VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Traditional Aircraft Engines
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-10-2016, 04:14 PM
William William is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tampa, Florida (KVDF)
Posts: 491
Default Static fuel flow testing.

Curious how these numbers compare to others. I have a standard vans firewall forward setup for a carbureted o320. I have a lycoming o320-b2a and the red cube and mechanical fuel pump are after the gascolator. Curious if the fuel flow at the carb is normal. It is flowing quite a bit less fuel after going through the mechanical fuel pump and the red cube. Flow rates were with the electric boost pump on. What's your thoughts?

- left tank fuel flow is 9 minutes 20 seconds to fill 5 Gallons at the gascolator

- right tank fuel flow is 9 minutes 40 seconds to fill 5 gallons at the gascolator

- at the carburetor fuel flow is 12 minutes 40 seconds to fill 5 gallons.


Thanks
Bill
__________________
RV6A flying as of November 8, 2016. N717WK

Finishing a RV10
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-10-2016, 05:24 PM
RVDan RVDan is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 819
Default

Round numbers, 12.66 minutes for 5 gal is 23.85 gal/hr. I seem to recall that you typically want 1.25 X max flow expected for the engine in operation for a flow check, which would lead you to a max engine flow rate of about 17.8 GPH. I seem to recall that for the 0-320 max flow is somewhere in the 13.5 to 14GPH range, so it should be sufficient.

That said the flow rate should be checked with the aircraft in the most critical attitude which would be nose high on max power climb. You should arrange the aircraft in a nose high attitude and then do the check. In that attitude the pump has the most height to pump the fuel which will yield the lowest flow rate.
__________________
Dan Morris
Frederick, MD
PA28-140
Hph 304CZ
RV6 built and sold
N199EC RV6A flying
Learn the facts. "Democracy dies in darkness"
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-10-2016, 05:39 PM
William William is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tampa, Florida (KVDF)
Posts: 491
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RVDan View Post
Round numbers, 12.66 minutes for 5 gal is 23.85 gal/hr. I seem to recall that you typically want 1.25 X max flow expected for the engine in operation for a flow check, which would lead you to a max engine flow rate of about 17.8 GPH. I seem to recall that for the 0-320 max flow is somewhere in the 13.5 to 14GPH range, so it should be sufficient.

That said the flow rate should be checked with the aircraft in the most critical attitude which would be nose high on max power climb. You should arrange the aircraft in a nose high attitude and then do the check. In that attitude the pump has the most height to pump the fuel which will yield the lowest flow rate.

Hi Dan the test was done with the tail sitting on the ground. I'm aware of the required minimums but what I'm not sure of is the lower flow rate after the red cube and mechanical pump normal? I'd expect a small difference but my difference is quite large. I've got suspicion my mechanical fuel pump is going out. Curious if a failing mechanical fuel pump could cause a restriction in fuel flow.

Thanks
Bill
__________________
RV6A flying as of November 8, 2016. N717WK

Finishing a RV10

Last edited by William : 12-10-2016 at 05:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-10-2016, 05:46 PM
RVDan RVDan is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 819
Default

I don't know what the loss is for each, but you certainly will experience some loss with pumping through the mechanical pump and the red cube. And the test is intended to address the most critical situation. The red cube drops about .4psi at your max flow so that will certainly result in a flow loss, not even considering the losses due to the fittings. Keep in mind that 90 degree fittings are a considerable impedance to flow.
__________________
Dan Morris
Frederick, MD
PA28-140
Hph 304CZ
RV6 built and sold
N199EC RV6A flying
Learn the facts. "Democracy dies in darkness"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-11-2016, 08:12 AM
Marc Bourget Marc Bourget is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Stockton, California
Posts: 294
Default

I understood the target to be 150% of max fuel flow for the engine - with the aircraft at or above the typical 17 deg stall angle of attack. (Roll it up a bank or steep driveway ??)

Finally, with only a gallon or two in the tank. Take your measured container and a stop watch and "do the math".
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-11-2016, 08:50 AM
Steve Melton's Avatar
Steve Melton Steve Melton is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 2,789
Default

my flow rate at the carb = 24 gal/hr thru the gascolator and fuel flow meter with min fuel.
__________________
Steve Melton
Cincinnati, OH
RV-9A, Tip-up, Superior O-320, roller lifters, 160HP, WW 200RV, dual impulse slick mags, oil pressure = 65 psi, EGT = 1300F, flight hours = 800+ for all

Simplicity is the art in design.
My Artwork is freely given and published and cannot be patented.
www.rvplasticparts.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-11-2016, 10:31 AM
William William is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tampa, Florida (KVDF)
Posts: 491
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Melton View Post
my flow rate at the carb = 24 gal/hr thru the gascolator and fuel flow meter with min fuel.
Thanks Steve for that info that is almost exactly what I'm getting. I'm getting a low fuel pressure of .4psi during climbing with the boost pump off and Lycoming states .5psi as the minimum. I believe the mechanical fuel pump isn't up to snuff. I bought it off of a gentleman that switched to fuel injection so needed the high pressure pump and this is the only part on my engine that wasn't new or overhauled. I've got a new tempest pump from spruce on the way and will test next week.

Thanks
Bill
__________________
RV6A flying as of November 8, 2016. N717WK

Finishing a RV10
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-11-2016, 10:32 AM
William William is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tampa, Florida (KVDF)
Posts: 491
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc Bourget View Post
I understood the target to be 150% of max fuel flow for the engine - with the aircraft at or above the typical 17 deg stall angle of attack. (Roll it up a bank or steep driveway ??)

Finally, with only a gallon or two in the tank. Take your measured container and a stop watch and "do the math".

Thanks Marc.
__________________
RV6A flying as of November 8, 2016. N717WK

Finishing a RV10
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:06 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.