VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-12-2007, 10:43 AM
rv9builder rv9builder is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 872
Default Aeroquip Fitting for Facet Fuel pump

I'm thinking of using this fitting on the Facet fuel pump. Does anybody see a potential problem with this?

http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalo...uipfitting.php

Thank you,
__________________
Mark
RV-12iS Fuselage
RV-9A Project: Sold

VAF donation made for 2020
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-12-2007, 10:52 AM
alpinelakespilot2000 alpinelakespilot2000 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,642
Default

Used it on mine. It sure simplified that connection! I got the idea from someone else on this list. Although I confirmed its appropriate use with other experienced builders, I did not check with Van's.
__________________
Steve M.
Ellensburg WA
RV-9 Flying, 0-320, Catto

Donation reminder: Jan. 2021
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-12-2007, 11:08 AM
rv9builder rv9builder is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 872
Default

Thanks, Steve. Any clearance problems with the fitting hitting either the fuselage floor or the cover that goes over the fuel and brake lines?
__________________
Mark
RV-12iS Fuselage
RV-9A Project: Sold

VAF donation made for 2020
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-12-2007, 11:29 AM
alpinelakespilot2000 alpinelakespilot2000 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,642
Default

Hi Mark-

I had no problem with clearance on the floor. It was perfect, at least if you mount your boost pump per plans.

There MIGHT be a tiny bit of interference with the forward cover, but I don't think so in my case. I do remember thinking that maybe I'd put a dab of RTV on the highest part of the fitting just to give some cushion to the cover, but I don't think it will be necessary.

Hope this helps.
__________________
Steve M.
Ellensburg WA
RV-9 Flying, 0-320, Catto

Donation reminder: Jan. 2021
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-02-2007, 10:47 AM
jlfernan's Avatar
jlfernan jlfernan is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Port Orange, Fl
Posts: 476
Default

Used it on mine, and it did simplify things. After trying several times to make the bends in the line per plans, I gave up. My only problem was that I ran short on the tubing provided by Vans and so I bought some from a local aircraft hardware supplier. This stuff is 5052 aluminum which is MUCH stiff than the 3033 Vans sends. After a few choice words though, it went right in. About a 16th of an inch clearance between the cover and the nut. I put a drop of RTV on the nut, just in case. I also used the 5052 for my brake lines, hard to work with, but this stuff is used on certified aircraft and the additional strength can only be good.

__________________
http://www.mykitlog.com/JorgeF
Jorge Fernandez
Spruce Creek, FL
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-02-2007, 03:54 PM
frankh's Avatar
frankh frankh is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Corvallis Oregon
Posts: 3,547
Default Perfectly fine

And they are also available at your local Hydraulics shoppe if your in a hurry.

Frank
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-04-2009, 08:18 PM
chaskuss chaskuss is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: SE Florida
Posts: 1,499
Default 5052 vs 3003 Versitube

Quote:
Originally Posted by jlfernan View Post
snipped My only problem was that I ran short on the tubing provided by Vans and so I bought some from a local aircraft hardware supplier. This stuff is 5052 aluminum which is MUCH stiff than the 3033 Vans sends. snipped
Jorge,
Actually, all tubing in certified aircraft is done with 5052. I'm anal, so I was concerned with the cosmetics of my tubing, as well as it's function. The Versitube that Vans supplies is a pain in the a$$ to try to straighten out. The 5052 (I got mine from ACS) comes in 6 ft long straight lengths. I found it easier to start with straight tubing and place bends in it (as opposed to straightening tubing wound up in a roll). Vans Versitube scratches (and gets gouges) even when using a proper bender, like the Imperial Eastman tool. The 5052 also is rated for twice the pressure of the Versitube (it's 3003, not 3033). I used the Versitube to make prototype parts with. I made the actual parts from the 5052. My tubing looks great (even if I'm the only one who ever sees it). It resists scratches and nicks MUCH better than the 3003 Versitube. For the brake lines (high pressure) I think the 5052 is the only way to go.
Charlie Kuss
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:27 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.