VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Avionics / Interiors / Fiberglass > GPS
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-27-2017, 05:42 PM
Tbone's Avatar
Tbone Tbone is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: South
Posts: 526
Default BNC bulkhead connector

What are the thoughts on a standard pass through with grommet and proseal vs BNC connector through the firewall for the gps antenna/MB antenna coax cable? Would there be a noticeable reduction in signal loss? Other options?
__________________
___________
Terry
RV7
XP IO360
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-27-2017, 08:12 PM
wjb's Avatar
wjb wjb is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Half Moon Bay, CA
Posts: 1,031
Default

Connectors are always a source of problems; two new interfaces to deal with a probably 1-2 dB of loss. If you can swing it, feed the cable through the hole and use a grommet or eyeball feedthrough to close things up. However, from a signal strength perspective, you won't see much if any effect on SNR of the GPS signals.

My personal preference is not to put the antenna under the cowl, but lots of others have done it and are happy.
__________________
Bill Bencze
N430WB RV-7 #74152 @ KHAF, tip-up; IO-360-M1B; Hartzell CS. !! Phase 1 !!
2357 hrs over 8.5 years to get to flying. Log at: http://rv7.wbencze.com
VAF 2020 donation happily made
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-28-2017, 06:56 AM
snopercod's Avatar
snopercod snopercod is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 2,092
Default In theory...

In theory, the BNC connectors will only lose about 0.1 dB per connector, assuming you use a good quality connector like Amphenol. That said, I worry about the vibration working things loose. I had the coax partially work it's way out of the BNC connector on my transponder antenna and give me intermittent signal. Having a bulkhead connector might provide for easier maintenance, but it would add several failure points. Not only that, but how will you access the connector on the back of the firewall? I agree with wjb; Just go with a continuous feed line. I would make the hole in the firewall large enough for a BNC connector to pass through. That way, you can purchase pre-fabricated cable assemblies from L-com. They make really good cables.
__________________
(2020 dues paid)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-28-2017, 10:28 AM
RV6_flyer's Avatar
RV6_flyer RV6_flyer is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NC25
Posts: 3,502
Default

According to Amphenol a BNC connector will have 0.2 dB Max loss @ 3 GHz. (GPS is < 1.6 GHz)

I have seen bulkhead connectors that have the coax fastened to one side so the connector count drops to one instead of two connections. That typically gives ease of access / service with an acceptable loss.

I would try to find a UG-909/U connector and go that route if not too expensive.

__________________
Gary A. Sobek
NC25 RV-6
Flying
3,400+ hours
Where is N157GS
Building RV-8 S/N: 80012

To most people, the sky is the limit.
To those who love aviation, the sky is home.

Last edited by RV6_flyer : 01-28-2017 at 10:30 AM. Reason: Add link to purchase part.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-19-2017, 11:04 PM
RV7A Flyer's Avatar
RV7A Flyer RV7A Flyer is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: US
Posts: 2,245
Default

I used a bulkhead connector on the firewall for my MB antenna, because I did the thing with just a stripped length of coax glassed into the lower cowl (so it has to disconnect at the firewall to remove the cowl). No issues at all.

But then again, MBs are going away eventually anyway...

Also, both GPS antennae are under the cowl, and no issues at all, FWIW.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-20-2017, 03:21 PM
rv7charlie rv7charlie is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pocahontas MS
Posts: 3,884
Default

One alternative, especially if you have multiple cables to pass through the firewall, is to pick a convenient spot & use a flanged tube, along with intumescent caulk & firesleeve. Spruce sells a kit for a lot of money, or you can search ebay or the local big box store for equivalents (stainless towel rods or grab bars). You can work around the mess of the caulk by 'running some lines' on a non-stick surface, letting them cure, and stuff the empty space in the tube with the little sticks of caulk.

You can even run lines that at a bit antagonistic to each other (noisy stuff with small signal stuff) by having them diverge on both sides of the firewall, so they are effectively crossing in the tube.

Charlie
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:33 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.