Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pczar3
IMHO, as an engineer who spent many hours doing safety system design, the reason not to have a "dark panel" is in the event of a failure in the LED or driver circuitry. Is it dark because it is okay or because something went west in the driver circuit? Some would argue that a light test circuit would solve that but how often do you check it in flight to assure it is okay? I would opt for a low light level that gets brighter and flashes with a problem. Bright and no flash... problem and a broken flasher, flash but not bright... problem and broken "bright" circuit... you get the idea. The idea with a warning light is that it gets your attention Master Warning etc.
Paul
N694BP - reserved
|
Paul,
That sounds like a good idea but isn't that kind of like a backup to the backup system?
Edit: 6/28/07
On the drive in to work this morning I was thinking about this post. This could be a backup to the backup to the backup to the backup, if you are running duel P-mags, as I am.
Here is why. The 2nd ignition is a backup for the first (1), the internal generator is a backup to ship's power (2 & 3), the light (dark or otherwise) is a backup to the operation of the units (4).
I'm sure this could go on but my point is, how much redundancy is required? If I really wanted a lot of redundancy, I would fly a bi-plane.

__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html