VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Traditional Aircraft Engines
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-10-2017, 02:38 PM
catmandu's Avatar
catmandu catmandu is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 917
Default Need for a check valve?

Ever mindful of making improper system modifications, I am looking to the braintrust here as GoogleFu is not coming up with anything.

RV-6A Carbed O320

I am rebuilding the cockpit, part of that is removing the center tower which means relocating the fuel selector valve. Upon disassembly, I found a check valve I did not know I had: Circle Seal Valve, Fuel Check 600psi Pat. 2538364 869A-6TT-8

It is installed after the fuel selector valve, prior to the electric fuel pump, which in turn is prior to the gascolator.

Turns out it was not operational due to some soft tank debris jamming it open. It was suggested locally that it may be there to keep a prime on the engine driven pump, but SOP for me is to turn on the electric pump prior to start, and I never noticed any sort of issues with my engine.

Given that is has collected debris that may have been trapped and discovered in the gascolator, is there a reason to keep this valve installed?
__________________
Mike C.
Sierra Nevada
RV-6A bought flying
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-10-2017, 03:04 PM
Sam Buchanan's Avatar
Sam Buchanan Sam Buchanan is online now
been here awhile
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 4,300
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by catmandu View Post
Ever mindful of making improper system modifications, I am looking to the braintrust here as GoogleFu is not coming up with anything.

RV-6A Carbed O320

I am rebuilding the cockpit, part of that is removing the center tower which means relocating the fuel selector valve. Upon disassembly, I found a check valve I did not know I had: Circle Seal Valve, Fuel Check 600psi Pat. 2538364 869A-6TT-8

It is installed after the fuel selector valve, prior to the electric fuel pump, which in turn is prior to the gascolator.

Turns out it was not operational due to some soft tank debris jamming it open. It was suggested locally that it may be there to keep a prime on the engine driven pump, but SOP for me is to turn on the electric pump prior to start, and I never noticed any sort of issues with my engine.

Given that is has collected debris that may have been trapped and discovered in the gascolator, is there a reason to keep this valve installed?
A check valve is not part of the "standard" carbed RV fuel system. I would not want it in my plane.
__________________
Sam Buchanan
RV-6
Fokker D.VII replica
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-10-2017, 03:32 PM
vic syracuse vic syracuse is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Locust Grove, GA
Posts: 2,624
Default Remove it.

Most fuel problems are caused by modifications to a known good working fuel system, of which the RV's have a proven record.

Vic
__________________
Vic Syracuse

Built RV-4, RV-6, 2-RV-10's, RV-7A, RV-8, Prescott Pusher, Kitfox Model II, Kitfox Speedster, Kitfox 7 Super Sport, Just Superstol, DAR, A&P/IA, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor, CFII-ASMEL/ASES
Kitplanes "Unairworthy" monthly feature
EAA Sport Aviation "Checkpoints" column
EAA Homebuilt Council Chair/member EAA BOD
Author "Pre-Buy Guide for Amateur-Built Aircraft"
www.Baselegaviation.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-10-2017, 03:50 PM
David Paule David Paule is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 4,428
Default

I concur with Sam.

Check valves have two ways they can fail, of course: they can fail open, as yours luckily did, or closed, blocking flow completely. And since they have an inlet and an outlet, there are two additional points that could leak. Sometimes they are built in a way that provides additional potential leak points.

If you want redundancy in a check valve, you need four of them, two in parallel which are themselves in series with another parallel pair, to ensure that a single failure can't block the flow of fluid or, like yours did, allow fluid to flow in both directions. Since the set of four could have a single failure without symptoms and without affecting performance, the set of them would need to be fitted with some sort of sensor arrangement that reports their status. This is because once a single check valve fails, the system is no longer redundant and is vulnerable to another single failure.

Since they aren't part of the design, it's best just to leave that thing out.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-10-2017, 04:00 PM
catmandu's Avatar
catmandu catmandu is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 917
Default

Well, thanks all.

Out it goes, which will simplify shortening the tubing runs!
__________________
Mike C.
Sierra Nevada
RV-6A bought flying
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-10-2017, 05:16 PM
JonJay's Avatar
JonJay JonJay is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Battleground
Posts: 4,348
Default

Debris? Make sure it isn't slosh flaking off the tanks.
__________________
Smart People do Stupid things all the time. I know, I've seen me do'em.

RV6 - Builder/Flying
Bucker Jungmann
Fiat G.46 -(restoration in progress, if I have enough life left in me)
RV1 - Proud Pilot.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-10-2017, 06:49 PM
catmandu's Avatar
catmandu catmandu is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 917
Default

Nope, slosh check on the tanks was good, but thanks for mentioning it. This stuff had some bulk, was mostly round on the edges, about 1/8" long. Looked like what I would expect to see breaking away from the edge of a seam.
__________________
Mike C.
Sierra Nevada
RV-6A bought flying
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-11-2017, 07:19 AM
snopercod's Avatar
snopercod snopercod is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 2,092
Default flush the sytem!

After the system is back together, I recommend that you thoroughly flush the lines all the way to the carburetor inlet before flying again. You should also remove and inspect the carburetor inlet screen and the gascolator screen. Call me anal, but I remove and inspect those screens during every Condition Inspection.
__________________
(2020 dues paid)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-11-2017, 09:22 AM
Ralph Inkster Ralph Inkster is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 999
Default

In place of the check valve, an inline fuel filter (protecting the boost pump) would be acceptable. Be sure not to use a paper filament type automotive filter!
__________________
Ralph
built a few RVs, rebuilt a few more, hot rodded some, & maintained/updated a bunch more
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-11-2017, 10:55 AM
Canadian_JOY Canadian_JOY is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,280
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralph Inkster View Post
In place of the check valve, an inline fuel filter (protecting the boost pump) would be acceptable. Be sure not to use a paper filament type automotive filter!
In this case it's a carb'ed engine so no boost pump to need protection, or so it would seem...

Fuel systems seem to work best when the three S's are employed... Seamless, Straight and Simple!
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:51 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.