VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-10-2018, 03:10 PM
RicoB RicoB is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 253
Exclamation O-320 airbox opening size

Could anyone tell me what is the smallest size for the airbox opening would be for a O-320. I am trying to decide either to put the seal on the inner walls of the airbox or the outside like the book shows. But putting on the inside will def make the intake lil smaller..
thanks for all of the inputs
__________________
Rico Burgos
2018- RV9a at KWHP
1959- C-150 at KMOD
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm3018529
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-10-2018, 03:13 PM
YellowJacket RV9 YellowJacket RV9 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Clearwater, FL KCLW
Posts: 1,281
Default

Is there a specific reason you would want to deviate from the plans and do it that way? Mine is per plans and works fine.

Chris
__________________
Chris Johnson
RV-9A - Done(ish) 4/5/16! Flying 4/7/16
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-10-2018, 03:21 PM
RicoB RicoB is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 253
Default

Honestly i think the way the book says its fine but my partner has a preference of doing the the seals on the inner walls of the airbox. so i am doing my research and there isn't any problems i don't mind doing that way. My concern is ending up with a small opening. But what is too small?
__________________
Rico Burgos
2018- RV9a at KWHP
1959- C-150 at KMOD
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm3018529
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-11-2018, 01:03 PM
RicoB RicoB is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 253
Default

No one has an idea on this?
__________________
Rico Burgos
2018- RV9a at KWHP
1959- C-150 at KMOD
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm3018529
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-12-2018, 06:11 AM
humptybump humptybump is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 3,179
Default

The general consensus is to avoid deviating from the plans as it relates to critical systems. The power plant is a critical system. Since power is a factor of fuel AND air, if you voluntarily give up airflow you are giving away power.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-12-2018, 11:44 AM
RicoB RicoB is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 253
Default

Thank you for the reply. I agree with that myself .
__________________
Rico Burgos
2018- RV9a at KWHP
1959- C-150 at KMOD
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm3018529
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:54 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.