VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-02-2007, 05:48 PM
szicree szicree is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,061
Question Would like opinions on this plenum

I would love to get some input regarding this plenum design.

http://websites.expercraft.com/n51pw...ry&log_id=7264

I'm confident I could whip this together in a few days and think it looks like a much more elegant setup than the stock one. I just hate the idea of all that air swirling around over the case for no reason, and the rubber seals against the cowl seem downright primitive (please do not take offense ). I know that the stock system has worked well on thousands of planes and over jillions of flight hours, but...
__________________
Steve Zicree
Fullerton, Ca. w/beautiful 2.5 year old son
RV-4 99% built and sold
Rag and tube project well under way

paid =VAF= dues through June 2013
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-02-2007, 06:27 PM
RV8RIVETER's Avatar
RV8RIVETER RV8RIVETER is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 1T7, Kestrel Airpark , Texas
Posts: 773
Default Yes, Yes

I can't agree more. After much thought and research I decided a while ago to build a 2 piece separate plenum. However, I will be glassing mine and putting a whole new front end on the cowl. I think it is the most elegant and efficient way to go. No air is wasted, all the air you bring onboard will be cooling something, and you don't need an access panel for the dipstick. It is more work, but nothing is free.

Check out this link, very interesting cooling design.
http://www.ez.org/feature/F0502-1/F0502-1.htm
__________________
Wade Lively
-8, Flying!
N100WL
IO-360A3B6D, WW 200RV

Last edited by RV8RIVETER : 08-02-2007 at 06:34 PM. Reason: added link
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-02-2007, 10:39 PM
DanH's Avatar
DanH DanH is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 08A
Posts: 9,477
Default

Steve,
These might help. Mark did a nice job.


Shot at 2007-08-02
__________________
Dan Horton
RV-8 SS
Barrett IO-390
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-03-2007, 12:45 AM
Rivethead Rivethead is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Corvallis Oregon.
Posts: 680
Default

Does anyone have actual numbers on the temps. I'm moving rapidly toward plenum building and I really like that design. One change I'd make possibly would be to remove any sharp bends from the upper surface. Although maybe that's not practical and in real life can't happen. AHHH! 90% done 90% more to go.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-03-2007, 08:07 AM
DanH's Avatar
DanH DanH is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 08A
Posts: 9,477
Default

The website in the first post should get you in contact with Mark Phillips.
__________________
Dan Horton
RV-8 SS
Barrett IO-390
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-03-2007, 08:10 AM
AlexPeterson's Avatar
AlexPeterson AlexPeterson is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Maple Grove, MN
Posts: 2,331
Default

I certainly do not know the actual performance of the setup shown in the pictures, but if there is not a large enough chamber for the air to slow down (i.e., recover pressure), it will not be as efficient. The single chamber (stock design or most plenums) balances out any differences in inlet flow between left and right.

Given the large number of variables affecting cht's within apparently similarly outfitted airplanes, the best way to really evaluate cooling systems might be to instrument the upper and lower chambers with a manometer to measure what the engine cares about - pressure differential top to bottom.

It is refreshing to see new creative approaches, but good instrumented data is the real proof of effectiveness.
__________________
Alex Peterson
RV6A N66AP 1700+ hours
KADC, Wadena, MN
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-03-2007, 09:47 AM
Christopher Murphy Christopher Murphy is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: colorado
Posts: 872
Thumbs down looks like

that set-up looks like it weighs a ton. All of those fasteners just add weight.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-03-2007, 09:54 AM
szicree szicree is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,061
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Christopher Murphy
that set-up looks like it weighs a ton. All of those fasteners just add weight.
C'mon now, a ton? I'd be willing to bet that the rubber seals and rivets that attach them on the stock setup weigh more than the fasteners on the dual plenum.
__________________
Steve Zicree
Fullerton, Ca. w/beautiful 2.5 year old son
RV-4 99% built and sold
Rag and tube project well under way

paid =VAF= dues through June 2013
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:09 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.