VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #21  
Old 10-25-2017, 09:36 AM
DonFromTX's Avatar
DonFromTX DonFromTX is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: La Feria Texas
Posts: 3,822
Default

Let me preface this with the statement that I have the utmost respect and admiration for Vans and their products and methods.
That said, it would have been fun to be a fly on the wall when they discussed tires, tubes and wheels. On the one side, they looked at what we wound up with in our kits, the cost being about $651 for the RV 12, vs a huge list of tires, tubes and wheels that were probably as strong, as light, and as good a choice, for probably somewhere in the $30 to $60 range for the whole plane! I have not checked to see what other kit makers have used to reduce costs.
__________________
A&P, PP-SEL, Pathological Flier, EAA Technical Counselor
EAA Chapter 595 President,http://www.595.eaachapter.org/index.htm
Retired US Army Officer
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-25-2017, 09:48 AM
rv6builder's Avatar
rv6builder rv6builder is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Delta BC
Posts: 122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sblack View Post
I have been trying to find ways around this, where I can. I can't make transponders, ADS-Bs or tires, but the bendix p-lead terminal kit is 2 ferrules, a nut, an AN washer and a small piece of phenolic. It should cost $5 but it costs $113! So I got some phenolic from McMaster and spent a very pleasant evening at the lathe. Done. Next, I ordered a new plastic oil dipstick tube. It is a 10" long piece of molded ABS plastic. $90 US. And lo and behold the cap and dipstick assembly is not a common thread between the 3 different lengths of dipstick tube. They are different, so it will cost another $100 for a new dipstick. No, I will be headed back to the lathe for that.

I guess it is tough to make a profit in aviation, so when companies can, they really go to town. That bendix terminal kit is the biggest ripoff going, and it is a horrible way to attach the shielding to the mag - no straight relief at all. Bad design, horribly over priced. We are better off rolling our own where we can.
Couldn't agree more! And it me its so rewarding "rolling your own". Recenetly I made a 1" thick crush plate in the lathe and mill, throttle cable bracket, and a pair of static ports. A little time consuming, but its fun and saves money for gas!
__________________
Alex Doughty
Canadian ATPL
Flying!!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-25-2017, 10:14 AM
rvbuilder2002's Avatar
rvbuilder2002 rvbuilder2002 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hubbard Oregon
Posts: 9,035
Default

Aviation is plagued by two different issues.....

- The cost of liability

and

- The cost of low volume production

Put these two together and it makes prices of aviation parts seem ridiculous when compared to Walmart.

Van's has not become the premier kit aircraft seller in the world by ignoring opportunities to reduce cost. Just the opposite.

If the notion that a tire is a tire (regardless of who made it and where it was purchased) was true, then I guess it would be true for engines also, and we would all be flying RV's with an engine that came out of a wrecked car.....

P.S. I would be curious to take a look at the complete set of wheels, brakes, and tires that could be bought for only $60 to put on an RV-12. A complete set of just tires for my riding lawnmower (from Walmart) would cost a minimum of $120.
__________________
Opinions, information and comments are my own unless stated otherwise. They do not necessarily represent the direction/opinions of my employer.

Scott McDaniels
Van's Aircraft Engineering Prototype Shop Manager
Hubbard, Oregon
RV-6A (aka "Junkyard Special ")

Last edited by rvbuilder2002 : 10-25-2017 at 10:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-25-2017, 11:30 AM
Sam Buchanan's Avatar
Sam Buchanan Sam Buchanan is online now
been here awhile
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 4,301
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonFromTX View Post
Let me preface this with the statement that I have the utmost respect and admiration for Vans and their products and methods.
That said, it would have been fun to be a fly on the wall when they discussed tires, tubes and wheels. On the one side, they looked at what we wound up with in our kits, the cost being about $651 for the RV 12, vs a huge list of tires, tubes and wheels that were probably as strong, as light, and as good a choice, for probably somewhere in the $30 to $60 range for the whole plane! I have not checked to see what other kit makers have used to reduce costs.
Don, I recently bought four tubes for a riding mower I converted to an airplane tug. I shopped several vendors, Walmart and Ebay included, and still spent $50 for cheap, generic tubes. New tires from Walmart online would have been more than twice that amount. Those tires have load and speed ratings waaaay too low for aircraft use......

The other kits with which I am familiar use wheels and tires from many of the same vendors Vans uses. These are safety-critical items that no kit manufacturer (or pilot!) wants to see fail. Less expensive wheels are pretty much limited to ultralights (and wheelbarrows....) and most will not accommodate brakes. I don't think many builders would want those wheels and tires on their RV-12.....
__________________
Sam Buchanan
RV-6
Fokker D.VII replica

Last edited by Sam Buchanan : 10-25-2017 at 11:41 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-25-2017, 11:49 AM
dtw_rv6 dtw_rv6 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Martinsville, IN
Posts: 454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FasGlas View Post
One of the best things of Experimental is that we don't have to use TSO / PMA's part.
^^^^^^
This is what keeps the big guys in check. What do you think a G3 would cost (if it was even available) if the likes of Dynon, MGL, GRT, et. al. couldn't enter the marketplace?
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-27-2017, 12:14 PM
DonFromTX's Avatar
DonFromTX DonFromTX is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: La Feria Texas
Posts: 3,822
Default

