Haha... good one. This canopy stuff is driving me batty - I'm pretty sure I've been spending more time lately looking at skirts on the web than my wife does.
Anyway, to help satisfy my curiosity about this method, I sacrificed some scrap aluminum upon the altar of empirical research tonight and made a small mockup. Surprisingly, it didn't turn out too bad.
One piece has 1" slots cut in it, with 1/4" gaps in between: (dimensions chosen completely at random)
When the two pieces were riveted together I knew at once that I should have used a greater number of smaller tabs, to make the curve smoother. Well, this is why we test:
Underside view... it definitely is curving in two directions, just like I wanted:
Closeup view of the seam. I used an edge roller on the forward edge of the rear piece, which seems to have helped it lay down okay. I think with a tighter spacing of the tabs this might have turned out pretty good.
I do still have some unresolved questions, but this test was very informative. One open issue is what effect, if any, the more complicated shape of the canopy bow would have on the seam between the two pieces - for expediency I used a straight bend line, which is unrealistic. I'm also not sure that a rolled leading edge would want to follow a curve very well in thicker material... I used 0.020" for this test since I had some close at hand.
Probably what I'll do is first give the plans method of forming the skirts a chance. If that doesn't work I'll take those pieces and cut them down to form a row of tabs and try this method. It can't hurt, and it might just work...
Still would appreciate hearing from anyone who's actually gotten this to work, however!
cheers,
mcb