VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #1  
Old 04-01-2007, 06:12 PM
hevansrv7a's Avatar
hevansrv7a hevansrv7a is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,587
Default A New GPS Question

My wife and I flew NWA to Puerto Rico today. I had a looksee at the A320 panel and a chat with the pilots. They use 3 cross-checked inertial guidance systems and the usual land based stuff, but no GPS. They told me that above 20,000 feet that GPS is not accurate. They were proud of only a half-mile position error at the end of a medium length flight. I said my hand held would beat that and that's when they said no, not at altitude. OK, so at cruising altitude I pulled out my 496 that I had in my carry on because it has the street level mapping for PR. It said the position error was 76 feet, speed 475 kts and so on.. OK, that's pretty bad compared to down low, but it's not half a mile, is it? Thanks to the new era in commercial flight, I could not share this with them during the flight and could not cross check Lat-Long at a given moment.

So, are there any real experts out there who can shed light on this question? OK, I know RV's don't fly above 20k, but the question is at least interesting.
__________________
H. Evan's RV-7A N17HH 240+ hours
"
We can lift ourselves out of ignorance, we can find ourselves as creatures of excellence and intelligence and skill. We can be free! We can learn to fly!" -J.L. Seagull
Paid $25.00 "dues" net of PayPal cost for 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 (December).
This airplane is for sale: see website. my website

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-01-2007, 06:40 PM
Yukon Yukon is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Phoenix, Az
Posts: 920
Default

Our inertial navs on the older 737's are updated constantly by DME/DME fixes.
Without the dme fixes, the inertial data becomes very inaccurate over time.

All newer installations use GPS as well as DME. I have never heard of the altitude issue.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-01-2007, 06:41 PM
panhandler1956's Avatar
panhandler1956 panhandler1956 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,686
Default That's not correct

That 20,000' thing is BS, we routinely use GPS as primary nav in our business jet FMS platforms and it is much more accurate than our inertials. The older corporate jets used inertials as primary, now they are all GPS primary and IRS (inertial reference system) as backup. With the new RNAV arrival and departures we have to have relatively accurate nav info in the flight levels (18,000 and above).
The IRS is also used for EFIS platforms although some of the smaller jets us AHRS as it is cheaper. The AHRS is similar to what all these fancy experimental EFIS systems use.

I have friends at work that could talk all day long on the subject of RNP (required navigational performance) as it relates to GPS, IRUs, etc. We operate 400+ corparate jets of all flavors.
__________________
Brent Owens
EAA Chapter 9 Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor
Columbus, OH
RV-8 'Contrary Mary' flying
N784DE S/N #82614

www.fixedwingbuddha.com
Follow me on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-01-2007, 06:54 PM
Kevin Horton's Avatar
Kevin Horton Kevin Horton is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,357
Default

I have no idea where they get the stuff about GPS not being accurate above 20,000 ft. Complete BS. I've participated in many flight test programs that used GPS at altitudes up to 51,000 ft, and there has never been any concerns about its accuracy.

They don't have GPS because the A320 was designed before GPS was available for IFR. The navigation system uses triple inertial reference systems updated using DME-DME. It is more than accurate enough for enroute, terminal and non-precision approaches (except for a very small number special approaches that require higher navigation performance).

Airbus later added an optional GPS, but many airlines that had older aircraft didn't buy the optional GPS on the newer ones, as they wanted to have all the aircraft in the same configuration (lowers pilot training costs, etc). The airlines have been very, very slow to adopt GPS. There are many older airlines still flying around using VOR navigation, as the airline bean counters aren't prepared to spend the money to upgrade the avionics to add GPS.
__________________
Kevin Horton
RV-8
Moses Lake, WA, USA
http://www.kilohotel.com/rv8/
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-01-2007, 07:28 PM
Ironflight's Avatar
Ironflight Ironflight is offline
VAF Moderator / Line Boy
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 12,247
Default Just a little higher....

We are now using GPS on both the Space Shuttle and International Space Station as another navigation source (we use several, and compare them), and I am perfectly comfortable using it when needed - and our accuracy requirements are pretty high. It did take several years of tweaking and playing around to get good solutions when you're traveling 18,000 mph, but once you figure that out - GPS rocks!

Paul
__________________
Paul F. Dye
Editor at Large - KITPLANES Magazine
RV-8 - N188PD - "Valkyrie"
RV-6 (By Marriage) - N164MS - "Mikey"
RV-3B - N13PL - "Tsamsiyu"
A&P, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor
Dayton Valley Airpark (A34)
http://Ironflight.com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-01-2007, 07:32 PM
cytoxin's Avatar
cytoxin cytoxin is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: south carolina
Posts: 1,111
Default so can i take it on the big plane

im going on a big jet ride, can i get it through security or should i leave it at home. i dont want a DRE at the gate (see prostate thread for further info on the DRE)
__________________
William Weesner/ still kicking.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-01-2007, 08:26 PM
Wes Hays's Avatar
Wes Hays Wes Hays is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Winters, TX
Posts: 156
Default

I took my 396 with us when we flew commercial to Alaska. Pulled it out above 10K ft. and it picked up the sats out of the window. It was really a kick following us along and seeing where we were. I don't think there will be a problem at all. We took it through Canadian and American customs with out any questions at all.

Have a great time with it!

Oh by the way, no DRE's either.
__________________
Wes Hays
Winters, TX
RV-6A Flying 900+ hrs
RV-7A Fuselage
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-01-2007, 09:45 PM
Brambo Brambo is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boulder City
Posts: 179
Default

I fly the A320/A319 for United and I can tell you that the GPS works just fine above 20,000'. All of our 319's have GPS and most of our 320's also. There are still a few A320's that use the old DME/DME update.

Bill Rambo
RV-7A
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-01-2007, 11:11 PM
craigvince's Avatar
craigvince craigvince is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 1,207
Default Portable GPS on comm flights

Quote:
Originally Posted by cytoxin
im going on a big jet ride, can i get it through security or should i leave it at home. i dont want a DRE at the gate (see prostate thread for further info on the DRE)
I have ferried many a small plane by traveling one-way on a big plane. I've never had any problems with any of my flightbag contents. (I leave the Leatherman tool and portable flare gun behind now, though).
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-02-2007, 05:35 AM
hevansrv7a's Avatar
hevansrv7a hevansrv7a is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,587
Default Wow and Thanks!

You guys are the best. Thanks for clearing that up!
__________________
H. Evan's RV-7A N17HH 240+ hours
"
We can lift ourselves out of ignorance, we can find ourselves as creatures of excellence and intelligence and skill. We can be free! We can learn to fly!" -J.L. Seagull
Paid $25.00 "dues" net of PayPal cost for 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 (December).
This airplane is for sale: see website. my website

Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:09 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.