VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-10-2007, 04:18 PM
Kevin Horton's Avatar
Kevin Horton Kevin Horton is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 2,357
Post Lift and Drag vs Flap Deflection

I was playing around a bit with Xfoil, a 2-D airfoil analysis program, and wondered if it would give any sensible predictions of lift and drag vs flap angle. I selected a Reynolds number and Mach number appropriate to a stall at 1800 lb at sea level in a short wing RV. The predictions seem pretty much in line with what I would expect.


The first 10 degrees of flap gives a useful 13% increase in CLmax (note - only part of the wing has flaps, so the reduction in stall speed would be much less than this 13% increase in lift would suggest). The drag increase is quite small. But, once you get to 15 degrees of flap the drag has increased noticeably, and the drag increases quickly with flap angle. The amount of CL increase with additional flap angle gradually flattens out.

Code:
flap     Clmax      AOA
angle              Clmax
(deg)              (deg)
 0       1.718     17.8
 5       1.837     16.8
10       1.936     15.8
15       2.017     15.0
20       2.085     14.0
25       2.138     12.9
30       2.179     12.0
35       2.206     11.3
40       2.225     10.7
Notes: These CL max numbers are for a theoretical 2-D airfoil section - i.e. it extends to infinity in each direction. A real wing, with a finite span does not develop as much lift as these CL numbers would suggest, as there is a lot of potential lift lost due to the 3-D airflow effects.
__________________
Kevin Horton
RV-8
Moses Lake, WA, USA
http://www.kilohotel.com/rv8/
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-10-2007, 04:58 PM
hevansrv7a's Avatar
hevansrv7a hevansrv7a is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,587
Default Practical Question

So Kevin, and all others with experience, using this data and practical experience:

What is the best technique for grass fields, especially rough ones (I fly an A model). Is 10 degrees of flap best or would more CL be better, even with the added drag, given that there's plenty of power? What flap setting will get me off the ground best while allowing me to keep the nosewheel off the ground? Isn't there a pitching moment from the flaps?

I have noticed that flap settings don't affect stall AOA much, but they somehow do seem to affect takeoff behavior. I once accidentally took off with full flaps from a paved runway and it seemed to go up more vertically, but would not build speed.

Good advice would be gratefully received. Thanks.
__________________
H. Evan's RV-7A N17HH 240+ hours
"
We can lift ourselves out of ignorance, we can find ourselves as creatures of excellence and intelligence and skill. We can be free! We can learn to fly!" -J.L. Seagull
Paid $25.00 "dues" net of PayPal cost for 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 (December).
This airplane is for sale: see website. my website

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-10-2007, 05:07 PM
Mel's Avatar
Mel Mel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,762
Default

My recommendation for short field take off is 15 degrees flap on the short wing RVs. This is the same as the "down" aileron. My testing has shown this to be pretty optimum for short field TO. I use 13.3 degrees on my -6 because I have manual flaps and don't have a 15 degree notch.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-10-2007, 05:38 PM
fodrv7's Avatar
fodrv7 fodrv7 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Torquay, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 826
Default In the air

Kevin,
I have heard of the mention technique of setting take-off flap to max aileron throw for Short-fields.

So far I have not found that I need any extra take-off performance..

Similarly, on down wind the problem is more to slow the aircraft down to the flap limit and so when I reach it I take full flap to help keep the speed down as I descend on base.

So to sum it up, I use the flaps only for drag and so use full flap or none.

But, your data is always interesting and welcome.
Pete.
__________________
Peter James.
Australia Down Under.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:34 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.