Quote:
Originally Posted by krw5927
Unfortunately the only thing that's useful for transfilling is pressure. Welders can use nearly all the O2 in the tank because they only need 10 PSI or so. But for transfilling, a bulk tank 3/4 full in terms of cubic feet remaining is nearly useless.
Some folks get 2 tanks just for this purpose. Bulk fill off the emptier tank, then top up to full pressure with the fuller one. Makes them both last longer than they otherwise would individually.
|
Yep - developed a spread sheet for this. Starting with full 251 tanks (K?), one tank would yield 5 fills (22 cf, JD) if it was at 300 psi before filling. With two K tanks cascading, one would get 15 fills before dropping below 1500 psi on filled tank.
I question getting a proper trans fill hardware manifold for $100 and would like to see the diagram and parts list. I did the economics for a $30 fill and with $450 for trans fill hardware, one K tank, it would take 12 fills (with mileage cost) to pay off the investment. It takes about 20 with 2 K tanks.
Yes, the cost per fill is way low, so payback in calendar time will depend on how much one uses/fills the tanks. It might be better just to get two flight tanks, and use each one down to the bottom.
The convenience of always having an 80% full flight tank anytime for TO is also to be considered, not just the cost per fill. A few friends at an airport would easily push a 3 tank cascade into reality in terms of cost and convenience. If you could get them to pay - they are pilots.
In case you wanted to get the last psi from the K tank and fully fill the flight tank there is a compressor for that. I got a quote for$5k. Payoff is a bit longer. Conclusion - cascade with more tanks is still way more cost effective.
So what am I doing - finishing my plane. Then get make the O2 refill decision.