 2000 foot grass strip that is LINED with very tall trees. The opening felt like it was all of 50 feet wide with 150 foot trees on either side. I'm not talking about a few trees but rather a row of trees on both sides. I sure wish we had the camera with us.

Anyway, we descended down well below the tree line before climbing on out and heading back to Collegedale.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-24-2007, 07:34 PM
gmcjetpilot's Avatar
gmcjetpilot gmcjetpilot is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,283
Default Nice decisision

Takoffs are optional landings are eventually mandatory?
Go arounds are a NORMAL procedure that should be used routinely.
On approach consider it an approach to a go-around, the landing is optional.

Nice work, good decision Captain. Pucker factor x.x?

If more people would consider landing optional and the go-around and/or diversion more, there would be a whole lot less accidents. Such a simple little decision with significant positive impact on safety. What happened here was CRM, cockpit resource management. You listened and took action. Very nice. Even though your intended landing/flight was not completed, the flight was a total success (because you made this post). Even though you may have been in there before successfully, the co-pilot could've sensed some thing, not even he was totally aware of. The words "I'm not comfortable" is a red flag usually, sometimes not. Even if you had disregard the input, it at least deserves some serious discussion and analysis (not rationalization or got-ta-get-there-i-tus).
__________________
George
Raleigh, NC Area
RV-4, RV-7, ATP, CFII, MEI, 737/757/767

2020 Dues Paid

Last edited by gmcjetpilot : 09-24-2007 at 07:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:08 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.