|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

02-20-2007, 12:33 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Kalispell, MT
Posts: 40
|
|
RV classification...experimental forever??
Hi all-
Newb here...
When you finish your RV, how is it classified by FAA? Is it experimental forever or is it experimental during flyoff and then something else?
I seem to remember something about not being able to fly an experimental aircraft over "congested" areas...is that still in effect? If so, how do you deal with it?
Thanks!
__________________
Geek out... 
RV-8: Empennage underway
N406RR reserved
|

02-20-2007, 12:36 PM
|
|
unqualified unfluencer
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Highland Village, TX
Posts: 4,086
|
|
Hi Rob!
Experimental forever and you can fly where you want, pretty much.
Best,
Doug
__________________
Doug Reeves (your host) - Full time: VansAirForce.net since '07 (started it in '96).
- Part time: Supporting Crew Member CAE Embraer Phenom 300 (E55P) @ KDFW.
- Occasionally: Contract pilot (resume).
Last edited by DeltaRomeo : 02-20-2007 at 12:39 PM.
Reason: typo
|

02-20-2007, 12:36 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI area
Posts: 2,967
|
|
Experimental forever. No pax during flyoff. But, you can fly them anywhere else that any other airplane is allowed to fly. VFR or IFR if properly equipped.
__________________
Chad Jensen
Astronics AES, Vertical Power
RV-7, 5 yr build, flew it 68 hours, sold it, miss it.
|

02-20-2007, 12:47 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,324
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cjensen
Experimental forever. No pax during flyoff. But, you can fly them anywhere else that any other airplane is allowed to fly. VFR or IFR if properly equipped.
|
All true, but there can be a catch, be sure that the "operations limitations" document says exactly that under phase two. This is also where the day/night and VFR/IFR determination comes in.
John Clark
RV8 N18U 200+ hrs
KSBA
|

02-20-2007, 12:48 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: White Swan Wa.
Posts: 366
|
|
A little off topic from the original question but I've wondered why they never got a type certificate for thier designs. I know it's expensive, but you'd think with the popularity of what they have they'd go that extra step. Also, what's keeping anyone else from taking thier designs or something similar and putting them into production?
Hmmmm...
__________________
Joe Boisselle
2010 RV-4
1941 Luscombe 8C
|

02-20-2007, 12:54 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MKE
Posts: 1,519
|
|
Joe, I think the answer to both questions is the same. Cost vs. reward. It would cost Van's a fortune to certify their designs, and that cost would be passed on to the consumer. How many factory built turn-key RV7s 8s or 9s do you think they would sell for $150-200K? I'd bet not more than a dozen or two. The same would apply to anyone else looking to sell RV-clones as certified airplanes.
Van's is doing a land-office business selling kits. What's the incentive for them to sell whole airplanes?
__________________
Jeff Point
RV-6, RLU-1 built & flying
Tech Counselor, Flight Advisor & President, EAA Chapter 18
Milwaukee
|

02-20-2007, 12:54 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI area
Posts: 2,967
|
|
Certifying an airplane is a HIGHLY expensive proposition. Somewhere on the order of $70 mil for one design. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but it's VERY expensive to do. I think Van's is doing just fine selling kits, and they have zero liability after the kit is sold.
__________________
Chad Jensen
Astronics AES, Vertical Power
RV-7, 5 yr build, flew it 68 hours, sold it, miss it.
|

02-20-2007, 01:01 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cjensen
Certifying an airplane is a HIGHLY expensive proposition. Somewhere on the order of $70 mil for one design. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but it's VERY expensive to do. I think Van's is doing just fine selling kits, and they have zero liability after the kit is sold.
|
When building an airplane such as Cessna does, they have to certify the aircraft AND the manufacturing process/facility.
After a company goes through the expense of certifying the design then they have to describe exactly how they are going to build it, source the parts, etc. If they find a better way to build the same aircraft, they have to recertify the construction process.
Not to mention what happens if they change even the smallest part in the aircraft.
Add to that the liability insurance they would have to have; it just isn't worth it.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
|

02-20-2007, 01:04 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
|
|
BTW, I can think of only a few kit built planes that were certified.
One being the Gruman AA-1. (It started life as a Jim Bede kit/plans)
The other being the Zenair 601, which now looks more like a PA-28 than a 601.
I'm sure there are others and we will probably see more that become certified as LSA's
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
|

02-20-2007, 01:13 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,762
|
|
Back to the original post; An experimental amateur-built may NOT be flown over congested area during the flight test period. As one has already pointed out, your "operating limitations" is the controlling document. If you have an old set of operating limitations, you may not be able to fly over congested areas ever. If you have these old op lims, you need to get your FSDO to issue the latest and greatest, or get a recurrent airworthiness certificate which will include the current op lims. Remember, and amateur-built IS an experimental. An experimental is not necessarily an amateur-built. Experimental covers Research & development, Show Compliance, Crew Training, Exhibition, Air Racing, Primary aircraft, Amateur-Built Aircraft and Light-Sport Aircraft.
BTW Bill,
I'm pretty sure the 601 has not been certificated. It is offered as a S-LSA, but that is still not a certificated aircraft. Each and every S-LSA must be inspected by FAA or a DAR and issued a Special Airworthiness Certificate (8130-7)
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
Last edited by Mel : 02-20-2007 at 01:17 PM.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:34 AM.
|