|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|
|
View Poll Results: Include a Test and Evaluation Subforum on VAF?
|
|
Yes, separating quantified test data is an enhancement
|
 
|
26 |
65.00% |
|
No, Another section in the forum is a detriment
|
 
|
14 |
35.00% |

02-07-2019, 10:23 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mojave
Posts: 4,643
|
|
Could we use a Test and Evaluation Subforum?
Recent posts have shown a need for a "Test and Evaluation" technical forum IMHO. In my mind VAF would benefit from a distinct section where new ideas are not only hatched (plenty of that already), but also fabricated/implemented and most importantly TESTED and validated. Note that I'm not talking about a guy who "... added Product X and now the engine runs smoother..." Thats a consumer review. I'm talking about evaluation via the scientific method. In this context it would at least include:
--System under test (description)
--Problem statement/opportunity for improvement
--Implementation/integration
--Success criteria/requirements
--Conduct Test/data collection
--Results/conclusion
In my mind the primary "rule" is that if one starts a thread in this section it is with the intent that it will be completed eventually. In other words don't start a thread with a pie in the sky idea that you are just spitballing. If you start it, finish it! Ultimately the section becomes a resource for people who are contemplating an idea and this will show them if it worked or not.
I recognize DR is not bound by peer pressure to change his forum and I also realize that this site is primarily a resource for people building kit aircraft. That said, there are plenty of us who are either in the formal flight test world or who are simply interested in quantifiable data. This poll is just to see if there is any interest.
__________________
WARNING! Incorrect design and/or fabrication of aircraft and/or components may result in injury or death. Information presented in this post is based on my own experience - Reader has sole responsibility for determining accuracy or suitability for use.
Michael Robinson
______________
Harmon Rocket II -SDS EFI
RV-8 - SDS CPI
1940 Taylorcraft BL-65
1984 L39C
Last edited by Toobuilder : 02-07-2019 at 10:33 AM.
|

02-07-2019, 11:00 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 4,428
|
|
There's already a flight-testing forum, and it seems to me that this topic would best fit into that.
Instrumentation and data analysis is a part of flight testing, and as the inclusion of fuel flow test into the EAA's flight test guide shows, it doesn't have to have an actual flight to validate its inclusion.
So I think a separate subforum is unnecessary. I'm not voting in the poll because I don't think it's a detriment. But I do think that this one is unnecessary.
Dave
Note - I am now ambivalent. Please see my post #13 regarding this. 2/8/19
Last edited by David Paule : 02-08-2019 at 11:27 AM.
Reason: See the last line.
|

02-07-2019, 11:26 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mojave
Posts: 4,643
|
|
Good point David. I honestly didnt even know the existing Flight Test forum was there. And considering that there have only been a handful of posts in the last year, perhaps many others dont know it either. That said, it seems to track a different purpose than what I'm proposing. My concept is a "technical" topic, not "educational". Maybe that's why it is overlooked? Perhaps the purpose of the area is ill defined?
At any rate, there are a host of topics that get discussed elsewhere on this forum that would belong in a "Flight Test" area. Maybe this poll will refocus the intent and perhaps get it moved into the technical area.
__________________
WARNING! Incorrect design and/or fabrication of aircraft and/or components may result in injury or death. Information presented in this post is based on my own experience - Reader has sole responsibility for determining accuracy or suitability for use.
Michael Robinson
______________
Harmon Rocket II -SDS EFI
RV-8 - SDS CPI
1940 Taylorcraft BL-65
1984 L39C
Last edited by Toobuilder : 02-07-2019 at 11:39 AM.
|

02-07-2019, 02:44 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 1,301
|
|
One of the phenomena that I've observed is that some moderators will all too quickly move a post into another area when it really should be given a chance to be read by all before it is dispatched. Safety comes to mind.
On the other hand, items for sale or wanted might be promptly dispatched.
__________________
RV-9A at KSAV (Savannah, GA; dual G3X Touch with autopilot, GTN650, GTX330ES, GDL52 ADSB-In)
Previously RV-4, RV-8, RV-8A, AirCam, Cessna 175
ATP CFII PhD, so I have no excuses when I screw up
2020 dues slightly overpaid
Retired - "They used to pay me to be good, now I'm good for nothing."
|

02-07-2019, 06:26 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central IL
Posts: 5,515
|
|
It seems to me that the flight testing section is about how to fly the plane, what data to gather (POH) and (maybe) how to plot flight data.
Methods, tools, and particularly instrumentation seem to be scattered around. Topics range from cooling, some in fuel systems, to some in drag reduction and are located with type category, general/discussion, traditional engines and more.
Personally, I would enjoy (and benefit from) a collection of knowledge on the instrumentation used to gather the data. Pressure, temperatures, velocities, and data loggers to facilitate gathering the information. The collective knowledge would help greatly in getting accurate sensors, and cost effective data loggers.
__________________
Bill
RV-7
Lord Kelvin:
“I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about,
and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you
cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge
is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind.”
|

02-07-2019, 06:43 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
|
|
I voted "No" because very few people really know how to perform test flights and it will soon become cluttered with what I'm afraid will be useless and incorrect info.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
|

02-07-2019, 10:05 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mojave
Posts: 4,643
|
|
Well, that illustrates part of the problem. The concept is less about the process of conducting a flight and more about validating an idea with data. You don't need to be a formal tester to validate an idea with data.
__________________
WARNING! Incorrect design and/or fabrication of aircraft and/or components may result in injury or death. Information presented in this post is based on my own experience - Reader has sole responsibility for determining accuracy or suitability for use.
Michael Robinson
______________
Harmon Rocket II -SDS EFI
RV-8 - SDS CPI
1940 Taylorcraft BL-65
1984 L39C
|

02-08-2019, 05:17 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central IL
Posts: 5,515
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by N941WR
I voted "No" because very few people really know how to perform test flights and it will soon become cluttered with what I'm afraid will be useless and incorrect info.
|
Yeah, kinda what we have now, but how can we improve that? Even getting the data is an art of it's own. Meaning: instrumentation.
__________________
Bill
RV-7
Lord Kelvin:
“I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about,
and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you
cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge
is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind.”
|

02-08-2019, 08:12 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mojave
Posts: 4,643
|
|
Think bigger, gents. While the minutiae of data collection is certainly encouraged, the real essence of any particular thread in my immaginary world is "concepts validated by test". Or more succinctly, its the "...put up or shut up..." section. Its a place where people have more to go on than the typical vague PIREPS of commercial products they've installed, or the wild "game changing" claims of products yet to be built in hardware.
The current fuel pump test thread belongs here
Dans "shrinking exit" belongs here
multiple ignition timing threads belong here
The oil cooler diffuser thread belongs here
To name just a few
What we need is a one stop shopping clearing house for changes, tweaks, modifications that that have been validated or invalidated by TEST.
__________________
WARNING! Incorrect design and/or fabrication of aircraft and/or components may result in injury or death. Information presented in this post is based on my own experience - Reader has sole responsibility for determining accuracy or suitability for use.
Michael Robinson
______________
Harmon Rocket II -SDS EFI
RV-8 - SDS CPI
1940 Taylorcraft BL-65
1984 L39C
|

02-08-2019, 08:31 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 5,745
|
|
I agree Michael. Would make things easier to find for sure.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:58 AM.
|