Part of the problem is old age. At 80 it still seems like a new car should be around $1500 yet, whatever happened there?
I got my new tube from Vans today and was surprised to actually see something written on it, never seen that before. Now this looks like maybe one that will not leak - at least not so badly.
[IMG][/IMG]
__________________
A&P, PP-SEL, Pathological Flier, EAA Technical Counselor
EAA Chapter 595 President,http://www.595.eaachapter.org/index.htm
Retired US Army Officer
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-27-2017, 05:02 PM
alcladrv alcladrv is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Southeast
Posts: 569
Default

About half of 10 or so Leakguard tubes I've installed in the past 12 years lose about 10 psi over the course of a month after being inflated to 50 psi. The better ones only lost 3 or 4 psi.

On the Michelin Airstops I just installed new this past July, I just added 10 psi today to each to bring them back up to 50 psi. It would be great to go a year without having to add air, but doesn't seem likely.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-27-2017, 05:10 PM
Ironflight's Avatar
Ironflight Ironflight is offline
VAF Moderator / Line Boy
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 12,256
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by alcladrv View Post
About half of 10 or so Leakguard tubes I've installed in the past 12 years lose about 10 psi over the course of a month after being inflated to 50 psi. The better ones only lost 3 or 4 psi.

On the Michelin Airstops I just installed new this past July, I just added 10 psi today to each to bring them back up to 50 psi. It would be great to go a year without having to add air, but doesn't seem likely.

I've always found the Michelin's to leak far less than the Leakguards - and the Michelin's only cost a couple of bucks more (last time I checked).
__________________
Paul F. Dye
Editor at Large - KITPLANES Magazine
RV-8 - N188PD - "Valkyrie"
RV-6 (By Marriage) - N164MS - "Mikey"
RV-3B - N13PL - "Tsamsiyu"
A&P, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor
Dayton Valley Airpark (A34)
http://Ironflight.com
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-28-2017, 11:47 AM
DonFromTX's Avatar
DonFromTX DonFromTX is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: La Feria Texas
Posts: 3,822
Default

Wow that is bad. Now I am unsure if I want to change out the tubes to the new one, might even be worse than what is in there!. It would not be so bad if I could get down on the floor, roll the aircraft around to align the valve stem, then fish thru the hole to check pressure and add air.
Getting old sure sucks.

air.QUOTE=alcladrv;1214491]About half of 10 or so Leakguard tubes I've installed in the past 12 years lose about 10 psi over the course of a month after being inflated to 50 psi. The better ones only lost 3 or 4 psi.

On the Michelin Airstops I just installed new this past July, I just added 10 psi today to each to bring them back up to 50 psi. It would be great to go a year without having to add air, but doesn't seem likely.[/quote]
__________________
A&P, PP-SEL, Pathological Flier, EAA Technical Counselor
EAA Chapter 595 President,http://www.595.eaachapter.org/index.htm
Retired US Army Officer
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-28-2017, 12:51 PM
jliltd jliltd is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Rancho San Lorenzo
Posts: 885
Default

I have had many of the newer Leakguard Butyl tubes simply fail outright over the last 3 years (One hasn't gotten truly religious until one lands a Pitts S-1 with a flat main in tight wheelpants). Butyl rubber is not natural rubber. It is a synthetic rubber with the advertised advantage of being impermeable to air. Unfortunately since it is a synthetic it is basically molded similar to plastic. You can see the mold lines on the surface of the Leakguards. These mold lines are where we have found many failures of the Leakguards. So while they don't leak sitting in the hangar, they do completely fail when one of those mold lines chafe on the inside of the tire. Natural rubber does not do that. I try to avoid Leakguards. I don't have a problem with natural rubber as long as I check pressures regularly. I think the big push toward Butyl tubes has more to do with their being cheaper to produce as much as anything. And you gotta hand it to the marketing guy who thought up charging more for cheaper stuff. Brilliant.

I am glad to hear that Michelin Airstop tubes are having better success that Leakguard. I will try some Michelins next.

Here are some pointers with respect to the synthetic Butyl tubes:

1. If installing Butyl inner tubes use even more talc powder than traditional amounts. This will help with the chafing failure rate we have seen rearing it's head recently.

2. Make sure your baby powder or tire powder is in fact "talc" and not cornstarch. Most of the cheap generic brands are cornstarch. Cornstarch is made of larger particles than talc and cornstarch is hygroscopic meaning it absorbs moisture from the air. This gives it a propensity to get clumpy and sticky over time instead of dry and smooth which might be a contributing factor in the mold line chafing. Talc is made of smaller particles of clay and minerals and while it too can absorb a certain amount of moisture from the air that doesn't cause it to get sticky like cornstarch.

3. Check the air pressures in Butyl tubes often and keep pressures on the high side to minimize chafing. Low pressures exacerbate the chafing. Of course now you will be checking pressures as often as with natural rubber tubes.

I think.

Jim
__________________
RV-8
(a few more airplanes too)

Last edited by jliltd : 10-29-2017 at 08:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:10 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.